Maybe to replace PS3/Vita games we get movies and music and rename Instant Game Collection to something else to reflect that?
PlayStation Network managers have been hesitant to team up with their movie and music counterparts, worrying that the service's core gamers would balk if they felt that Sony was pushing, say, family films at them.
i think they already tried something like that when they changed the PSN to the SEN (Sony Entertainment Network) late last gen but they changed it back once it didn't work out.Or maybe even changing "PlayStation Plus" to "Sony Plus" as you include movies and music to try to add some nongamers to that 80+ million.
Not sure what to make of their end game with this. Four player Ghostbusters game incoming? Cynics will say this already started with Insomiac's Spider-Man, but we know that had nothing to do with the movie deal.
Spider-Man?The fact that their game and movie divisions dont utilise each others IPs boggles the mind.
Microsoft's biggest problem was putting that stuff at e3. If they saved all the entertainment stuff for something like Ces, there wouldn't have been a backlash about it.It is crazy how Sony still hasnt been able to do anything big with PSN in regards to movies and music...
They are huge on the music and movie industry and every other player in those respective industries would give their right leg for an 80 million active userbase platform
Who cares about box office performance? Using popularity to determine whether or not something is garbage is a bad idea. I mean Big Bang Theory is a putrid shit manifested as a sitcom and it somehow gets high ratings.Why do some of you have such absurd reactions to Venom? It's a fun movie and smashed box office expectations.
You mean when they unveiled a new platform to a gaming crowd, and emphasized features they didn't care about? Yeah, totally the same thing.
It is crazy how Sony still hasnt been able to do anything big with PSN in regards to movies and music...
They are huge on the music and movie industry and every other player in those respective industries would give their right leg for an 80 million active userbase platform
Not really, the issue with microsoft was the always online and no used games.
You mean when they unveiled a new platform to a gaming crowd, and emphasized features they didn't care about? Yeah, totally the same thing.
Not really, the issue with microsoft was the always online and no used games.
Of course sony do need to be careful to not fall to the same errors microsoft did in 2013.
But it means that there are people out there that find value in it. Not everyone has tastes as refined as yours, doesn't make it trash, doesn't make you right and them wrong.Who cares about box office performance? Using popularity to determine whether or not something is garbage is a bad idea. I mean Big Bang Theory is a putrid shit manifested as a sitcom and it somehow gets high ratings.
(I always get suspicious when people use the term "fun" to describe a film)
This isn't oversimplifying the situation at all.They are going to use their console to push their movies and music.
Microsoft's biggest problem was putting that stuff at e3. If they saved all the entertainment stuff for something like Ces, there wouldn't have been a backlash about it.
Nothing to do with one another.
This isn't just you but what's with all the "durr hurr XB1" shitposting? Were you all asleep in 2013 or are you just trying to twist this into something it isn't because console wars? The problem with the XB1 reveal in regards to the multimedia capabilities was the messaging, not the fact it had them (as it's not like the PS4 doesn't have Netflix, Spotify, Vue, etc), and that's because Microsoft seemed to think marketing the XB1 as a multimedia hub would sell it to a larger audience than just a gaming system. Sony never did this, they had the multimedia stuff there but they focused the PS4's marketing around the games. Sony Music, Pictures and Interactive collaborating more isn't going to change that.
Yep, presumably they'll keep the latter in mind. I don't mind admitting that my PS4 is used primarily for films and TV these days (family life...), but the important thing is I use apps like iPlayer and Amazon Prime for that which are available everywhere. The console I pick up next gen, despite no doubt still being primarily for films and TV, will be chosen based on what's best to me for gaming.I'm gonna laugh so freaking hard if the PS5 announcement is full of TV and Sports references ala the X1.
Time is a flat circle indeed.
The thing about those ~80 million users is that you might be able to sell them some TV/Film/Music content, but they got those millions of users by specifically focusing on gaming stuff, transitioning to selling them 'entertainment' as a general thing instead of focusing on improving their gaming experience is a risky move.
While I would like that it seems like replacing apples with oranges and I'm not sure how people would react. Instead of an old Soul Calibur, here's a copy of the Karate Kid.We are very close to the point where they stop PS3 and Vita offerings for PS+ (as far as I remember February is the last month). Maybe this means they are going to add movies instead of games for older platforms?
Well it is on plus, so it's free already
It's just your typical unsubstantiated fanboy nonsenseIn no universe is Playstation going to suddenly announce a PS5 whilst using movies, music, and digital marketplace cohesion as the primary selling point.
If anything this would be an additional benefit similar to Playstation Vue where the core functionality is emphasized but the additional ecosystem options are highlighted.
The alarmism suggesting Playstation's future endeavors and Xbox of 2013 are remotely equivalent is baffling. The negative press alone, the myriad of articles telling them to avoid the dumpster fire, and the historic self immolation of the Xbox brand in 2013 is enough for them to not attempt something this stupid
This. Also, they've made their WWS initiative the cornerstone of their PlayStation business. It wouldn't make any sense lmao. Gaming will always be the centerpiece of their platforms.Yeah. There's a large gap between what's in the OP and where MS positioned itself. It's the difference between distributing entertainment on your network versus turning your game division into a general entertainment company. Sony already has large movie/tv/music businesses. Microsoft didn't, and the Xbox division lost focus trying to cover those bases - Mattrick himself was signing tv content deals when he should have been signing game deals. They also let those ambitions materially affect hardware design in ways detrimental to game performance.
It's very hard to see Playstation getting into that kind of position today - where they would be given the reigns over movie/tv/music operations leaving execs with limited attention for game content deals, or where hardware would take a turn based on those demands.
My guess: having more entertainment apps from the start than PS4 did, with preferred visibility for Sony apps/services and perhaps cross-marketing/bundling with PS subscriptions. Perhaps more leveraging of premium movie assets in games ala Spiderman.
Not Kodera/Layden et al spending their days working on movie and music contracts while game companies hold on the phone, or Cerny designing something into the PS5 hardware in a way that compromises game performance...
Nuance is possible even if historical analogies are more tempting/simple.
Mr. Yoshida wants to make better use of the company's online PlayStation Network as a way to bring Sony movies, shows and music directly to consumers.
Yeah this is how I see it too. The service sub etc etc for the entertainment content would the primary focus while the hardware would be use as accomodating platform. Which I believe is a good news for gamers since Sony would definitely focus more on creating games and They might even willing to sell their hardware for example like PS5 cheaper.Basically - whereas the Sony under Kaz was 'consumer electronics company with an added advantage of entertainment content creation... the direction that has been hinted by Kaz's successor is that they're an entertainment company with music, movies and games at the forefront.
And if we needed any more proof that that is the direction that Yoshida is going with, his big moves that he's taken ever since he became CEO were:
https://www.funimation.com/blog/201...s-acquired-sony-pictures-television-networks/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-worlds-biggest-music-publisher-idUSKCN1IN01F
https://money.cnn.com/2018/05/14/news/companies/peanuts-dhx-sony/index.html
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/new-sony-ceo-kenichiro-yoshida-o