Never a meal on a first date. Just coffee or drinks. Depending on how it goes, I'll usually pay. If she doesnt make even an attempt on second date to pay, then its unlikely it goes anywhere.
Ok, I still would never characterize somebody I just had a meal with as a "total stranger". I also wouldn't treat a date as "almost exactly the same as a job interview". I think your advice is bad, literally.No, all dates are totally different...a spark can happen at the beginning of a 1st date or at the end of date #10. You are being literal with the "total stranger" part...you can know someone beyond being a stranger but feel like they won't be someone good to date based on how they react when the check comes.
Again...people have options and you are selling an experience. Dating is almost exactly the same as a job interview.
I see you playa 👏When I was dating, the first date was always coffee or drinks, I pay full. I'm a Male for reference. After a few awkward meals for first dates and even more awkwardness come time to pay I cut that shit out quickly. Drinks only. Meal when I knew we're good and then I dont mind paying.
Years ago I went on a first date with a very pretty girl who was a model, my idiot friend told me to "split the bill bro" and my idiot 20 year old reptile brain did it. We went back to her car afterwards and she said "do you know how you fucked up tonight?" and she then explained that you always have to pay in full on the first date and the consequence is that she's no longer interested in seeing me
That was tough love
Then you are projecting your own dating habits on others or you are naive about the information your date is giving you. If you have a long time of getting to know someone before a date, that is fine...but that's not the experience for most people.Ok, I still would never characterize somebody I just had a meal with as a "total stranger". I also wouldn't treat a date as "almost exactly the same as a job interview". I think you advice is bad, literally.
Exactly, I question the percentage of dating that make it to the 2nd/3rd date...or how often intimacy happens on the 1st/2nd date, for people that say otherwise. The question is, how do you settle the bill...not, how do people only interested in dating people wanting a monogamous long term relationship based only on personality and how you like someone as a person. At worst, people that don't offer are leaving alot of sex on the table.Okay, but for the single dating man, the act of paying for a meal is an attractive trait for many women.
If that's how you wanna go, then fine, but that does limit the people you're able to attract and keep dating.
It's not. Because most first dates are pretty much that.Ok, I still would never characterize somebody I just had a meal with as a "total stranger". I also wouldn't treat a date as "almost exactly the same as a job interview". I think your advice is bad, literally.
So my question is are you looking for an attempt or for her to actually pay? Reason why I ask is that it's a messy situation if she makes the attempt to pay, but end up not being able to due to circumstances
So after a first meal together you are pretty much at the same point in a relationship/social dynamic as that totally random stranger you walked past earlier that you had never scene before, didn't make eye contact with, or talk to?It's not. Because most first dates are pretty much that.
It's a lot of asking questions and prodding each other's interests. And you need to sell yourself on why YOU as a person are interesting.
Yea, looking for an attempt or a split. Although, its not really about the money and more of an insight to her personality and intentions.
Bingo.And this is dating. People aren't trying suss out whether or not the person they're going out with is an "equal partner" or not. It's about attraction and having an experience.
You're being pedantic and literal though...if we are going by Webster Dictionary then yes it's not a total stranger but the trust on her end still isn't there to be a friend or really even an acquaintance based on the circumstances.The poster I was replying to suggested that after all the questions, talking, and prodding of a first date, it's still a "total stranger" dynamic. I don't agree with that characterization.
As far as dating between straight men and women go, this is saying the same thing as "the man pays."
yeah I figured. I only ask because this guy asked me out on a date & he offered to pay when I Said to just give me a few weeks to gather my finances together lol. I don't want to show up to a date empty handed & Id feel bad if he paid in full anyway
Yes, really, honestly.Not really
Pretty sure a lot of women will think less of a man who wouldn't at least offer to pay the bill. These are not old time social norms, they are still in full force today.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...her-they-still-think-men-should-pay-for-dates
Hmmm, you told him "give me a few weeks to gather my finances together"? I wouldnt bring out issues like that on a first date. If he offered and you cant pay, just say you'll get the next one. ....if a second date actually happens. If not, a gracious thanks is good enough.
I'll say that as a woman, you can definitely get away with this...but guys should definitely not do this LOL...the reason for not going on a first date until a certain time should always be "I'm busy until this time".i essentially said two weeks cus I'm returning to work next week just so he knows I'm not purposely turning him down like most girls do. :) yeah don't worry! I'm not an asshole haha.
I'll say that as a woman, you can definitely get away with this...but guys should definitely not do this LOL...the reason for not going on a first date until a certain time should always be "I'm busy until this time".
But giving someone a solid date either way is certainly the way to go instead of leaving them flailing in the wind.
Yes I agree, not constantly...but just when settling on a time for the first date. You should definitely stick to that date no matter what.well I think that depends on the woman. If the guy I'm pursuing is having financial issues, it's totally fine and understandable. I don't have my life together and I don't expect you to either. But it also depends on your age I guess. I think constantly saying "I'm busy until this time" might give off the impression that I'm just being strung along
And this is dating. People aren't trying suss out whether or not the person they're going out with is an "equal partner" or not. It's about attraction and having an experience.
Exactly, I question the percentage of dating that make it to the 2nd/3rd date...or how often intimacy happens on the 1st/2nd date, for people that say otherwise. The question is, how do you settle the bill...not, how do people only interested in dating people wanting a monogamous long term relationship based only on personality and how you like someone as a person. At worst, people that don't offer are leaving alot of sex on the table.
Depends on who did the inviting. If I invite you out to eat/drink/see a movie then I'll pay for the whole show. If you invite me, I'll offer to split the bill.
Don't cherry-pick. I literally said that people expect different outcomes from a date based on how it goes. Don't know where you got sex as being the only factor. And, sex doesn't mean that an emotional attraction hasn't happened or won't happen. And even further more, people who DO date just for sex and are honest about that with a person who is also okay with that, are not desperate.Smells a little desperate, judging your success at dating by how soon you get sex. Personally I prefer to limit my partners to people who I'm emotionally attracted to. For others, especially young'uns I imagine, I'm sure someone expecting a free night would be no problem. For me, it's a real turn-off. The amount of times I've turned down sex this year outweighs the other way around.
Wait, so why did you insist on paying if she asked you out?I've always thought of it as if you're asking someone to dinner, you pay. Even if it's multiple times.
If you start officially dating then you take turns or split or whatever.
In fact last year a girl essentially asked me to dinner, and I still insisted on paying, although to be fair she paid our tab at the bar afterwards.
Don't cherry-pick. I literally said that people expect different outcomes from a date based on how it goes. Don't know where you got sex as being the only factor. And, sex doesn't mean that an emotional attraction hasn't happened or won't happen. And even further more, people who DO date just for sex and are honest about that with a person who is also okay with that, are not desperate.
And again...if you have a long "lead time" of getting to know someone before you go on a date, that's fine, but that's not the majority of dating experiences. Plus, the average single person isn't turning down sex from someone they had a nice time with and are attracted to.
Like I said...I haven't needed to wear a suit to a job interview...but I wouldn't recommend that to the average person.
Wait, so why did you insist on paying if she asked you out?
I really don't get this "whoever asks the other out pays" rule some people have.
Again, you are projecting your own dating style on others, and implying that I'm speaking for my own dating style.I didn't cherry pick, you mentioned missing out on sex twice in the same paragraph.
Also, I don't have a long lead time for online dating. I usually ask someone out in 10 messages or less.
The first date should never feel like an interview, talking about what you do and how long you've been living somewhere. That is what a bad first date is. No wonder some people feel like they have to pay the bill to sell themselves.
Yeah, I can understand trying to be the gentleman. That was kind of what I was getting at with the whole "if you ask someone out to dinner, you pay." It's more about a guy being the gentleman than it is about him being the one to asked her out.I don't know. I was drunk and trying to be the gentleman. Maybe also because I usually pay so it was instinctive.
Thinking about it I guess it's kind of situational and depends on the people. This girl and I had hung out at work happy hours and stuff, so were kind of familiar with each other.
The first date should never feel like an interview, talking about what you do and how long you've been living somewhere. That is what a bad first date is.
Again, you are projecting your own dating style on others, and implying that I'm speaking for my own dating style.
The fact that you pointed out that I mentioned sex twice (OMG THE HORROR) says as much. It's the #1 reason people date. Shallow surface information isn't any real connection or indicative of some romantic progression from stranger to more than that. That takes time and unless your first date lasts weeks in a row there isn't much you are getting from a person that is beyond what you would say in a job interview.
And...you don't get to decide what is a good or bad date for someone. Plenty of people are not comfortable with getting too close at first and with the information they share. Alot of people don't want an emotional connection. Others only date until that have that. None of that is for anyone to judge.
People are twisting the question the OP posted...it's literally "how do you settle the bill"...not "how is the best way to find a soul mate".
And...you don't get to decide what is a good or bad date for someone. Plenty of people are not comfortable with getting too close at first and with the information they share. Alot of people don't want an emotional connection. Others only date until that have that. None of that is for anyone to judge.
People are twisting the question the OP posted...it's literally "how do you settle the bill"...not "how is the best way to find a soul mate".
hm what's your idea of a good first date? Like what should be discussed?
And the two are related. Because I'm looking for a soulmate. Well, perhaps not a soulmate, but at least someone I'm actually having fun with.
And my paying for the meal should have no influence on how fun the date has been or how my date thinks of me. That should be based on how much fun we have, on if there's some sort of chemistry. Not on if I offered to pick up the bill or not.
It's the opposite for me even, if someone expects me to pay for the meal, I'm not interested. I'll pay for it to avoid the hassle, but there won't be a second date.
I'll offer to pay if the date went well and say something like "you can get the next one" or something along those lines implying I'm interested in a second date. If the date was boring and I have no interest in meeting up again I will always ask for separate bills. If the date was horrible I'm dine and dashing and sticking them with the full bill.
And the two are related. Because I'm looking for a soulmate. Well, perhaps not a soulmate, but at least someone I'm actually having fun with.
And my paying for the meal should have no influence on how fun the date has been or how my date thinks of me. That should be based on how much fun we have, on if there's some sort of chemistry. Not on if I offered to pick up the bill or not.
It's the opposite for me even, if someone expects me to pay for the meal, I'm not interested. I'll pay for it to avoid the hassle, but there won't be a second date.
And I'm fine with all of this! Then there was no reason to target my posts because I'm speaking to what is the general advice I would give based on the experiences of myself and people around me. I'm not speaking for myself persay or to what either of you specifically should do in your situations. Everyone is different of course. I haven't replied to anyone here that said "no you should not pay", just stating my response to the question.Yes, that's why I said earlier that if your aim is to get laid, then go for it and pay. When the OP asked how I settle the bill, I answered and said why.
The question has no context unless you combine it with what we're talking about. My answer was Split - okay why? Because it filters out people that see dating differently than I do. Your answer is Pay - okay why? Because it's statistically most likely to please someone. Giving my reason as "I want to find someone on equal footing as me" isn't twisting the OP any more than "because you'll get the sex."
Usually you just start by expanding on a topic you've mentioned during messages. For example, I have in my profile that I think Mulan has the best Disney soundtrack and I get a ton of messages about that. So boom, right away during the date you can talk about Disney and Pixar. I also have a fun Mulan drinking game, so I can talk about that. One girl then mentioned she always does Disney costumes for Halloween, and then I can talk about my Halloween costumes. Then we talk about whether Halloween or Christmas is the better holiday (it's Halloween). Maybe then what's the worst Xmas gift we've ever gotten.
Before long you've long forgotten what started the convo, you just know it's 3 hours and 3 drinks later and you've found chemistry. The above is just one example, of course. To me "what do you do" is what happens when there's an awkward silence because you've both run out of interesting/funny things to say.
To Akita One's point of course, sometimes "what do you do" is appropriate, if for example you don't date outside your own financial bracket. Though usually those people are also the ones not looking for hookups.
Usually you just start by expanding on a topic you've mentioned during messages. For example, I have in my profile that I think Mulan has the best Disney soundtrack and I get a ton of messages about that. So boom, right away during the date you can talk about Disney and Pixar. I also have a fun Mulan drinking game, so I can talk about that. One girl then mentioned she always does Disney costumes for Halloween, so we look at those and then I can talk about my Halloween costumes. Then we talk about whether Halloween or Christmas is the better holiday (it's Halloween). Maybe then what's the worst Xmas gift we've ever gotten.