Ironically, this would make "catching them ALL" truly unattainable.Interesting. Either that or they still want the feat of "catching them all" to be reasonably attainable again.
Or a third answer: Delay the game and stop pumping them out every 3 years.
Then delay the fucking game so you can make those previously created 3D models and animations work in Sword and Shield.Even then you just have some 3D Models. You still need to make them work in the game, test all of the Pokemon in and outside of battles, plan them into your single-player experience and then it should not be too expensive. The series is popular, beloved and profitable for a reason and it always supises me, that people think, GameFreak doesn't know, what they are doing.
I don't recall Sun and Moon having 801 Pokemon roaming freely in the overworld. I doubt they would program all that AI and not use it in the game (I don't see why the 3DS wouldn't handle a couple Pokemon per screen).You do realize Sun and Moon had data for overworld Pokemon? And it wasn't just the original 151, it was all 801 Pokemon.
It's not as simple as copy pasting models. They'll have to do touch ups to make sure it looks good. They might be adding new animations. And if course, there's monstrous amounts of testing just to make sure everything works. It's not a simple software engineering task at all.The entire reason why the 3DS games had such ridiculous high-poly models (Which tanked those games' performance) was so that they could be reused for future projects. If they didn't have the time and money to include a basic feature of the series by November, they could have delayed the game.
Delay the game. No one is asking for more crunch. We're asking for more than the bare minimum. The models are already done FFS.Resetera: advocates for less crunch and better working conditions for developers
Also resetera: GIVE ME ALL THE FUCKING POKÉMON
Like I imagine this had to happen at some point? Especially with the jump to HD and a more ambitious release. I'm sure a lot of work has to go into making sure all of the hundreds (are we nearing a thousand yet?) Pokémon are up and working and working the way they should.
It was already reasonable before.Interesting. Either that or they still want the feat of "catching them all" to be reasonably attainable again.
I don't recall Sun and Moon having 801 Pokemon roaming freely in the overworld. I doubt they would program all that AI and not use it in the game (I don't see why the 3DS wouldn't handle a couple Pokemon per screen).
Even if they did, it still takes resources to QA all that movement in a new gameplay environment (e.g. new open world, free camera, etc.) What I'm arguing is that Game Freak clearly has the resources for this, but are clearly not investing enough to get this done.
Why are people so quick to dismiss any criticism towards a game...This is completely valid criticism.Are you telling me there's a large and vocal portion of pokemon fans that are unreasonable?? I for one am shocked
Exactly.Every single Pokemon is someone's favorite Pokemon. That's the fucking appeal of the series. The monsters are the most important thing period. I can't believe that is going to be thrown out of the window.
Delaying cost even more money and will hurt the franchise. Having a balance between releases, quality and content is the key of Pokemon's success. A great game, which comes in 2019, balanced around the given, limited number of Pokemons, will be a better game foe the audience and the producers, then the same with 900 Pokemon randonly thrown into the game.Then delay the fucking game so you can make those previously created 3D models and animations work in Sword and Shield.
It's also important for the series, then you get to meet new Pokemon, which can be your new favorite companien. It keeps the series fresh.Every single Pokemon is someone's favorite Pokemon. That's the fucking appeal of the series. The monsters are the most important thing period. I can't believe that is going to be thrown out of the window.
The models are already created and, when extracted, at about the same fidelity as we've seen in the trailers. The models even had baked in overworld animations that were never used until LGPE. Unless there's not enough room on the Switch cart for all the Pokemon I can't really think of a reason for not allowing each and every Pokemon to be in the game other than:
*Artistic decision (in which case it's a silly one which should be criticized)
*Not enough time (in which case, just delay the game, we don't actually NEED a yearly Pokemon release, will also give extra time for other aspects of the game)
No one in this thread has advocated for crunch, only for delaying the game.
Obviously if the choice was actually between no crunch and all the Pokemon, it should be no crunch. But there IS a third option.
Delay the game. No one is asking for more crunch. We're asking for more than the bare minimum. The models are already done FFS.
Old Pokemon are just reusing old models and animations. There is a reason XY models were so high poly for 3DS.I have a friend who is really upset over this too, been going off about it all morning. Some other friends have been disputing her, and my viewpoint is this eventually had to happen. This is their first HD Pokemon game, which brings with it several challenges, especially to deliver the game in a timely manner as fans will expect. The number of Pokemon also keeps increasing, and with the increased fidelity and demand to 3D model and animate each Pokemon means doing 900+ Pokemon in a single game is, frankly, a pretty ridiculous demand.
There's only really four ways they could go about this:
01. Not include all the Pokemon (what they opted for).
02. Lower the graphical/animation quality of each Pokemon to make them easier to develop.
03. Stop adding new Pokemon in the games, cap them off.
04. Go for a subscription type service with Pokemon post-launch.
I know it's not what some fans want to hear, but this was always an eventuality of the franchise. I'm sure they can use the Sword and Shield engine for upcoming entries so they can build on it with the next entry, however.
It's not a "simple" solution, but I guarantee the inevitable updated rereleases will have the full national pokedex as a selling point.It's not as simple as copy pasting models. They'll have to do touch ups to make sure it looks good. They might be adding new animations. And if course, there's monstrous amounts of testing just to make sure everything works. It's not a simple software engineering task at all.
You can speak for yourself, but personally, I'd much rather not have the game delayed. There's more than enough Pokemon in the game for it to be fun as it is imo.
Personally, I would delete Jynx before any of those Pokemon. Though they did fix her design, meaning I hate it less than I did before. Besides, every Pokemon is someone's favorite which is why this announcement caused such a big shitstorm in the first place.
In the treehouse they said Dynomax would be replacing Mega's and Z moves. I didn't hear the exact wording regarding how this would work.Is it confirmed no megas, z-moves, and national dex? I definitely did not expect this to include all 900 Pokemon.
Man, so what's the point of having that new Pokémon bank system if half of the little monsters can't be played with on sword/shield. Something ain't rightIt was already reasonable before.
Completing the pokedex and all the rewards you would get from it in the last generation were obtainable by capturing and trading ingame pokemon.
They did all that without screwing people who wanted to transfer in non dex pokemon they had been using and building for years.
Whe they released X and Y they made 3D models from the ground up for 700+ Pokémon and make a Pokémon game in 3D for the first time and animations form all of them, they should've commited to bring all the Pokémon.It's not as simple as copy pasting models. They'll have to do touch ups to make sure it looks good. They might be adding new animations. And if course, there's monstrous amounts of testing just to make sure everything works. It's not a simple software engineering task at all.
You can speak for yourself, but personally, I'd much rather not have the game delayed. There's more than enough Pokemon in the game for it to be fun as it is imo.
We don't need a new Pokémon game every year. There are AAA franchises that Pokémon makes way more money than that take 3-5 years between releases. There is no reason Pokémon can't do the same.Delaying cost even more money and will hurt the franchise. Having a balance between releases, quality and content is the key of Pokemon's success. A great game, which comes in 2019, balanced around the given, limited number of Pokemons, will be a better game foe the audience and the producers, then the same with 900 Pokemon randonly thrown into the game.
But nobody was thinking you could transfer Go Pokemon to here?This is really disappointing. Went from "must buy" to "skip" pretty hard on this game because the biggest appeal to me was bringing my entire Pokemon collection (3DS, Go and Let's Go) together in the game.
This news makes me just want to wait for the game that does bring it all together.
I have no faith that Game Freak will rebalance things in a significant way.Delaying cost even more money and will hurt the franchise. Having a balance between releases, quality and content is the key of Pokemon's success. A great game, which comes in 2019, balanced around the given, limited number of Pokemons, will be a better game foe the audience and the producers, then the same with 900 Pokemon randonly thrown into the game.