The poster wrote "beacon of meritocracy".Do you seriously stand by your claim that Ukraine makes Russia look like a beacon of democracy? After all this?
The poster wrote "beacon of meritocracy".Do you seriously stand by your claim that Ukraine makes Russia look like a beacon of democracy? After all this?
.
I don't think the world wants to deal with Putin anymore. Ultimately up to Ukraine but I feel the world is done with Putin and this is about the only chance to force him out one way or another.
The Soviets continued to develop AT guns into the 80s. They are equipped with radar and are capable of firing AT missiles as well.These things sill exist O.o? I thought towed AT cannons died out in the 50s and 60s...
There's a pretty easy case to be made that while I doubt Putin expected to meet this type of resistance, the net result could end up still being a win for Putin domestically depending on how this ends up going because this war, of his making, is allowing him to justify even more draconian noose tightening on the levers of power and influence within Russia and taking out any oppositional forces, either in the oligarchy, the intelligence sphere, and the populace.
You literally said Ukraine is more corrupt then Russia, and absolutely insane statement that everything from this war has shown to just not be true. A Ukraine more corrupt then Russia is not one that is able to field an army as competent as they are. Which we know because the deeply corrupt Russian military is bumblefucking there way into the dirt.
That's not even getting into acting like Azov is some majority of the army. There also not police.
I don't think your a bot. Your statement just included stuff that's downright nonsensical
And what the hell are you talking about with the "you know trying to defend the state of Ukranian corruption and democracy is a dead-end?" I have no interest in arguing such things.
Sounds a lot like the US tbqh. I don't know what you're trying to accomplish aside from side step the issue that Russia is belligerently attacking Ukraine.
So... just like the US, UK, France, Spain, Italy, Japan, Australia, Brazil, China, India... and most of the rest of the planet?
Please point me to the country where "far-right attacks against minorities" have not "been tolerated / supported by law enforcement" in the last few decades?
Actually, don't.
Russia didn't invade Ukraine due to some bullshit "denazification" excuse, and even arguing about it gives more credence to the Kremlin's propaganda than it deserves.
Can I suggest if you are concerned about being accused to posting pro-Russian propoganda then maybe *stop posting fucking Russian propoganda?*?
Like on what planet do you think coming into the thread where Ukrainian civilians are being shown being murdered by a hostile invading army and going 'well, actually ukraines quite bad' is a good move? Either you're a Russian propoganda pusher or a useful idiot who hasn't a shred of decent or common sense.
It's frankly fucking disgusting people still think this is acceptable or okay.
they can't even invade a country that they border and have sea access to, how the fuck do they think they will invade a country surrounded by Nato.Map of minefields in Bosnia
The Yugoslav wars were.. an interesting time
Sounds a lot like the US tbqh. I don't know what you're trying to accomplish aside from side step the issue that Russia is belligerently attacking Ukraine.At the risk of being accused of posting pro-Russian propaganda, you can read this article by Freedom House from 2018 which shows how far-right attacks in the country against minorities have been tolerated if not supported by law enforcement: https://freedomhouse.org/report/analytical-brief/2018/far-right-extremism-threat-ukrainian-democracy
Really big catapults.they can't even invade a country that they border and have sea access to, how the fuck do they think they will invade a country surrounded by Nato.
They will hold exercises in Serbia.they can't even invade a country that they border and have sea access to, how the fuck do they think they will invade a country surrounded by Nato.
The thought has crossed my mind the last day (and I wrote as much here). Putin has used unconscionable crises in the past to consolidate power in the past. Even when they have left him weaker in some ways, it was worthwhile in the long run. I do not think it is worthwhile in the long run any longer, but it may have been a big calculation for doing this at all in the first place. Or at least probably not within Putin's lifetime.Maybe all of this was an excuse for Putin to get more control over Russia and go after whatever opposition remained?
they can't even invade a country that they border and have sea access to, how the fuck do they think they will invade a country surrounded by Nato.
We should sanction the hell out of that small little island…and Yellowstone. Just to be sure.
But if Bosnia joins NATO, won't ALL OF NATO then pounce on Russia if they try this shit?
Can we please not do this?
Needlessly trying to worry that America is going to be a dictatorship anytime soon is no more helpful than the pointless World War III or nuclear weapons talk.
Bosnia has a tripartite presidential system that requires consensus to vote on policy.But if Bosnia joins NATO, won't ALL OF NATO then pounce on Russia if they try this shit?
Probably "humanitarian" flight as they are still allowed and Russia tries to make all their flights humanitarian. They also supply nuclear fuel to Slovakia
Indeed. It's not just the calm, measured response from the WH. It's also the world united, after 45 spent years undermining NATO, undermining US relations with Europe, sucking up to authoritarians including Putin, and blackmailing Ukraine. We'd be facing another Helsinki moment if 45 was still here. "I spoke to Putin, he says it's just a special operation and they'll be gone soon, and I believe him."Cannot be stressed how lucky we are that this is happening while we have rational, sane, executive branch leadership in the US. This would have been a complete shit show with 45 or another disingenuous Republican in office. All the Kremlin propaganda would be constantly getting signal boosted by American leadership on the national stage.
The planned timetable captured from Marines indicated that everything was to have been wrapped up by Day 15.I remember reading about how Russia's plan was to end the war on the 28th day and that they had no plan/logistics beyond that deadline
This would fit perfectly with what was said then
The planned timetable captured from Marines indicated that everything was to have been wrapped up by Day 15.
Havent seen the 28 Day one personally.
Can we please not do this?
Needlessly trying to worry that America is going to be a dictatorship anytime soon is no more helpful than the pointless World War III or nuclear weapons talk.
Yep, it's basically been his go-to since coming to power. The guy literally created a false flag early in his first term to do just thatThe thought has crossed my mind the last day (and I wrote as much here). Putin has used unconscionable crises in the past to consolidate power in the past. Even when they have left him weaker in some ways, it was worthwhile in the long run. I do not think it is worthwhile in the long run any longer, but it may have been a big calculation for doing this at all in the first place. Or at least probably not within Putin's lifetime.
But... the moves toward further totalitarianism that he has enacted with this conflict as the background will not be reversed so quickly, even if Russia fully withdraws - even out of Crimea. Unless these protests really do grow, how likely is it that the Duma reverses this ban on fake news? Or relaxes protest laws? Or allows independent media and real political opposition? Or decentralizes security and money and power accumulation in Moscow away from the territories?
Pretty dang unlikely, I think.... No matter what happens in Ukraine.
They will broadcast this on their western facing platforms to make themselves seem neutral or even compassionate to the Ukraine cause, but what really matters is if they broadcast this on their domestic platforms.
So you're not going to address the statements you said, make a vague "I figured" and then quote me, but tell me not to quote you?
Yep, China does not want their people to empathize with the Ukrainian people and learn lessons from them about civil unrest. China does not want a EuroMaidan happening anywhere in their borders.Not even what they broadcast, but what they allow to appear on their heavily censored domestic platforms. They allowed a lot of pro-Russia trash on their social media previously.
Aren't we in this long haul because the Russian army is such a den of corruption that their army is basically a shell unable to quickly end this conflict?