Today is a good day so here goes. I've decided I am changing my pronouns to THEY/THEM ❤ after a lifetime of being at war with my gender I've decided to embrace myself for who I am, inside and out...
Today is a good day so here goes. I've decided I am changing my pronouns to THEY/THEM ❤ after a lifetime of being at war with my gender I've decided to embrace myself for who I am, inside and out...
you don't have to, just respect them
I do respect it but i would like to understand more
Me neither, but if he feels better that way we should appreciate and respect it, right?
Yep.
*theyMe neither, but if he feels better that way we should appreciate and respect it, right?
Me neither, but if he feels better that way we should appreciate and respect it, right?
Me neither, but if he feels better that way we should appreciate and respect it, right?
They.
It's times like these that I wish the English language had a gender neutral singular pronoun. It's the same issue as dealing with a generic person such as "every person for himself/herself/themselves." Even disregarding the existence of non-binary people, it's crazy that we never came up with a pronoun for people if we don't know their gender ahead of time.
They/them does not translate well to a singular person. Instead of repurposing a word, which will never sound normal to me in conversation, but does work well in writing.
It's times like these that I wish the English language had a gender neutral singular pronoun. It's the same issue as dealing with a generic person such as "every person for himself/herself/themselves." Even disregarding the existence of non-binary people, it's crazy that we never came up with a pronoun for people if we don't know their gender ahead of time.
We've already tried and some still do identify with neo-pronouns but it seems like most people have settled on they/them for non binary pronouns and as such we should respect that.We need to come up with a different pronoun for non-binary.
They/them does not translate well to a singular person. Instead of repurposing a word, which will never sound normal to me in conversation, but does work well in writing.
The polite thing to do is to take some time to research a subject if you don't understand. Not assume you're owed an explaination.The polite thing to do, would be to explain it to them so people understand. It helps people get a grasp of what it all actually means and helps encourage support for this.
I agree with that and would of course use they/them as requested. Still, it just feels like a grammatical failure to not account for such a thing.It'd be helpful, but in the scheme of things one doesn't have to be technically grammatically correct to just use someone's preferred pronoun so it shouldn't really matter.
Yeah that's why I wouldn't suggest "it". "It" should be used for non-human (and ideally non-sentient) life.Technically, "it" is a gender neutral pronoun. Unfortunately, there's a negative connotation with "it" and it sounds dehumanising. I do wonder why we can't just invest a new word? It's not like the English language has stopped it's development.
how can you say you respect someone's pronouns while simultaneously misgendering them?I feel like we need a different term for non-binary. They then is a plural, while she or he is singular. I respect his wishes and will call him they or them all the same.
People tried. Xe and ze, to be specific, but they/them caught on instead.Technically, "it" is a gender neutral pronoun. Unfortunately, there's a negative connotation with "it" and it sounds dehumanising. I do wonder why we can't just invest a new word? It's not like the English language has stopped it's development.
Regarding, Sam, I'm glad we live in a day and age where they feel comfortable sharing their preferred pronouns. Sam's revelation will also bring some mainstream attention to gender identity and will hopefully help some other folks publicly embrace their preferred gender identity.
how can you say you respect someone's pronouns while simultaneously misgendering them?
Is there a reason why?"It" should be used for non-human (and ideally non-sentient) life.
We need to come up with a different pronoun for non-binary.
They/them does not translate well to a singular person. Instead of repurposing a word, which will never sound normal to me in conversation, but does work well in writing.
Yeah that's why I wouldn't suggest "it". "It" should be used for non-human (and ideally non-sentient) life.
Former Chief Editor of the OED Robert Burchfield, in The New Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage (1996), dismisses objections to singular they as unsupported by the historical record. Burchfield observes that the construction is 'passing unnoticed' by speakers of standard English as well as by copy editors, and he concludes that this trend is 'irreversible'. People who want to be inclusive, or respectful of other people's preferences, use singular they. And people who don't want to be inclusive, or who don't respect other people's pronoun choices, use singular they as well. Even people who object to singular they as a grammatical error use it themselves when they're not looking, a sure sign that anyone who objects to singular they is, if not a fool or an idiot, at least hopelessly out of date.
So it's proper to use them/they to address the person then? I've never encountered a non-binart individual irl so I'm glad I got a TIL on that
I'm certain youve used "they" in the singular form countless times in your life. It works in the singular, you just arent used to using it consciously.We need to come up with a different pronoun for non-binary.
They/them does not translate well to a singular person. Instead of repurposing a word, which will never sound normal to me in conversation, but does work well in writing.