Read my subsequent reply. I'm not dismissing anything. Again, another awful take.
Also, a video edited to be misleading and support a narrative is propaganda. Plain and simple.
Sure thing, Comrade.
Read my subsequent reply. I'm not dismissing anything. Again, another awful take.
Also, a video edited to be misleading and support a narrative is propaganda. Plain and simple.
They're trying to get her to support the bill. It's pretty simple.
And your continued condescension makes it a pain to debate with you.
I'm condescending to you because I don't think you're engaging in an honest debate where you give a shit about anything the opposing side is saying so I see no reason to afford you that dignity on my end either
Ok, and her response sucked but it certainly doesn't warrant calls for her resignation. It's like people immediately forgot about her long record of progressive legislation just because she was curt to a bunch of kids.
Considering she didn't even get her party's nomination last year, I think the calls for her resignation from California constituents are concerned about more than this. I think some California democrats might want new leadership and this is just one of many long-stewing reasons why.Ok, and her response sucked but it certainly doesn't warrant calls for her resignation. It's like people immediately forgot about her long record of progressive legislation just because she was curt to a bunch of kids.
Ok, and her response sucked but it certainly doesn't warrant calls for her resignation. It's like people immediately forgot about her long record of progressive legislation just because she was curt to a bunch of kids.
Ok, and her response sucked but it certainly doesn't warrant calls for her resignation. It's like people immediately forgot about her long record of progressive legislation just because she was curt to a bunch of kids.
It's like some people haven't forgotten about how terrible she actually is all the way back to her being the Mayor of San Fran while courting southern KKK supporters.
Considering she didn't even get her party's nomination last year, I think the calls for her resignation from California constituents are concerned about more than this. I think some California democrats might want new leadership and this is just one of many long-stewing reasons why.
Y'all continue to attack Feinstein which only proves my point. Continue to eat yourselves alive. See how that works out for you.
I wasn't aware bringing up that she didn't get her party's nomination in 2018 was considered an attack now.Y'all continue to attack Feinstein which only proves my point. Continue to eat yourselves alive. See how that works out for you.
Y'all continue to attack Feinstein which only proves my point. Continue to eat yourselves alive. See how that works out for you.
Let's be honest... who here would back a government plan that would ban consumption of gasoline for cars and limit air travel? Oh and the corresponding lifestyle changes? In the next 12-15 years.
same
lol yes a progressive pro police/law and order candidate who bashes unions, rejects legislation for gay benefits, sends police after gay bathhouses, supports a terrible war, and confederate flag apologist! What a great progressive!
Y'all continue to attack Feinstein which only proves my point. Continue to eat yourselves alive. See how that works out for you.
Progressives have a right to better representation and an obligation to demand it.
Oh I guess 'tHe rUsSiAnS' must be colluding to take down this powerful white woman again.
Feinstein is and has always been a ghoul. Power hungry, rich, completely out of touch and don't give a fuck.
Has her history with the Confederate flag been posted in the forms of the comedic stylings of The Dollop yet?
I suggest that everyone give this a listen.
Is Feinstein the problem? No, everyone else is misogynistic.lol yes a progressive pro police/law and order candidate who bashes unions, rejects legislation for gay benefits, sends police after gay bathhouses, supports a terrible war, and confederate flag apologist! What a great progressive!
also betting half of these people will turn around and scream "ageist" at people thinking bernie's too old for president
You act like she's the senator of a red or purple state.Y'all continue to attack Feinstein which only proves my point. Continue to eat yourselves alive. See how that works out for you.
Y'all continue to attack Feinstein which only proves my point. Continue to eat yourselves alive. See how that works out for you.
It's like some people haven't forgotten about how terrible she actually is all the way back to her being the Mayor of San Fran while courting southern KKK supporters.
Cradling dianne Feinstein in my arms, that these vicious blows fall upon my body rather than hersY'all continue to attack Feinstein which only proves my point. Continue to eat yourselves alive. See how that works out for you.
I'm not all that familiar with Feinstein's record but not all (D)s are created equal. Some are cool like Lieu. Some are lame like Manchin.
Some live in safe seats and can be replaced by more progressive (D)s. Feinstein's one of them apparently.
Sure, like that.And there are some that do real damage to peoples lives through policy because they only want to lord over people and relive southern dreams.
Sure, like that.
I'm not from Cali so I couldn't say for sure. There's just this general rush to defend anyone with a (D) because people think that being critical of a (D) means they want an (R), when in reality what they want is a clearer (D) and not a (D) that's kind of (R) shaped.
Some would just call that...pragmatism.
Anyways, this isn't simply another policy debate about $15 minimum wage or even healthcare nor even our fragile basically nonexistent social safety net, though they all ofc play big parts in stemming the tide of what's to come (at least for USA citizens, sorry Middle East, North Africa, and countless islanders).
This is about an ongoing and growing planet extinction event that's going to impact those under the age of 50 the most. Internships are not worth shit in the world these kids are inheriting. Lame ass incremental "I hear you and I'm thinking about it far far far away from the plebs on the street" is no longer going to cut it. Romneyesque actions that amount to little more than "we'll handle it behind closed doors so shut the hell up and wait" should be called the hell out.
These kids aren't just automatons engorging on their parents' wills, nor are the kids abroad walking out of schools over this same existential threat. They are self-aware victims of our greed, our excess, and our unwillingness to talk matter of factly about why we're in this situation in the first place (corporations and old money to speak of a few), much less how to actually manage what's coming next that's beneficial to all, not just the top 1% in the richest nations, as we've been doing the last few decades.
Sure, like that.
I'm not from Cali so I couldn't say for sure. There's just this general rush to defend anyone with a (D) because people think that being critical of a (D) means they want an (R), when in reality what they want is a clearer (D) and not a (D) that's kind of (R) shaped.
The actual teenager in the video seemed perfectly capable of speaking her mind and having read the actual bullets points (at least) of the green new deal. The much younger children though were parroting/repeating things. My partner has been a teacher for 10 years and and had the same read. I just stated my opinion and yes I was an adolescent at some point.
if you want to continue you could make an effort but if you don't think you can then stopping is probably the best idea, yes
my tone is a response to the pre-existing tone of this thread and I'm engaging this thread on it's own terms
Are the kids wrong? When does it turn from "parrotting" into their actual opinion? What age specifically?
This video is literal propaganda. A James O'Keefe style selective editing hit job that removes all context to create a narrative.
And even when the full 15 minute video came out, you still have people unable to admit they were tricked.
Are the kids wrong? When does it turn from "parrotting" into their actual opinion? What age specifically?
This video is literal propaganda. A James O'Keefe style selective editing hit job that removes all context to create a narrative.
And even when the full 15 minute video came out, you still have people unable to admit they were tricked.
It's because the full video doesn't create a context where she looks any better.