?
Can someone please give a quick note summary on the decisions. I thought there were supposed to be 2, but there seem to be 3 regarding this issue? The Breaking Tweets are rather vague.
The cases are Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP (the accounting firm) consolidated with Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG and Trump v. Vance. Mazars and its companion bank cases (henceforth Mazars) involve four subpoenas issued by three House Committees: the House Financial Services Committee, the House Intelligence Committee and the House Oversight Committee. Vance involves a subpoena in aid of a grand jury investigation served on behalf of Cyrus Vance, the District Attorney for the County of New York, on Trump's accounting firm (Mazars) seeking the same documents the House committees requested.
They also differ in that Trump's immediate risk in Mazars is almost entirely political since the information sought could affect voters' views of him. In Vance, however, there is at least some risk that the information sought might support a criminal indictment. However, President Trump is almost certainly immune from trial until after his term in office has ended, and the question of whether a sitting president can be indicted has never been answered. Grand jury secrecy should mean that any documents turned over to Vance will not come back to haunt Trump politically, but as one justice pointed out in oral argument, leaks from grand jury proceedings have happened.
Releasing the records publicly doesn't really matter at this point since they'll only reveal a complex tax situation that will sway no one. What Trump's been worried about is prosecutor's getting a hold of the returns as they will be exhibit A in his trials. Presidential immunity being neutered also is a big blow to TrumpThe AP article I read said this was a victory for Trump since he gets to keep his records private for now. Thread seems a bit premature.
Nothing will, but that's part of the agreement/point. The supreme court does NOT interfere or give the appearance of interfering or any hint of possibly pulling an election in any one direction or the other.I'd be surprised if anything comes of this till after the election.
Well first of all he is not the only one with the power to release those records. He can´t stop people from doing their job.
That's the thing. He was trying to block subpoenas over material he had absolutely no control over. The accounting firm Mazars already said they would comply pending court decisions. It was a two sided attack for the same material and one (for now) was 100% successful, no ambiguity. It's over.What's to stop Trump from not complying? It's not like the laws mean anything to him.
I thought this bit was interesting. Kavanaugh and Gorsuch kinda weaseled their way through this one.
"Here's why good thing bad"Analysts on msnbc saying this is actually quite a good day for Trump politically. Gets it all punted until after the election and it's a blow to Congress's ability to subpoena these sorts of things in the future.
Analysts on msnbc saying this is actually quite a good day for Trump politically. Gets it all punted until after the election and it's a blow to Congress's ability to subpoena these sorts of things in the future.
Dude is acting like they're trying to investigate a possible murder. Not suspicious or anything
This man is so fucking dumb that he doesn't even realize that SCOTUS threw him a huge-ass bone and gave him a do-over
All of it isnt getting punted though. The House case was punted but NY was after the same material. NY is going to get it. Are they setting a timeline for leaks?Analysts on msnbc saying this is actually quite a good day for Trump politically. Gets it all punted until after the election and it's a blow to Congress's ability to subpoena these sorts of things in the future.
Not a do over. New York state prosecutors are on his ass.
He has no legal argument against Congress either, his boys just punted for him to buy him time for this election.
It ain't over, but he got that ass tapped today.