It's almost like boycotts started to make a grand statement over controversies that don't matter in the grand scheme of things don't work because it's easy to say something without actually doing it and that pattern is so easily replicable that it's become a meme. And you know, Call of Duty sells no matter what.It's not even close to offence. Just calling out bullshit when I see it because yknow people post that image expecting some grand slam on anyone's choice to boycott anything.
Based on his Marvel Twitter account, a professional bullshitter.
Everyone who posts this image should be banned for trolling.
When you look at the players in a Steam group page, the players are ordered by those playing a game FIRST, then the ones who aren't. If the group has 30000 members and 100 of them are playing the game, then the first page of the list will be 100% filled up with people playing the game, yet only 100 out of 30000 players in the group are playing the game. This is repeated again and again this shitty image is posted, so at this point I can say with 100% confidence that if you're posting it, you're trolling on purpose. So, please, fuck off.
No, because they would have just said he was wrong.This just sounds to me like he got his info wrong and is now finding an escape route.
But people are ordered by whether they're currently playing A game, not THE game. That puts all games on a level playing field first and foremost.
And if from these people, a significant number of the currently most active ones from page one are playing MW2, then that is surely indicative of a good amount of "traitors" in that group percentage-wise.
So yes, you could argue that page one is a small percentage of the overall members in that group, and most will be offline. But that one page already speaks volumes about what many of the others will probably play once they also come back online. It's not that big of a group tbf, but I think that makes it all the more sad lol
I don't really think it's as misleading as some make it out be here?
The image is mainly dumb because CoD is actually a ghost town on PC. So say what you like, PC players did eventually tire of Activision's bullshit and abandoned the series, while it's still incredibly popular on consoles.
No, they claimed he exaggerated. Not that he was wrong. I suspect they do what other people who use pay to win mechanics do and say that they don't really effect gameplay that much if you don't use them.
I don't think it's misleading either, but some people continue to be bothered by it. At the end of the day, it's funny. And if we're going for accuracy, the image is probably as accurate as this rumor.But people are ordered by whether they're currently playing A game, not THE game. That puts all games on a level playing field first and foremost.
And if from these people, a significant number of the currently most active ones from page one are playing MW2, then that is surely indicative of a good amount of "traitors" in that group percentage-wise.
So yes, you could argue that page one is a small percentage of the overall members in that group, and most will be offline. But that one page already speaks volumes about what many of the others will probably play once they also come back online. It's not that big of a group tbf, but I think that makes it all the more sad lol
I don't really think it's as misleading as some make it out be here?
me too, didn't realise i'd cause so much by posting itIt took me this far into the thread to finally understand both the image and the people mad at it lol
Because it is dumb, and the people posting it to make a point isn't actually making the point they think it is.
That's my bet ;) This game will be huge!
Why do people need additional incentive to go where the numbers are? That makes no sense. People aren't going to buy a PS4 for the first time right now, at the end of this generation, to play COD. Statistically, most people already have PS4s and so do their friends.It encourages people to go where the numbers are, which is majority the reason you play a multiplayer game in the first place.
Do I personally encourage the treatment of players as numbers and cattle, no, but I'm not going to sit here and act like I haven't seen the writing on the wall for some time and maneuvered accordingly.
Fortnite is f2p and manages to have cosmetic only microtransactions just fine.Pay to win weapon microtransactions is the last straw fuck that this isn't a F2P game
Why one year? This is so dumb. 30 days is "fine", 90 days top. It is an actual mode, not just a map. Don't make a mode timed exclusive.
Would it better if it was MS 🤔? Activision just want those marketing deals. So they appeal to the market leader... in this case Sony. It is not any different than what they did with MS last gen. 😑Good. COD needs to stop selling out to Sony every year. It's ridiculous.
Sony gets to run the commercials because Activision have a marketing deal with them. 😑Why do they have to do anything to begin with? Sony gets to run commercials and package it with consoles. That sells millions of consoles.
That's what you always should do. Vote with your wallet.Cool, of course it will be, it's CoD and the same audience lap that shit up every year. They still won't be getting my money this year and to me, that's all that matters.
Maybe more people will start to think the same and it will finally come to an end. That or Activision will punish the developers and put them on map duties.
Ya'll are really bugging out about that steam group image. It's just a funny picture, chill out.
Why does a player base need to be "rewarded" over another player base?Do you want them to just not reward their largest player-base?
EDIT: This isn't a co-sign of the limiting of a game mode.
Just a correction, IW isn't happy about this either. This is all Activision.This guy has had some pretty solid insider information so far on MW, but I'm leery about this one. The 1 year deal on an entire mode is bullshit, essentially removing it from the game for anyone not on Playstation. Anyone who knows anyone about CoD knows a year is the next CoD, and the player base of the old CoD basically dies off. (not that you can't still play them and get matches, it's just most people move on).
I get that might make a lot of people cancel their pre orders but enough so to make IW rethink the deal?
I think the odds of it being changed depend on whose idea it was in the first place. Did Sony ask for an entire mode of exclusivity in the original deal? Or did Sony just ask for something exclusive and IW offered up Survival mode thinking no one would give a fuck?
We don't really know for sure.
I hate everytime this is posted, this was set up by Cod Stans to troll those actually boycotting.