After playing 4-5 hours today, I disagree that the characters "look like dummies". They aren't particularly realistic-looking -- a stylistic choice -- but they're expressive and interesting and unique-looking. They look way better than I was expecting, given some of the pre-launch materials.
As self-indulgent as that flowery sentense? 8-)
I said this in the OT, but the whole "I love it, but it's shit! And you're gunna hate it!" thing is so weird. If you like it...maybe others will too (shock, horror)?! All this pretending to know what people will and won't like, in a medium that is inherently subjective, is such a waste of time. A review is but an opinion. Just because there's a score attached doesn't mean it's any more objective, or representative of the common gamer.
Knew some reviewers could not be trusted to represent Shenmue III fairly. Knew it.Yikes at these not advancing the story enough takes. One review said this and it's not true at all. I'd be interested to know what "advancing the story" means to the person who said that? You literally learn a shit ton in the first area of this game, I'd say on equal measure to the whole of 2. Then there's the whole giant second city area that progresses the story even more. I have no idea what they expect or want if they're saying this.
Do they? That's news to me. Sounds like a Shenmue III thing.AA games usually suffer bc it's criticized for lack of AAA production.
If a reviewer is judging the game for not concluding the story, then they are not reviewing it fairly. I knew from the second I Kickstarted the game it would not be the conclusion. It was not designed to be. Why would you judge something by a metric it wasn't going to fulfill? That's the worst possible way to approach art.
If it takes them this long to make 3 parts, we will never get that many.
Well, if it's made for the fans, it shouldn't matter to you.If a reviewer is judging the game for not concluding the story, then they are not reviewing it fairly. I knew from the second I Kickstarted the game it would not be the conclusion. It was not designed to be. Why would you judge something by a metric it wasn't going to fulfill? That's the worst possible way to approach art.
U mean because the studio to make 3 was disbanded and the Yu hasn't made a game since. But now we kickstarted him into making a game now that has a full team of developers. So no it won't take that long again now, it baffles me how so many of y'all are ignorant to the history of this game or how once dead franchise are reborn againIf it takes them this long to make 3 parts, we will never get that many.
Enh, I totally get someone being unhappy with a one-in-a-lifetime sequel like Shenmue III not concluding the story and any meaningful way. Because the time between Shenmue 2 & 3 was so massive there's a lot of reason to be skeptical that Shenmue 4 (or 5, 6, etc) will ever happen.
Regardless of creative liberties, I 100% understand being disappointed with that.
I do expect revolutionary ideas from Yu Suzuki. This is a man who for years was held up as a peer of Miyamoto, and this is the game he's been sitting on for nearly 20 years. I'd have hoped he'd had thoughts about game design since then, or that he'd implement a truly hardcore fighting system. Shenmue has always held out the promise of being a Virtua Fighter rpg, and something that successfully melds fighting game and rpg mechanics + world design without compromise is still something that's still never fully been achieved.no one expected a truly revolutionary experience from this game, most people just wanted a conclusion to the story but the game doesn´t really deliver on that
it's looks like a ps2 gen game with community made hires texture packs and models.
Just as you can't fault a painting for not being a sculpture, or a fighting game for not being an adventure platformer, or a comedy for not being scary enough, you can't fault a game for not delivering a conclusion it never promised. It doesn't belong in the review. You want to be disappointed in the story this specific game intended to tell, good, that will be helpful criticism. But the minute you add something the art cannot fulfill you lose your credit as a critic.
But it DID move the story forward.It absolutely does. "Not moving the story forward" is a valid criticism when the story is one of the biggest tent pole features of the series. In the view of a lot of people, the only thing that Shenmue has to offer as an IP in 2019 is an ending and it appears that Shenmue 3 squandered that opportunity. A shame.
When you're working within the confines of this kind of budget to deliver a continuation of a story and have to deliver a Shenmue-sized game, I doubt being "revolutionary" is the top of your list of things to do. Shenmue III is a distillation of how Yu Suzuki imagined the series would evolve whilst still remaining true. The man doesn't play games, he doesn't look at trends. So it's quite likely that he's not looking to 1up the innovation that we've had in open worlds since 2002. Like I said, the budget probably couldn't even allow for it. His job has been to deliver a worthy Shenmue sequel and he seems to have accomplished that with apolomb.I do expect revolutionary ideas from Yu Suzuki. This is a man who for years was held up as a peer of Miyamoto, and this is the game he's been sitting on for nearly 20 years. I'd have hoped he'd had thoughts about game design since then, or that he'd implement a truly hardcore fighting system. Shenmue has always held out the promise of being a Virtua Fighter rpg, and something that successfully melds fighting game and rpg mechanics + world design without compromise is still something that's still never fully been achieved.
I'm that guy described in the Japanpop review who was completely swept up in the world of the first two games, and always thought if I were to quit gaming that a Shenmue III would be the one last game that I would have to play.
Hopefully, having played the first two when they were new I'll be able to put myself back in that place and fully appreciate this one. But it is disappointing if Suzuki isn't delivering on his own potential as a designer.
First of all, it DOES move the story forward. The reviewer is lying.It absolutely does. "Not moving the story forward" is a valid criticism when the story is one of the biggest tent pole features of the series. In the view of a lot of people, the only thing that Shenmue has to offer as an IP in 2019 is an ending and it appears that Shenmue 3 squandered that opportunity so that the series can forever live in narrative purgatory. A shame.
It does move the story forward, though. I haven't even left the first village yet and there's already new plot information. "A lot of the people" seemingly were not following this game's development at all since Suzuki said from the start that Shenmue III would not complete the game's story. If anyone expected otherwise it's 100% their fault.It absolutely does. "Not moving the story forward" is a valid criticism when the story is one of the biggest tent pole features of the series. In the view of a lot of people, the only thing that Shenmue has to offer as an IP in 2019 is an ending and it appears that Shenmue 3 squandered that opportunity so that the series can forever live in narrative purgatory. A shame.
Mais sachez tout de même qu'une fois bouclé après une vingtaine d'heures de jeu en ligne droite, Shenmue III n'aura pas vraiment fait avancer une situation en suspens depuis près de 20 ans.
I know Shenmue is supposed to be like 16 parts long, but the phrase "read the room" really seems applicable here. Maybe if it took almost two decades to get a new game in the series off the ground, it might be worth adapting the original plan a little.
why would i want a rush story and ruin my fav series??Yu is a control freak.
He's probably gaming's equivalent to George Lucas.
It does move the story forward, though. I haven't even left the first village yet and there's already new plot information. "A lot of the people" seemingly were not following this game's development at all since Suzuki said from the start that Shenmue III would not complete the game's story. If anyone expected otherwise it's 100% their fault.
I strongly doubt you are...real fans just wanted more Shenmue. If it takes 2 more games to finish the story, fine by me.
Yu has hinted a Shenmue 5 in interviews. Which is ridiculous. At most we need a 4. And it turns out III doesn't even move the story forward much anyways.
The beginning of Shenmue III is so glacial that any complaint of "rushing" the story is hilarious.
"Buy, don't complain, and get excited for the next product."
If this is your definition of fan, I strongly disagree.
The campaign description was vague, so they can get away with this.
"The story continues as Ryo and Shenhua start off on a new journey that will take them farther into enemy territory, deeper into mystery, and ever closer to their destiny.
Will the mystery of the mirrors be revealed? How is Ryo's father connected to all of this? Will Ryo track down the Chi You Men cartel and face Lan Di in a final showdown?"
But as a fan, I funded this campaign with an expectation of at least finishing an arc. Reviews point it is not what happened.
You know what comes next? Nothing. Shenmue didn't drive sales even at its brightest moment, so the target audience is objectively very limited. I doubt a publisher will fund more chapters. This was a once in a lifetime chance to have a beautiful conclusion of this arc.
I wouldn't buy this if it I didn't fund the campaign already.
i mean did you play 1 though
it's not a story known for moving at breakneck speed, is the thing
It is kinda weird how everyone who had a problem with the story not concluding is labeled as "wrong" or "not getting it".Most Shenmue fans online treat the series like cultists, so it reflects past behavior.
I did play through 1.
But I have also played through 2.
Which advanced the story very much.
Given this is a sequel to 2, not 1, and given 2 is BETTER then 1, it's a reasonable expectation to advance the story very much.
Instead, they regressed
It's fair to have a problem with it not concluding the story, but you should not have been expecting it to since it was said from the start of the campaign that it was not going to. This should not have come as a surprise to anyone who was following the game.It is kinda weird how everyone who had a problem with the story not concluding is labeled as "wrong" or "not getting it".
Like, deliberate or not, if a reviewer played the game and didn't feel satisfied, why wouldn't they share their impressions?
It is kinda weird how everyone who had a problem with the story not concluding is labeled as "wrong" or "not getting it".
Like, deliberate or not, if a reviewer played the game and didn't feel satisfied, why wouldn't they share their impressions?
Few days? And you're going on about the story like you're halfway through the game.Because they're s cult.
The game is great but the story is soooo slowwwwwww.
The beginning is so padded.
I'm a few days in.
That would be them reviewing a game with baggage attached. It would be - as the phrase goes - a you problem (not a Yu problem). I don't think it's a big ask for a professional journo to know about the basics of a game they are reviewing and yes, knowing that it's not the final game in the series is basic info.It is kinda weird how everyone who had a problem with the story not concluding is labeled as "wrong" or "not getting it".
Like, deliberate or not, if a reviewer played the game and didn't feel satisfied, why wouldn't they share their impressions?
Few days? And you're going on about the story like you're halfway through the game.
It is kinda weird how everyone who had a problem with the story not concluding is labeled as "wrong" or "not getting it".
Like, deliberate or not, if a reviewer played the game and didn't feel satisfied, why wouldn't they share their impressions?
Opening is the slowest. Story definitely moves forward especially where I'm at. I'm still in Bailu but 10+ hours ahead.People said the story doesn't advance much. After the opening I'm inclined to believe them.
Knowing doesn't mean liking or approving. Since when is pure intent a good enough excuse if someone still finds it unenjoyable?That would be them reviewing a game with baggage attached. It would be - as the phrase goes - a you problem (not a Yu problem). I don't think it's a big ask for a professional journo to know about the basics of a game they are reviewing and yes, knowing that it's not the final game in the series is basic info.
It's absolutely fine to be disappointed with the story, but the fact that it doesn't end it shouldn't be one of them, IMO. I can understand criticisms for Yu deciding not to end it here, it's definitely a risky move, but that has been clear for a long time.