Only 2 lanes is interesting.
Hopefully the price of these expansion slots come down over time, so by the time the majority of users would require to expand their console, it is more affordable.
Capacity 1TB Flash Memory Custom PCIe Gen4x2 NVMe Form Factor Xbox Series X Storage Expansion Card Limited Warranty 3 years
With USB-C transfer speeds, just get a SATA SSD as external storage. You can probably get 2 TB for the same price as this.
Interesting that it is listed as PCIe 4.0x2, which means the slot is effectively running at PCIe 3.0 speeds. I know they're only rating the drive at 2.4GB/s so it makes sense but puts into perspective some of the hype around next generation games requiring PCIe 4.0 drives.
200$/€ minimum.
Concerning they have so much signage that says xbox series x and not just xbox series - one wonders why microsoft has held off on lockhart this long and if lockhart wont have expandable storage
yes
But minimum speeds will be 2.4 uncompressed and 4.8 compressed, right?4.0 x2 is essentially half the bandwidth that a typical nvme gen. 4 SSD for PC has. That could maybe make it cheaper to avoid the 199 price point but it depends on the greediness of Seagate and the type of cut Microsoft gets for the branding.
Actually I've wondered how this works. Is it right the 'x2' is lanes and therefore the interface in the XSX is 'x4' lanes that are split into to x2 lanes for internal SSD and x2 lanes for the external?
Or am I getting this very wrong?
The idea is that here you don't have to transfer anything and you can bring the card with you to your friends.With USB-C transfer speeds, just get a SATA SSD as external storage. You can probably get 2 TB for the same price as this.
EDIT: Because I worded this a little wonky, what I mean is transfer games from external to internal storage when you want to play them. You should max out the full 600 MB/s
the bargain is same bandwidth as most drives at half the internal pcielanes.I think it's due to the format. Going with M.2 2242 or M.2230 - basically laptop formats - means fewer chips and thus less bandwidth, so they offset it with Gen4, preserving the system format and maybe getting any sort of Gen4 features in the bargain.
I'd love for that to be the case, but I'm assuming there are going to be a lot more 4K assets and uncompressed audio for that "next gen" feel so I'd be surprised if sizes of games went down.I've seen articles/posts mentioning that the switch to SSD will allow game sizes to decrease as a result of faster access to files meaning less duplication of files is needed.
Is this actually a safe assumption to make? With the scumminess of today's gaming industry where the focus is on rushing games out the door and extreme monetization of everything, I see zero reason why companies would put in that additional effort (Especially for cross gen games) when it doesn't change the game quality and doesn't bring in any extra money.
Theres no additional effort here, in fact its easier to access an asset from the same place every time. Not sure how that will translate to cross gen titles- realistically the file sizes should be smaller on the next gen systems comparatively but who knows.I've seen articles/posts mentioning that the switch to SSD will allow game sizes to decrease as a result of faster access to files meaning less duplication of files is needed.
Is this actually a safe assumption to make? With the scumminess of today's gaming industry where the focus is on rushing games out the door and extreme monetization of everything, I see zero reason why companies would put in that additional effort (Especially for cross gen games) when it doesn't change the game quality and doesn't bring in any extra money.
I've seen articles/posts mentioning that the switch to SSD will allow game sizes to decrease as a result of faster access to files meaning less duplication of files is needed.
Is this actually a safe assumption to make? With the scumminess of today's gaming industry where the focus is on rushing games out the door and extreme monetization of everything, I see zero reason why companies would put in that additional effort (Especially for cross gen games) when it doesn't change the game quality and doesn't bring in any extra money.
I have no idea, and would only guess so.
But 2 lanes should be enough for the rated bandwidth. Hopefully it means the card is cheaper?
Guys, Seagate's HDD reliability has absolutely no bearing on their SSD reliability. Even the shittiest SSD out there today is likely to last 10+ years as long as you use it appropriately. A game console is not going to wear out its write cycles either.
4.0 x2 is essentially half the bandwidth that a typical nvme gen. 4 SSD for PC has. That could maybe make it cheaper to avoid the 199 price point but it depends on the greediness of Seagate and the type of cut Microsoft gets for the branding.
I wasn't expecting pricing and preorders today, but this website going live hours before the stream sure is a red flag that we get hardware info today and not just software.
4.0 x2 is essentially half the bandwidth that a typical nvme gen. 4 SSD for PC has. That could maybe make it cheaper to avoid the 199 price point but it depends on the greediness of Seagate and the type of cut Microsoft gets for the branding.
I wasn't expecting pricing and preorders today, but this website going live hours before the stream sure is a red flag that we get hardware info today and not just software.
Most rumours point to it being a DRAMless QLC drive, so they can absolutely hit a $100 price point if there's a desire to do so. $120 would be fair, $150 or more would frankly be a complete rip off. There is precisely zero justification for a $200 price point.
That sucks to hear specially when Samsung's SSDs are some of the most expensive ones in the market
Well their SSDs aren't getting great reviews either.Their spinning rust drives or their SSD drives? They are totally different and not being good at one does not translate to being bad at the other.
Personally this gen I've had both Seagate and WD HDD's die on me (once each).
Will look fine next to a $399 Lockhart thoughHopefully.....I know accessories are marked up but a $199 NVMe would look silly next to a $299 or even $249 Lockhart!
Have MS confirmed that feature?
probably the same as Microsoft's other solution which is copy files to and from an external usb drive.I'll be buying one day one.
Do we know yet start Sonys solution is for their paltry 840gb drive?
That makes sense. The lack of DRAM cache didn't even occur to me, but it makes sense. Though it could lead to lower data transfers over a certain threshold, not to mention the lower lifespan that typically comes with cacheless drives. Pairing QLC NAND with a controller without DRAM cache does not sound like a very good idea to me. Could be why they went with a x2 link.Most rumours point to it being a DRAMless QLC drive, so they can absolutely hit a $100 price point if there's a desire to do so. $120 would be fair, $150 or more would frankly be a complete rip off. There is precisely zero justification for a $200 price point.
The one in OP lol
I also think they will be catering to different markets, if you are willing to spend $200 on an expansion drive surely you could stump up the extra cash for the Series X as opposed to Lockhart?It would still look overpriced but I also don't think Lockhart will be priced that high, either.
Yes
Play at home or take it to a friend's house, peak performance and lightning quick load times are now at your fingertips.
Hopefully.....I know accessories are marked up but a $199 NVMe would look silly next to a $299 or even $249 Lockhart!
I wasn't expecting pricing and preorders today, but this website going live hours before the stream sure is a red flag that we get hardware info today and not just software.