The amount of times I've seen people on Twitter claim Alex has disproven the allegations when, for the record, he's done nothing remotely close to that bar a pathetic excuse for a response video that has since been taken down (clearly because it is such an airtight defence) is really disheartening.
This is what happens every time. The amount of people that say "every Vic accusation was already debunked" is insane.
You should probably clarify what your trying to say here because if your saying what I think your saying you logged in to the wrong site old place is to the door on the right wing of the plane.
And if the THQ Nordic 8Chan AMA is any indication, this'll be swept under the rug in a few months and those who try to bring this issue up here will get ignored or argued with.
At the end of the day, most people don't mind media made or published by "problematic" creators. You can try to bring up these things in topics but most people will ignore you because they like the content and the problematic thing they did doesn't really impact them. Honestly, most people's unsaid reaction to someone trying to bring up any controversial topic related to the creator would be "I don't care".
Sad, but true.
Like with the slave labour involved in console production. None of us come out spotless with our purchases or choices in products and entertainment, but that doesn't mean we can't do more to improve things.
I can't take comments like this seriously and so, at least in the context of this thread, gravitate towards assuming they're meant to be jokes at the expense of the people who make these kinds of comments seriously.
The whole justice system - starting from the police & other involved parties involved in the investigation (if there, indeed, even is any) and ending with the courts - is infamously horrible towards abuse victims. Rarely does anything even go to court, let alone people get convicted.
This is pretty clear going by the recent video. In half a day it already has over 500k views and 43k likes, with 3k comments where there isn't a peep about the controversy.
It's called bad faith, FYI. And yes, I have a hard time taking anybody who's "just asking questions!" like that in any other context than bad faith.
You're missing something. It's a loaded question that's asked in bad faith all the time that's intentionally followed up with "No? Oh, so this isn't a story then".
Well, thanks for being open to an explanation. Honestly. And for what it's worth, your query was a lot more transparent in its honesty.
Thank you for taking the time to explain how it is. Not like those mongrels who came salivating and attacking. The question is like it is asked and it was just to know if the person was convicted because I don't know anything of this story.
Yes as I would love the person to be found guilty if he really did it.
Ehh hellooo, I believe woman, i am a woman and I was hoping someone told me that he did get convicted.
Ok let me explain, i do no believe it's fair to convict someone off the bat when someone sais something, this shit has to go to court. WHY?! because I have seen this shit happen up close a cousin of mine accused her bf or raping her.They went to court for over a year, we all believed her, eventually things were not adding up and she admitted to have invented it all. I will always believe a woman, because not every case is like that obviously an many times women are not believed. You guys all seem I want to discredit the accusation , im not I SIMPLY asked if he was convicted at first. NOT inciting it was a lie or anything. Having went through what I did YES i can give a person wether man or woman the benefit of the doubt. jeez
My condolences about what happened in your family. That is definitely rough.
This is true, but its very well likely that Scott takes a very similar position as the poster you are replying to. Statistically speaking, it is very well likely that RelaxAlax is guilty. But people do lie, its rare. Very very very very rare, but it does happen. There are reasons for people to lie about rape. It happens. Scott was very clearly presented with some kind evidence that RelaxAlax is guilty, but he was also likely talked to by RelaxAlax. Without conclusive evidence, he probably wrote it off.
