Well, its also a pretty safe bet with From Software. They have proven they can deliever games without awful delays and seemingly on budget (as far as I know).Their highest rated game this gen and all thanks to them not meddling with the developement. I guess it can be seen like a slap in the face in a sense
Speedrun time lol.
That was for the majority of the outlets. Major outlets were, however, given review codes a lot early.Niiiiiice.
Also, about what I expected.
Remember that concern thread about Activision not sending out early review copies? That aged like fine wine.
It always makes me sad when people call Edge 'edgy' because they give games low reviews.Naah. I feel like they sometimes score games in a certain way just to stir the pot, or to prove that they are edgy. Hence the "edge" in edge magazine.
Has anyone mentioned game length? I have a hard time understanding how expansive this game is.
It's 92 on OpenCritic. Meta suffers the usual "which platform is which" and weird weighting.
Open has been, for a while now, the superior aggregate service.
Wow that's a lot for a non-RPG. Does the game have a slow pace like the Souls games perhaps?
I'm thinking of traversing the world. Or do you run around and jump into action with little thought?
It's too late for me; OP's fault. I've always thought "Soulsborne" was dumb so why not add to it?
Stop.
No choice. I'm very sorry.
Yep, been exclusive to OpenC once I started the Fantasy League thing... it's much cleaner and nicer. I hate the divided Metacritic thing.It's 92 on OpenCritic. Meta suffers the usual "which platform is which" and weird weighting.
Open has been, for a while now, the superior aggregate service.
Me? Almost immediately. The game? We've heard anywhere between 20-50 hours.I can't look at most of these website due to a work filter. Any word on rough amount of hours to completion?
I won't say much for the sake of spoilers, but rest assured that through multiple endings (some of which drastically alter the path of the latter portions of the game) and other gameplay elements in New Game+, there's plenty of reason to keep revisiting the world of Sekiro.
Read more at https://www.playstationlifestyle.net/2019/03/21/sekiro-shadows-die-twice-review/#TIUO35oq3epIGBXB.99
Perfect, thanks! That's roughly what I was hoping for. Should be able to finish it before Days Gone comes out, though I do tend to take my time with FROM's games. Recently replayed Bloodborne and Dark Souls plus their DLCs. Bloodborne was 60 hours and Dark Souls was 70, and I've played both games a fucking lot.Me? Almost immediately. The game? We've heard anywhere between 20-50 hours.
it was at 91 this morning, at 89 right now on MC. Unless more places tank it, ~ 89-90 MC looks like the final score.
It's only gotten a fraction of what will eventually be its final reviews (11 out of ~70-80 for a game of this scale). The game looks great but it's way too early for people to count their chicks before they hatch.it was at 91 this morning, at 89 right now on MC. Unless more places tank it, ~ 89-90 MC looks like the final score.
It's only gotten a fraction of what will eventually be its final reviews (~70-80 for a game of this scale). The game looks great but it's way too early for people to count their chicks before they hatch.
Which one is more important to the devs and 90% of the people? Metacritic or opencritic? The answer should be obviousThe reviews are split up among 3 platforms. It's not at all indicative of an actual aggregate.
Please people: if you're going to use an aggregate, use an actual aggregate.
Which one is more important to the devs and 90% of the people? Metacritic or opencritic? The answer should be obvious
Every souls game for me is at least 70-80 hours in the first run...Wait a sec, there's no way this game is 50 hours right? Was it IGN that said that? I was expecting 15-20.