User banned (1 month): inflammatory generalisation
People seem to be real quick to throw those protesters to the pigs...
What gives, seriously?
Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds.
People seem to be real quick to throw those protesters to the pigs...
What gives, seriously?
I was under the impression that the local violence situation got objectively worse in that area, no?
This is a BIG issue lately. Some other topic had sources from some shithead that had a tweet pinned up about trans folk being mental. Choose better sources folks.I think this is the right thing to do. The longer this goes on, the worst it gets.
Although..... this thread, we have to get some better sources. Jack Prosobiec is literally a trump goon QAnon fuckhead conspiracy theorist. He advocates the white genocide conspiracy theory, was one of the early promoters of PizzaGate, and he works for OANN.
fluffydelusions please remove that tweet from the OP and get better sources.
I was under the impression that the local violence situation got objectively worse in that area, no?
This is a BIG issue lately. Some other topic had sources from some shithead that had a tweet pinned up about trans folk being mental. Choose better sources folks.
That sounds plausible, hm.There were also objectively far more people than there are normally. Seattle generally has 250-400 reported shooting incidents a year as is; they just rarely attract national attention
Be happy when Resetera takes off its mask once in awhile to appeal that "no, we really DO need the police to bash some heads"People seem to be real quick to throw those protesters to the pigs...
What gives, seriously?
Wait so what happened in the CHAZ that apparently set back the movement or w/e and is different from any other time something like this has happened?
Yeah, it's just unfortunate that some people had to die over this.This was one of the dumbest activism projects.
It was not sustainable at all.
I wanted concrete examples and not rhetoric, thanksThe narrative the protests are trying to create is that lack of confrontational policing and particularly police brutality have no effective downsides.
The narrative CHOP creates is that as soon as you tell the police they can't beat people up you get a gaggle of fucking morons creating The Seattle Jungle 2.0 on your front lawn overnight. And that you cannot, in practical terms, solve the problem it creates without violently confrontational police presence.
Needless to say, this is not the look anyone wants for the protests.
I support the sentiment, but when you have the state's boot on your neck they will pounce eventually. That's my issue with it. It's tactics, not strategy.Yeah, it's just unfortunate that some people had to die over this.
I thought this was dumb from the start, but I didn't think anyone would die over it.
Sure and it utterly failed at proving they don't need law enforcement.
That's not the narrative CHOP creates, that's the narrative you have created, and have decided to share on this forum.The narrative CHOP creates is that as soon as you tell the police they can't beat people up you get a gaggle of fucking morons creating The Seattle Jungle 2.0 on your front lawn overnight. And that you cannot, in practical terms, solve the problem it creates without violently confrontational police presence.
Yeah, it's remarkable for the Occupy protests to look organized & moderated in retrospect - but CHOP pulled it off.Idk about that. Occupy never had people getting shot in their vicinity. Occupy also had enumerated goals that were very possible politically. Journalists, academics, and such always were at Occupy.
That's not the narrative CHOP creates, that's the narrative you have created, and have decided to share on this forum.
People seem to be real quick to throw those protesters to the pigs...
What gives, seriously?
The narrative the protests are trying to create is that lack of confrontational policing and particularly police brutality have no effective downsides.
The narrative CHOP creates is that as soon as you tell the police they can't beat people up you get a gaggle of fucking morons creating The Seattle Jungle 2.0 on your front lawn overnight. And that you cannot, in practical terms, solve the problem it creates without violently confrontational police presence.
Needless to say, this is not the look anyone wants for the protests.
No that's absolutely the narrative CHOP creates. I live next to it and it's so fucking horrible waking up at 2 AM to the sound of gun shots. I've lived here for years and never heard them before. Do you live near it?That's not the narrative CHOP creates, that's the narrative you have created, and have decided to share on this forum.
It shouldn't be surprising that medium-term activist projects aren't perfect, are exploited at all times by media groups to be sensationalised, as well as being high stress situations due to the threat of state violence at all times. Which, turns out, was a correct fear, as it seems that as soon as the police decide to do something about it, supposedly progressive spaces cheer on the police.
My understanding is that these clearly contradictory contentions aren't emanating from the same block of individuals.Went from "abolish the police" to "glad the cops are going in" lol.
You can be tired of it, but you just suggested that systemic police violence is acceptable in order to prevent a CHOP from occuring. I get that YOU don't necessarily agree with that view, but then why give it oxygen?I live and work in Seattle as an essential worker. Everyone is sick of this. The fire department is sick of it. The EMTs and hospitals are sick of it. The residents of the neighborhood are sick of it. Everyone on both sides of the issue is sick to death of the mayor's handling of it.
At best it was Seattle's hipster-protesters and homeless population wresting the reigns of the protest away from the groups that started it. At worst it's an easy example for anyone who wants to point at as to why the police can't be abolished here. In reality, it's an ugly blight that never produced anything of value to the actual BLM movement that it effectively supplanted here in the city.
We're also tired of having movements co-opted and manipulated into bullshit where black teenagers are getting murdered in the zone that was supposed to be created because of a black man getting murdered and claiming to have the moral high ground. At that point what are you? You think we're gonna applaud the effort after your self-appointed force straight up executes a black teen? Of course we're gonna turn their asses over to the cops. They were no better than cops.Glad to see that some people here are willing to throw these protesters under the bus because they're already "tired of everything". No shit, black people have been tired of dealing with systemic oppression for decades and want actual deep-level change, not just "black lives matter" signs painted into roads and media companies covering their asses.
Glad to see that some people here are willing to throw these protesters under the bus because they're already "tired of everything". No shit, black people have been tired of dealing with systemic oppression for decades and want actual deep-level change, not just "black lives matter" signs painted into roads and media companies covering their asses.
We're also tired of having movements co-opted and manipulated into bullshit where black teenagers are getting murdered in the zone that was supposed to be created because of a black man getting murdered and claiming to have the moral high ground. At that point what are you? You think we're gonna applaud the effort after your self-appointed force straight up executes a black teen? Of course we're gonna turn their asses over to the cops. They were no better than cops.
This is a bit confusing to me because isn't that supposed to be the point of the zone?You can be tired of it, but you just suggested that systemic police violence is acceptable in order to prevent a CHOP from occuring. I get that YOU don't necessarily agree with that view, but then why give it oxygen?
This place was plastered all over right wing media and social media, had people flocking in from all over to come to it, had tons of right wing agitators constantly demagoguing about it and showing up there. The city essentially abandoned it, removing the police presence and purposefully not replacing that presence with anything else, intentionally abdicating responsibility for the citizens. They did that specifically so when things devolved (which was inevitable under these conditions) the city could send in law enforcement to just do the same shit they always do.
Glad to see that some people here are willing to throw these protesters under the bus because they're already "tired of everything". No shit, black people have been tired of dealing with systemic oppression for decades and want actual deep-level change, not just "black lives matter" signs painted into roads and media companies covering their asses.
Pretty hard to determine what the 'point' of the zone is given its nature, but yes removal of police presence was the main thing. However, removal of police presence doesn't necessitate that city government abandons the place entirely. People who advocate for police abolition are not advocating for a bunch of CHOPs, where the seats of power with resources just abandon segments of a city and leave it to random citizens with no resources to 'figure it out'. It's not good municipal governance to essentially say "I'm taking my toys and going home".This is a bit confusing to me because isn't that supposed to be the point of the zone?
Eh, the city government didn't abandon it entirely. They still had ambulance, fire services, and were still supplying electricity and water. The only difference was literally in their being no police presence.Pretty hard to determine what the 'point' of the zone is given its nature, but yes removal of police presence was the main thing. However, removal of police presence doesn't necessitate that city government abandons the place entirely. People who advocate for police abolition are not advocating for a bunch of CHOPs, where the seats of power with resources just abandon segments of a city and leave it to random citizens with no resources to 'figure it out'. It's not good municipal governance to essentially say "I'm taking my toys and going home".
And the overwhelming narrative of this thread, to me, is that the point isn't to go back, but that there is a vast gulf between status-quo and CHAZ.I disagree with the overwhelming narrative of this thread. Yes this experiment hasn't been a resounding success. The point isn't to go back to what we had before though. Fuck Seattle Cops, they've shown their ass since this shit started.
Just feels like that ire is better spent on SPD and the mayor.
And the overwhelming narrative of this thread, to me, is that the point isn't to go back, but that there is a vast gulf between status-quo and CHAZ.
Weren't ambulance services not actually entering the zone and relying on private citizens to bring patients to an agreed upon location to pick them up from? I get why they would do that, worried about EMT safety and everything, but that still makes a difference in the quality of service if you are relying on random citizens to bring someone to a certain place before an ambulance can actually get to them. I've read some reporting to that effect. Ik they didn't turn the water or power off (pretty sure that would've been illegal for them to do regardless).Eh, the city government didn't abandon it entirely. They still had ambulance, fire services, and were still supplying electricity and water. The only difference was literally in their being no police presence.
this more or less ultimately speaks of what would happen with community security. You just end up with even less qualified people in power.
sad that it failed.
I think if it were planned better it could have worked. It seemed like it was an idea thrown together in the heat of a moment with hefty ideals but little actual planning.
Would love to see something like this again in the future that was thoughtfully planned out.
They also had no resources.Would need to be significantly larger to be sustainable and at some size you get into "too small to be a nation, too big to be a mental institution" territory.
what is the point of hot takes like this?
Do you seriously believe the liberals on this forum are fascists?
I have no idea why it was established and I think the net result of doing that shit was nothing but negative.
You say this like the 'autonomous zone' is some force of nature that exists independent of the city. The city IS chartered to provide services for that neighborhood, the city is still taking tax revenue from those residents. Their power and water bills weren't canceled. You are being intentionally obtuse and disingenuous about this.The city isn't chartered to support and help sustain autonomous zones. What some folks seem to be asking for is an ad-hoc annexation of the area by a non-governmental entity.
Did the commune not attract competent urban planners or land use attorneys?