Yup - I'm actually not too concerned about say, this Supreme Court invalidating Biden-passed laws left and right, as I feel Roberts at least goes by a consistent rationale for even his more controversial decisions and doesn't just make shit up to fit his priors (Kavanaugh, Alito and Thomas are far more nakedly partisan in that regard). However, if RBG (or Breyer, who is also very old!) goes before she's able to be replaced by another liberal, I'd be far more worried.Don't forget the goal, RBG needs a liberal replacement. I feel like we're playing roulette with these rulings. Lucky for now but Nov election is so critically important. No one get complacent.
Also means we really need to win in November because they're going to try this again.
There's not enough time before November. That's all you really need to know.
Not AS soon as possible. They need to do this on Jan 21, 2021.Roberts is decent 1 out of every 10 cases.
Still have to ensure Biden gets elected in November to save the court. Alito and Clarence need to fuck off ASAP.
Vote in November so they can't
They won't have the time before November.
Say what you want about Roberts, he's not going to rule for something blatantly unconstitutional.
More that he just has a good eye for the decisions that are going to be historical and doesn't want to be on the wrong side of history for those ones.
And in the middle of a pandemic, if they tried.Makes sense - the president has wide latitude on immigration issues. And the original breaking news cited how arbitrary the removal was. Roberts I'm sure strained to find those issues so he could vote against the administration.
Would be a bold strategy for Trump to attempt to try it again. Ending a popular program like that and throwing millions of people out of the country when they only know the US. All the more reason he needs to be removed in November.
5-4 Roberts + Liberals
Ideally. Kavanaugh being on the court instead of Merrick Garland is a stain as well.Not AS soon as possible. They need to do this on Jan 21, 2021.
And he doesn't want the court on the wrong side either.More that he just has a good eye for the decisions that are going to be historical and doesn't want to be on the wrong side of history for those ones.