I don't necessarily disagree with you but you are arguing on a very theoretical level. In reality there is no way to win elections for labour without those racists votes. So if you don't want to turn into racists you need to find a way to get those people to vote for you.People also need to get real and accept you don't shift the radicalised in your country by pandering to them. If you do that you get America, where the Overton window shifts soo far the party calling themselves "leftists" resemble centrists at best, centre-right, most of the time.
Scotland paid attention when Margaret Thatcher ruined the country, maybe for once England should be paying attention when Cameron/May and now Boris ruin England after 15~20 years.
Your threats of "More Tory Governments!" is exactly what Americans do. "Do you want another 4 years of Trump?!!!!". Chances are you are fucking getting it anyway with the state of your electorate, you might as well start the dirty fight for your children's future of calling out and challenging everyone voting against their interests and leaving that legacy behind in the hope younger people pay attention to what you fought against.
So basically cater to the bigots... sounds great for black people like me...
That and Corbyn is way more left than Sanders. Corbyn wouldn't even be able to run in US.The demographics of these countries leans much more heavily white than the US as a whole though. The UK is damn near 90% white while the US is 72% white as of 10 years ago and probably below 70% today.
People also need to get real and accept you don't shift the radicalised in your country by pandering to them. If you do that you get America, where the Overton window shifts soo far the party calling themselves "leftists" resemble centrists at best, centre-right, most of the time.
Scotland paid attention when Margaret Thatcher ruined the country, maybe for once England should be paying attention when Cameron/May and now Boris ruin England after 15~20 years.
Your threats of "More Tory Governments!" is exactly what Americans do. "Do you want another 4 years of Trump?!!!!". Chances are you are fucking getting it anyway with the current state of your electorate, you might as well start the dirty fight now for your children's future of calling out and challenging everyone voting against their interests and leave that legacy behind in the hope younger people pay attention to what you fought against.
What I said above, England has no hope in 5 years, this is a longer "game" than that now.
Also I don't need to take off my Scotland goggles, we'll be leaving this shit-show eventually anyway. Up to the English voting base if it ever wants to properly pay attention to Scotland before we leave you.
I very much call out Scottish Labour too, by the way. But it's for being poundland Tories.
I don't think labour did call people bigots nearly enough (if they did at all) this election. What do you think a "credible party of government" looks like? I'd love to hear more about how being the opposition means they are unelectable and people shouldn't be blamed for voting them in.
Yeah, the demographics made the urban clustering vs rural spread and geographic fptp hit them even harder than we are seeing here.The demographics of these countries leans much more heavily white than the US as a whole though. The UK is damn near 90% white while the US is 72% white as of 10 years ago and probably below 70% today.
You don't need to turn into racists to target key demographics.So basically cater to the bigots... sounds great for black people like me...
He didn't with his policies did he? Which is my point. So many people think Labour have to go more centre just to get bigots on board. Which once again leaves behind black people like me.Catering to bigots is exactly what Corbyn and Labour tried this election, by focusing on leave seats. It's what this article is pointing out. It doesn't work.
That and Corbyn is way more left than Sanders. Corbyn wouldn't even be able to run in US.
You sadly do in the UK. It's why Brexit wonYou don't need to turn into racists to target key demographics.
Free broadband is nice and all but it caters mostly to demographics that already vote labour anyway.
At some point, the Labour Party will have to reconcile the fact that their most successful government also caused the atrocities of Iraq, and that you can neither wholeheartedly reject Blair's legacy, nor unabashedly defend it.
"But Iraq!" is not a reasonable rebuttal of the claim that Blair's government was more progressive in the domestic sphere than any other in most of our lifetimes, but it's not something that can be rejected either. It's a scar running down the party.
The internal theories for why Corbyn's team targeted these "deep blue" seats are twofold. One is what a critic called "deranged optimism" — a desire to fight a bold campaign after the party's near miss two years ago. Another insider argued that Murphy and her close friend Len McCluskey, the general secretary of Unite, imposed the strategy in order to "prove wrong" pro-EU MPs such as Sir Keir Starmer and Emily Thornberry, both now leadership contenders, who had long argued that Labour should become the party of remain.
I don't necessarily disagree with you but you are arguing on a very theoretical level. In reality there is no way to win elections for labour without those racists votes. So if you don't want to turn into racists you need to find a way to get those people to vote for you.
That's not gonna happen if you have a bad candidate like corbyn, bad PR teams like labour and corbyn had(have?) and you need to stop smearing your own people because they're not pure enough leftists. Couple that with a bunch of topics that actually cater to key demographics and you'll be in a better situation.
People need to be more pragmatic and less ideology focused.
Yeah, the demographics made the urban clustering vs rural spread and geographic fptp hit them even harder than we are seeing here.
Yeah, Corbyn hates big corps etc.Wasn't he so far left he was against the EU? Horseshoe theory is real.
Labour positioned themselves on the fence and in return bled remainers and leavers.wait wait wait, non-UK person here. Are you telling me that Labour didn't position itself as the remain party? And that was supposed to be a good strategy because...?
How was the turnout for the "remain" voters?
wait wait wait, non-UK person here. Are you telling me that Labour didn't position itself as the remain party? And that was supposed to be a good strategy because...?
How was the turnout for the "remain" voters?
Right, so how does this compare to what Democrats are doing in the US? I see some people saying Biden's the chosen one to defeat trump but isn't that what you're arguing against?
wait wait wait, non-UK person here. Are you telling me that Labour didn't position itself as the remain party? And that was supposed to be a good strategy because...?
How was the turnout for the "remain" voters?
You can't just sit back on this platform and attitude and hope for a "generational change" in what 20, 30 years. The "well we know we're right, let's just hope the young people all grow up and vote for us" thing isn't a realistic option. Society is gradually moving further left regardless, but within that gradual movement you're still going to have swings, and the Conservatives are following that gradual movement of societal ideologies too.
Like it or not in five years and ten years there's going to be elections that need to be fought, and they're both opportunities to if not win then gain stronger footholds within Parliament and the electorate.
Because the alternative is to let the opposition be in Government indefinitely and let that change happen even slower.
wait wait wait, non-UK person here. Are you telling me that Labour didn't position itself as the remain party? And that was supposed to be a good strategy because...?
The only thing we know isn't going to happen is Corbyn in No. 10.Labour are not the Democrats. Corbyn is not Sanders. The UK is not America.
Stop trying to make fetch happen. We know your agenda and it isn't successful. Thanks for playing.
wait wait wait, non-UK person here. Are you telling me that Labour didn't position itself as the remain party? And that was supposed to be a good strategy because...?
How was the turnout for the "remain" voters?
No offence mate but i don't think the kind of change you're looking for is ever gonna get voted into a large european country so this all or nothing attitude a lot of people have is gonna get us nowhere but more conservative goverments.At this point let me just say if this is the best yourself and other English people can argue for, can you even begin to tut-tut Scottish people for wanting to leave the UK?
My next favourite is "Once we get our Labour Government in, then we can put in progressive policy on the sly!". Totally forgetting that those you bring forward to run your Labour party, if they are hardcore Blairities, or Red Tories, will indeed run the country as if it's Tory-lite. Things like University educational for all will still be Communism. Forgetting that education is one of the best tools to lift up impoverished communities, especially minority communities. Cause the average low-income black kids family can handle 30-40k of Uni debt.
So you'll never really get any decent change anyway, other than a 5~10 year stint of Tory-lite before probably going full Tory again as the electorate has never really been properly fought/challenged.
Says the Lib DemI have no kind words for the Labour election strategy. Utterly, totally bonkers, designed to give the Tories as large a majority as possible.
It's not. I don't think any of the candidates, even Sanders, are arguing for the type of campaign that was done here. You absolutely should be triaging areas that you're losing support in, it just shouldn't be at the cost of actively pushing into enemy territory that's moving your direction. (As pointed out in PoliERA, THE OC now has a majority Dem registration for the first time ever, a year after every single House seat in the country flipped GOP->Dem)Right, so how does this compare to what Democrats are doing in the US? I see some people saying Biden's the chosen one to defeat trump but isn't that what you're arguing against?
I'm not a politician. I'm not a labour member or a member of any political party. I don't "win" or "lose" elections.And look what happened the last time their leader called a voter a bigot, even if he was right.
Blaming people for being wrong for not voting for you is not a winning strategy.
It'd be like if Democrats decided not to have any position whatsoever on healthcare. Its choosing to ignore a key relevant issue for... reasons.As someone from across the pond, why didn't Labour present themselves as a party for "Remainers"? It seemed so bizarre.
You see, this is the problem- you throw the most domestically progressive government in any of our lifetimes under the bus because it wasn't ideologically pure enough for you.
Blair's government did far more good for the people of Britain than Corbyn's merry band of unelectable no-hopers EVER will.
Not really. Blair started the shitting on benefits as well. Then blamed immigrants for not integrating even though integrating is a 2 way street. Blair was the start of the country being even more trash. People not effected by Blair just see him as some sort of god. Not all flawed people should be kept around to chat shit all time. But because Blair is a white guy he is allowed to still have his views platformed, which white people love.Thankfully we are all adults who are able to discuss individual accomplishments and failures of such complex matters like foreign and domestic policy and don't resort to GOP-esque mentally lazy killer argument/ "gotchas" when discussing said individual and somewhat self contained policy achievements/ failures on their own merits.
The Iraq war is is very much relevant if you want to address Blair's premiership as a whole or his foreign policy in particular ( similar to Obama and dronestrikes) but it is so fucking mentally lazy to shout "dead Iraqis !!!" at someone talking about his domestic policies and his ability to get elected in the first place.
Like, you can hate Blair/Obama all you want as persons/ for their foreign policy
but that doesn't mean that there isn't merit in analysing and learning from flawed or even failed individuals.
I mean they had a policy but it was that they're gonna do a different deal with the EU on it but don't argue for it or against it in the referendum about the deal.It'd be like if Democrats decided not to have any position whatsoever on healthcare. Its choosing to ignore a key relevant issue for... reasons.
Jess Phillips is transphobic and is racist... she will do well in the UKThis. My dream ticket would be Keir Starmer as leader and Jess Philips as deputy and a set of electable, progressive policies (and as little influence from Unite as possible) to get Boris out. If that makes me a red Tory, so be it.
After experiencing 08, 16 and part of 20, "way too loyal to people they need to cut" has become a mega gigantic red flag for me.I've seen a lot of political action plans in my day.
Ones like this result when ideology and loyalty are valued above everything else.
It's rarely a recipe for success.
It's not. I don't think any of the candidates, even Sanders, are arguing for the type of campaign that was done here. You absolutely should be triaging areas that you're losing support in, it just shouldn't be at the cost of actively pushing into enemy territory that's moving your direction. (As pointed out in PoliERA, THE OC now has a majority Dem registration for the first time ever, a year after every single House seat in the country flipped GOP->Dem)
The Biden argument is that he's uniquely good at triaging those areas (his poll numbers among people who don't like either him or Trump are actually like 80/8 compared to Hillary's 35/65 or something like that, so there's a real argument for it in the crosstabs) but both Warren and Sanders would also be attempting to walk and chew gum. The thing about Labour's approach here is that they decided to run while chucking the gum under a bus.
No offence mate but i don't think the kind of change you're looking for is ever gonna get voted into a large european country so this all or nothing attitude a lot of people have is gonna get us nowhere but more conservative goverments.
As an american, it baffles me that Labour was not a remain party or really had any hardline stance on Brexit.
As someone from across the pond, why didn't Labour present themselves as a party for "Remainers"? It seemed so bizarre.