Asking for sanctions against the states counsel is amazing on brand for this sort of nonsense.
To anyone who takes his word that he was tucking in his shirt or whatever ..
who the fuck does that laying down on their back with your hand visibly inside your crotch area when you have another person in the room (who isn't your spouse or SO).
-_-
Why couldn't it be appealed? Needs to be re-amended or something first?
Rudy verbally argued stuff that isn't in the original written complaint so the judge wants it summarized on paper so he can throw it out with less wiggle room for appeal.So what's going on with this? He's giving them an opportunity to rewrite their complaint for today, and then what? It's all going to be a pile of garbage. Why is the judge dragging it out?
Judge didn't make a ruling on the motion to dismiss, he gave Trumps team leave and direction to amend their complaint with the things Guliani raised in the court room things that weren't in the actual filings. The judge wants it all on paper so he can rule on it all at once.Why couldn't it be appealed? Needs to be re-amended or something first?
Here is what is happening:
1) The Plaintiff's have the right to ASK to amend their Complaint at this stage but the Court need not grant the motion to file a second amended complaint - ie could deem the Second Amended Complaint as futile;
2) The Court gave the Plaintiff's the right to file a reply to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The Court is giving the Plaintiff's these options to make sure there is no procedural reason for an appeal;
3) The Court canceled the evidentiary hearing tomorrow.
Here is what I think will happen:
1) The Court will dismiss the case on lack of standing - and analyze the substantive legal arguments, stating that even if they had standing, there is no case
2) The Court will deny the Motion to Amend the Complaint on the grounds of futility
3) Rudy et al will appeal to the 3rd Circuit and will get denied without hearing
4) Rudy et al will appeal to SC and will get denied without hearing
Nice summary, thank youHere is what is happening:
1) The Plaintiff's have the right to ASK to amend their Complaint at this stage but the Court need not grant the motion to file a second amended complaint - ie could deem the Second Amended Complaint as futile;
2) The Court gave the Plaintiff's the right to file a reply to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The Court is giving the Plaintiff's these options to make sure there is no procedural reason for an appeal;
3) The Court canceled the evidentiary hearing tomorrow.
Here is what I think will happen:
1) The Court will dismiss the case on lack of standing - and analyze the substantive legal arguments, stating that even if they had standing, there is no case
2) The Court will deny the Motion to Amend the Complaint on the grounds of futility
3) Rudy et al will appeal to the 3rd Circuit and will get denied without hearing
4) Rudy et al will appeal to SC and will get denied without hearing
Here is what is happening:
1) The Plaintiff's have the right to ASK to amend their Complaint at this stage but the Court need not grant the motion to file a second amended complaint - ie could deem the Second Amended Complaint as futile;
2) The Court gave the Plaintiff's the right to file a reply to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The Court is giving the Plaintiff's these options to make sure there is no procedural reason for an appeal;
3) The Court canceled the evidentiary hearing tomorrow.
Here is what I think will happen:
1) The Court will dismiss the case on lack of standing - and analyze the substantive legal arguments, stating that even if they had standing, there is no case
2) The Court will deny the Motion to Amend the Complaint on the grounds of futility
3) Rudy et al will appeal to the 3rd Circuit and will get denied without hearing
4) Rudy et al will appeal to SC and will get denied without hearing
Are we sure Ty Beard isn't working on this in disguise or something?
Are we sure Ty Beard isn't working on this in disguise or something?
It's fun to laugh at the incompetence, but I honestly feel like they're doing this all as a show for their base.
The fact that they're being laughed out of courtrooms doesn't matter really. It's all a performance to lend credence to the fact that the election was stolen.
If the court allows I would like to amend my previous statement that "45's legal team are idiots" to "45's legal team are fucking idiots".
Did I miss the deadline?
Holy shit I thought you were joking.Might make it if you fake the Judge's signature
They just tried that, I believe
Trumps legal team is having a normal one just trying to file the pleadings
Correct, polls already say 7/10 Republicans believe that Biden won due to fraud.They don't care if the complaints they're filing are valid or even sensible, Trump is just building a narrative of victimhood for his sheep.
Trumps legal team is having a normal one just trying to file the pleadings
They e-signed on a line that should have been left blank.
Which while certainly unintentional is remarkably unprofessional.
Trumps legal team is having a normal one just trying to file the pleadings
Thank you for parsing the information into an easy to understand summaryHere is what is happening:
1) The Plaintiff's have the right to ASK to amend their Complaint at this stage but the Court need not grant the motion to file a second amended complaint - ie could deem the Second Amended Complaint as futile;
2) The Court gave the Plaintiff's the right to file a reply to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The Court is giving the Plaintiff's these options to make sure there is no procedural reason for an appeal;
3) The Court canceled the evidentiary hearing tomorrow.
Here is what I think will happen:
1) The Court will dismiss the case on lack of standing - and analyze the substantive legal arguments, stating that even if they had standing, there is no case
2) The Court will deny the Motion to Amend the Complaint on the grounds of futility
3) Rudy et al will appeal to the 3rd Circuit and will get denied without hearing
4) Rudy et al will appeal to SC and will get denied without hearing