I definitely get the impression from the OP that it would not work on an iPhone for example
It won't. It's google devices only (and any PC that works with Chrome).
I definitely get the impression from the OP that it would not work on an iPhone for example
It will run in a browser eventually. I was in the beta, it worked incredibly.Assuming you already have the appropriate hardware, yeah.
Do people still play Apex Legends?
The streaming is what allowed me to list what I listed
And at least one of those things was a negative lol
Well they might add support if the service is a hit, but definitely not at launch.
$170 streaming box + $12 Pro subscription and having to pay for recent games on top of that?
Who is this aimed at?
Canadians. The US prices in US dollars will be revealed in two hours.$170 streaming box + $12 Pro subscription and having to pay for recent games on top of that?
Who is this aimed at?
Yes that is but this is a streaming service at $11.99. you want NEW games day 1 at $11.99? Let's be realistic.With the exception that with PSN and XBL, you're getting to download them locally. That's a major difference whether you like to admit it or not.
For streaming? Absolutely.Yes that is but this is a streaming service at $11.99. you want NEW games day 1 at $11.99? Let's be realistic.
If I got this right...
$277 for the first year and that doesn't include new games.
$420 for year two if they don't increase the sub cost.
At some point you are paying more to sub than to own.
4k60fps I guessseparate sub will be available in 2020, and is completely free. It'll only allow up to 1080p streaming, and won't include any game like the Pro sub.
I don't get this part. So you can only play games you buy like normal so what's the point of the sub?
You magically get "free" YouTube, Gmail, Google search, Google Maps etc. I wasn't asking for free new AAA games, I was asking for free old games (imagine, like a free PS Now but without PS exclusives limited to 1080p and a paid version to upgrade to 4K/60fps, and the new AAA games would be purchased separatedly but way under $60).lol, you aren't going to magically get free AAA titles from google within the free sub
overdelivering on value, aren't they?so you have to buy new games at full price to stream them at a shitty bitrate? lol
Im just saying that this is the option that is available to us for the next year or more. Any games you buy will also need you to pay the $11.99 subscription if you want to play them in 4K/60fps otherwise you are limited to 1080p/30fps.Stadia will get better, unless I'm not understanding you correctly.
That is the trade off and i do understand the reasoning behind it but from a customer perspective, if i buy a game i expect to be able to take advantage of that to its fullest. If the game was designed to go 4K/60fps then i expect to have that if i have paid full price and own it.You're capable of playing that game as a higher quality because you own the hardware capable of doing so. In the Stadia scenario, you don't. That fee you pay is to rent their hardware.
Why would anyone who cares about next gen hardware stream in the first place? The games will still look and run awful compared to games running natively on your console at home.Stadia is next gen hardware. Lemme know if PS5 costs 200 at launch.
Sounds really good to me.
People who pay 400$ for console + $9.99/month for Gold subscription and paying for recent games on top of that.
I think this is it in a nutshell.Paying $170 to get access to the launch of, essentially, a next-generation console. It seems like they're targeting tech adopters at the early stages - maybe the kind of person who owns a VR headset, and owns a PS4 and/or an Xbox One already.
Then they'll scale from there, adding devices, appealing to more people.
I imagine part of why Google is experimenting with Stadia to begin with is because the cloud tech that they're working on for it can be used in other use cases like enterprise. If Stadia fails, they'll take the cloud tech they developed for it and use it for something else.I really don't buy the idea that Google has a trigger finger to kill the service theyve spent massive resources to build.
I also don't buy the narrative that Google is a graveyard of abandoned projects. If anything they launch too many projects that overlap with each other. Then eventually they have to reconfigure/streamline their offerings. Like we know Hangouts is gonna be killed, but there's already like 3 other messaging services to take it's place. What difference does it make if they rebrand Hangouts or replace it with something new that offers the same features?
Yes that is but this is a streaming service at $11.99. you want NEW games day 1 at $11.99? Let's be realistic.
Lmfaoo ok so if Netflix and Amazon don't do this why should Google? Games are $60. Movies are $10-$18 and and they aren't even included day 1 in streaming services. You have to wait for them to be available. Same scenario here. You wanting NEW games to be available day 1 at $11.99 isn't realistic at all.
I can't see this taking off unless Sony and MS really drag their feet at getting their services on everything. The only thing Stadia has going for it right now is higher quality streaming then PS Now, but Sony is making efforts to improve that and I'm sure Xcloud will be fairly competitive at launch.
New games have to be bought seperately. I assume that you need to buy them which normally is at full price.
How do Microsoft do it?Lmfaoo ok so if Netflix and Amazon don't do this why should Google? Games are $60. Movies are $10-$18 and and they aren't even included day 1 in streaming services. You have to wait for them to be available. Same scenario here. You wanting NEW games to be available day 1 at $11.99 isn't realistic at all.
Wrong, It's aimed at people who aren't currently gaming because having to buy a console is such a barrier to entry. They said so at GDC
Yeah, people are not seeing this and just want NEW games day 1 at $11.99 it seems.
That is the trade off and i do understand the reasoning behind it but from a customer perspective, if i buy a game i expect to be able to take advantage of that to its fullest. If the game was designed to go 4K/60fps then i expect to have that if i have paid full price and own it.
The idea of spending £50 on a game with Google and then have to subscribe and make sure i have an online connection just to be able to get the most out of my purchase is ridiculous.
Of course i understand the reasoning for this is that you dont have to purchase a console up front but over the space of a console generation you will spend more on Stradia and own inferior versions of games.
Im also willing to bet that Stradia will have less competitive digital sales then either Sony or Microsoft so you will probably spend more on the games overall too.