It was tongue in cheek, yes. "Let the past die" is as redundant as "Only a Sith deals in absolutes" ;)
No Finn huh? I guess they finally stopped pretending they give a shit about him.
Didn't watch Jedi Then?Based on the bait and switch in the first movie and the absolute trash from the second, I doubt it. They got they wanted him for and now they're done.
Something that I see rarely addressed. How the fuck did Kylo get back his helmet after Starkilier base blew up? He clearly leaves it on the bridge after he kills Han.
TFA is my favorite Star Wars film, so it definitely has me pretty excited.I'm cool with it being more like TFA, the mask is a good start
God. That asshole would have probably written some dude to mansplain to Rey or some dumb shit like that.
People keep using that line like it was the moral of the film and Ren's beliefs, when in the context of the film, it was just his own warped logic attempting to justify killing Han, killing the other Jedi, giving into the Dark Side, etc and attempting to bring Rey to his sideExcept that...the point of the story was that he couldn't actually do that. Rey and Luke let the past go but he couldn't. Makes sense that he would go back to the Vader cosplay after being bitchslapped once again.
Ren: He'd sensed my power, as he senses yours, and he feared it.
Rey: Liar.
Ren: Let the past die. Kill it if you have to. That's the only way to become what you were meant to be.
It was tongue in cheek, yes. "Let the past die" is as redundant as "Only a Sith deals in absolutes" ;)
Maybe he turned around and pulled it towards him as he walks out. Who cares?
Yup. JJ gonna JJ. Knew what to expect when he came back on board.lol bringing back the helmet completely ruins his entire development in TLJ
knew Abrams was gonna fall back on what was easiest. power to him, though. hope the movieis good in its own right
It's a glaring error. First, JJ gets rid of the helmet at the end of TFA, then RJ nonsensically brings it back only to destroy it for JJ then to bring it back again in IX. The damn helmet basically represents the directionlessness of the sequel trilogy.
I think it makes far more sense for him to create a new identity or appearance. His crushing of the mask was a turning point for his character -- he's no longer owned/controlled by Snoke.I'm fine with the mask coming back.
TLJ was his chance at redemption of returning to humanity, he ejected it, now he's truly the guy who murdered his Dad in cold blood
You're complaining about nothing. You can easily invent an explanation for such a minor detail. Maybe he went back and grabbed it. Maybe he ordered some stormtrooper to go pick it up. It doesn't matter.
I think it makes far more sense for him to create a new identity or appearance. His crushing of the mask was a turning point for his character -- he's no longer owned/controlled by Snoke.
I think it makes far more sense for him to create a new identity or appearance. His crushing of the mask was a turning point for his character -- he's no longer owned/controlled by Snoke.
He destroyed the mask because of Snoke's criticism of him. Now he's killed Snoke and is the supreme leader, he can do whatever he likes. Rey tried to make him change, and was so close, but ultimately, he didn't. This just cements that.
It's a glaring error. First, JJ gets rid of the helmet at the end of TFA, then RJ nonsensically brings it back only to destroy it for JJ then to bring it back again in IX. The damn helmet basically represents the directionlessness of the sequel trilogy.
I get why he had it originally - he wanted to be like Darth Vader, so he was basically a child dressing up in an edgy way to look intimidating. Why would the Supreme Leader of the First Order need to hide his face any more, especially if his whole ideology is about letting the past die?
It's obviously not a disguise either because who'd be stupid enough to use the same mask if they intended to go unnoticed?
I always just assumed he went back for it and before his confrontation with Rey and Finn and just see dropped it before approaching them. Not too big of a dealAn unanswered question about a small detail in a Star Wars movie??
I expect the helmet retrieval to be shown in great detail in Rogue Two: A Star Wars Story in 2022.
I get why he had it originally - he wanted to be like Darth Vader, so he was basically a child dressing up in an edgy way to look intimidating. Why would the Supreme Leader of the First Order need to hide his face any more, especially if his whole ideology is about letting the past die?
It's obviously not a disguise either because who'd be stupid enough to use the same mask if they intended to go unnoticed?
Its amazing people dont pick up on this.He destroyed the mask because of Snoke's criticism of him. Now he's killed Snoke and is the supreme leader, he can do whatever he likes. Rey tried to make him change, and was so close, but ultimately, he didn't. This just cements that.
Since it's JJ, we can assume they'll be identical to Luke and Vader's.
Because quite literally he's now a child with supreme power, so fuck you he can wear what he wants.
They're going to have to do better than that if they really want him to stand beside the likes of Vader and Palpatine as iconic villains. So far everything he does, everything he stands for, is the incessant whining of a child who doesn't think his parents loved him enough.
That is not how you write a good villain. That's how you write a pathetic one.
The mask is something born out of the control and manipulation of Snoke; it represents the grip he had on Kylo. By destroying it, he freed himself of that ownership. Take a look at the way the scene is filmed and you can realize the obvious symbolic meaning of the mask itself (that he's just pretending to be something he's not will always keep him inside the shadow of Snoke). Piecing it back together, to me, just makes no sense from a thematic standpoint.He destroyed the mask because of Snoke's criticism of him. Now he's killed Snoke and is the supreme leader, he can do whatever he likes. Rey tried to make him change, and was so close, but ultimately, he didn't. This just cements that.
Why is everyone saying he's fixing the mask as if it's impossible for him to just make another mask.
He is a pathetic one
The whole idea is that the First Order are the Alt-Right to the Empire's Nazis
That's actually why I love it so much, these villains are pathetic.
They aren't cool. I mean the mask looks cool but the person wearing it isn't
Same place Luke's lightsabre ends up between Empire and TFA, some sort of hole where important plot points goSo he... went back to the elevator after the movie ended, despite the ship being blown up, and the pieces were still there?
Like, when did he go get the pieces to the helmet? Why?
The mask is something born out of the control and manipulation of Snoke; it represents the grip he had on Kylo. By destroying it, he freed himself of that ownership. Take a look at the way the scene is filmed and you can realize the obvious symbolic meaning of the mask itself. Piecing it back together, to me, just makes no sense from a thematic standpoint.
A new identity altogether makes far more sense, or an alteration of what we see after Snoke's murder. IMO.
I edited my post if you want to take a look.Nah. Snoke definitely called the mask pathetic or something to that effect and demanded Ben remove it. It was what Ben wore to emulate Anakin, I assume out of a belief that it made him look intimidating.
So I can see why people are saying Ben wearing it again is an act of defiance against Snoke, but that's an extremely immature and childish action to take. The guy is dead. He doesn't give a crap what Ben wears any more and, as you say, it makes more sense that Ben would give himself a new wardrobe to reflect his newfound power as leader of the First Order.
Kinda funny how Ben had the potential to be really cool and unique and he's actually just a Vader fanboy that turned evil because it would hurt the parents he doesn't think loved him enough.
So I can see why people are saying Ben wearing it again is an act of defiance against Snoke, but that's an extremely immature and childish action to take. The guy is dead. He doesn't give a crap what Ben wears any more and, as you say, it makes more sense that Ben would give himself a new wardrobe to reflect his newfound power as leader of the First Order.
Kinda funny how Ben had the potential to be really cool and unique and he's actually just a Vader fanboy that turned evil because it would hurt the parents he doesn't think loved him enough.
That rhymes so well with JJ->Rian->JJHe was embarrassed by Luke and rejected by Rey when he tried to become his own man and now he's falling back into what makes him feel powerful.
Nah. Snoke definitely called the mask pathetic or something to that effect and demanded Ben remove it. It was what Ben wore to emulate Anakin, I assume out of a belief that it made him look intimidating.
So I can see why people are saying Ben wearing it again is an act of defiance against Snoke, but that's an extremely immature and childish action to take. The guy is dead. He doesn't give a crap what Ben wears any more and, as you say, it makes more sense that Ben would give himself a new wardrobe to reflect his newfound power as leader of the First Order.
Kinda funny how Ben had the potential to be really cool and unique and he's actually just a Vader fanboy that turned evil because it would hurt the parents he doesn't think loved him enough.
I think Finn is gonna get a big comeback in IX. This is only one leaked image.
I think it makes far more sense for him to create a new identity or appearance. His crushing of the mask was a turning point for his character -- he's no longer owned/controlled by Snoke.