Nuke the filibuster as wellCan only do that with a 2/3rds majority in the Senate. Requires changing the law.
The only option is to stack the courts. That's the only option.
Hubris.Saw a tweet of this appear in Discord and spent five minutes shouting at the person who posted it to tell me they were bullshitting.
She could've retired back in '09-'10. Why didn't she?
Have you seen what happened because of the USPS fuckery? Massive early voting turnout. Fucking with the mail is not the easy slam dunk auto-win for Trump people seem to be portraying it as.
Yup.If there are going to be court cases related to the election ala Bush 2000, which there very well may be, they need their yes man in the seat ASAP.
I am cautiously optimistic republicans won't force a nasty fight in the senate just weeks before the election after what they did with Obama's suggested Scalia replacement.
I mean they could and will probably try but it does not seem like a politically advantageous move this close to the election.
Of course if Republicans lose, Trump can force a SCJ down our throat anyway just before biden takes over via obscure laws(remember reading about this thing where POTUS can basically unilaterally force a judge on the supreme court while congress is not in session, or may be I am misremembering ?)
Maybe people should have voted in 2016 when they were told exactly this situation could have happened...You know what would have been better than an 87 year old cancer survivor being a "warrior" to stymie an absolute shitshow? Retiring when we had a democratic president and senate.
Yep. People needed to up and vote in 2016.Yep. We warned back then this was a distinct possibility. People just didn't listen
If there's a will there's a way. With a democrat controlled senate and president.SCOTUS is gone
nothing we can do about that now. just keep fighting.
Why bother? He'll hammer someone through as soon as possible. Lifetime appointments don't mean shit for electionsMy guess is that McConnell is gonna slow the nomination process to drive up turnout for November, and then push the nominee through the lame duck.
Are you Rich?White?Conservative?
If Dems get the Senate, they can remove the filibuster rule for regular votes, then change the law, them stack the courts. Will they though?Can only do that with a 2/3rds majority in the Senate. Requires changing the law.
.You know what would have been better than an 87 year old cancer survivor being a "warrior" to stymie an absolute shitshow? Retiring when we had a democratic president and senate.
They would push it through in 24 hours if needed, we will have a new judge before October.
The pit in my stomach is about the same as I had after the results came in on election night 2016. Worse, even.
That is not true:Can only do that with a 2/3rds majority in the Senate. Requires changing the law.
The answer is that under the Constitution, the number of Supreme Court Justices is not fixed, and Congress can change it by passing an act that is then signed by the President. Article III, Section 1, starts with a broad direction to Congress to establish the court system: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."
Packing the Supreme Court explained - National Constitution Center
Senator Marco Rubio plans to propose a new constitutional amendment to permanently limit the Supreme Court to nine Justices. While Rubio faces a difficult task, the effort does raise some questions.constitutioncenter.org