So you want the same game, but worse?
Well, I guess some are easily satisfied.
Nothing's worse than a non-existent game.
So you want the same game, but worse?
Well, I guess some are easily satisfied.
Are you for real?So you want the same game, but worse?
Well, I guess some are easily satisfied.
I love when Japanese teams work together like this, magic happens a lot through these types of collaborationsNo kidding. First Bayonetta 2, now possibly Scalebound. Can you imagine?
Platinum found its sugar daddy.
Voted Silent Hills because every option is stupid anyway and that's the one I'd like to become real.
i dont understand why this game doesn't exist yet
Trademark is an intellectual property right. There are different kinds of IPR, but in the case of a game's name, Trademark and Copyright are the only two that really apply. A trademark needs to be registered and renewed generally every ten years. However, when a company doesn't use it for three consecutive years (in US, the length varies depending on the country but it's generally three to five years), it's considered as abandoned, which doesn't necessarily means the original holder has no right on it but it becomes much more feasible for another company to get their hands on it.
Copyright is different as in it doesn't protect just a name like Trademark does but rather a work (like a photography) and you don't even need to register it to have copyrights rights on your work. It lasts for like 70 years but law varies a lot depending on the country.
In this case, considering PlatinumGames was the original developer in any case, I don't think Copyright would be such a big hurdle. But it depends a lot on details we simply don't have. As for Trademark, it seems to be abandoned in both USPTO and EUIPO but Microsoft can still have common law rights despite the situation.
I misunderstood your post as one of the ones claiming that now that the trademark was abandoned by Microsoft, Nintendo could just swoop in and use the IP.
After watching the direct I thought this rumor was about Rune Factory 5. Since the rumor was pre-direct and the studio that made Rune Factory was canned.
Does AC look like a Scalebound copy in a different skin? If Kamiya really wanted to make it but MS pulled it because it looked trash, maybe he found another partner in MS who will throw cash his way.So, just as a sanity check here, is it possible that the revived game being Scalebound and Scalebound becoming Astral Chain are both true?
So, just as a sanity check here, is it possible that the revived game being Scalebound and Scalebound becoming Astral Chain are both true?
Those were at least decently spaced out. They weren't working on Star Fox while doing TW101 (I don't think anyway).
I suppose if they only started working on another game after releasing Astral Chain, that'd be one thing. But how many games can they work on at once? Don't forget, SE still has them signed on for Babylon's Fall.
But the main thing is: Why get the Scalebound IP when they could just make a brand new IP about a dude with a dragon?
So, just as a sanity check here, is it possible that the revived game being Scalebound and Scalebound becoming Astral Chain are both true?
Because two words.
I believe DMC will appear on Switch eventually in the form of ports , im not sure about Scalebound it seems unlikelyScalebound on switch has enough chance of DMC appearing on switch.
So you're saying that this game got leaked within days to weeks of its pitch/preproduction? Sounds horribly unlikely. Also if that were even the case, then that would mean we won't see this game release for a good 3 years or soAstral Chain is releasing pretty soon. Scalebound could be in pre-prod. Case reopened.
A bad game can potentially have fans.Arguably, a bad game is worse.
Cygames is finishing it on its own.
Well, maybe it is then. Seems odd that he could not manage with MS, yet seems to push out another Nintendo title.I don't see why not. Take Scalebound, change the Dragon to the Legion, reskin it with Sci-fi and manga art, and you pretty much have what we know of Astral Chain.
Of course, the rumor would still be false, because Astral Chain isn't Scalebound, but it's plausible that Scalebound's ideas and basic gameplay loop have been repurposed into Astral Chain.
It does.
A Good Post.™Trademark is an intellectual property right. There are different kinds of IPR, but in the case of a game's name, Trademark and Copyright are the only two that really apply. A trademark needs to be registered and renewed generally every ten years. However, when a company doesn't use it for three consecutive years (in US, the length varies depending on the country but it's generally three to five years), it's considered as abandoned, which doesn't necessarily means the original holder has no right on it but it becomes much more feasible for another company to get their hands on it.
Copyright is different as in it doesn't protect just a name like Trademark does but rather a work (like a photography) and you don't even need to register it to have copyrights rights on your work. It lasts for like 70 years but law varies a lot depending on the country.
In this case, considering PlatinumGames was the original developer in any case, I don't think Copyright would be such a big hurdle. But it depends a lot on details we simply don't have. As for Trademark, it seems to be abandoned in both USPTO and EUIPO but Microsoft can still have common law rights despite the situation.
Me neither man, wasn't it a success?
True... People seem to like Knack...
We have one already. This is going to be gud.Arguably, a bad game is worse.
Cygames is finishing it on its own.
Sorry and thanks for clarification!You are conflating what I said with what Leakypanda said. I said to keep an eye on Platinum in 2019. That's all I said. The number three was never mentioned by me.
The switch rumor archive thread exists so people can keep track of who said what.
No.So uh, I saw someone say the Scalebound rumour was picking up steam in this thread. Any new rumblings beyond the Nintendo Insider article?
Can Imran at least shut down the scale bound rumors? seems like if untrue it be a quick tweet to send out. fascinating none the less.
Wasn't this how Bayonetta 2 happens pretty much?
No one else wanted to fund it at the time so Nintendo picked it up?