Not really. There's a difference in terms of marketing when a movie puts "93% ON ROTTEN TOMATOES!" on their commercials compared to "7.3 ON ROTTEN TOMATOES!"
Either Disney flexed a bit or the millions of articles made them change their minds
Could be they wanted to streamline and make Rottentomatoes itself more appealing for studios in general because the more movies reference the site in their ads the more people will go to said site. TV Spots already cite RottenTomatoe's TomatoMeter, so it isn't a stretch to think this isn't some type of way for them to believe they're keeping studios happy by hiding parts studios may dislike so they get continued free advertising. I figure this is why Metacritic isn't used as much in terms of boasting about your movies acclaim.
Yeah that makes a lot more sense
Has hell frozen over or am I agreeing with spatula
Jesus christ. The internet is so terrible. Why am I even here
I was astroturfing Wonder Park, an exciting tale of imagination and courage
They should start banning 90% of the professional critics then. They are just glorified user scores.
Maybe it was just a bad movie? Or how do you explain TFA having double the user rating of TLJ?
The Force Awakens has 230k User Reviews
Brah, I would never be that sad. That takes a lack of self awareness that borders on non sentience
She said she would like to be interviewed by more women and PoC journalists for the press circuit
Yawn.
Except you know critics are real people.
I'd assume cause some people see early screenings. But in all honesty its ended up becoming a hype or hate meter for the longest time now.
