Does she have a sister? I dont remember. Was that the bomber in the beginning ?
They'd better improve their humanoid CGI if they want China on board this time.At least she would have been a real person. The CGI Rose they went for in the movie just to appeal China was a weird decision.
Yeah, she would have been a much better fit for the story. Her speaking role was far more significant.Does she have a sister? I dont remember. Was that the bomber in the beginning ?
At least she would have been a real person. The CGI Rose they went for in the movie just to appeal to China was a weird decision.
How?You'll love it. Feels like a movie made for people with little stake in SW. Lots of making fun of Star Wars in it lol
it's the new Man of Steel lol
i'll be happy when we can all move on
Hopefully, he doesn't make any more Star Wars films. He's clearly a talented guy but he reminds me so much of Zach Snyder in his mentality.
The joke is that people here back in 2017 legitimately thought she was CGI.
Lol. You got one guys and gals, you can stop now.
Yeah, she would have been a much better fit for the story. Her speaking role was far more significant.
What if I told you that at one point on this site someone said exactly what I just said except they were being 100% serious
I think you're onto somethingOne might even suggest they should have switched the actors. Just saying.
I don't understand this. What do you mean by "wasting his time"?
My point was that you can criticize and even dislike TLJ without being belittled by people here. I know because I've done it.
I agree. I've criticized TLJ without being belittled too. But I don't see how that's related to what I'm talking about.
Crossing Eden and Katten were discussing RJ's hobby comment and how they don't understand people always being so persistently negative and critical when there's better things to do with your life. And yet Crossing Eden seems to have made it a hobby to spar with people he deems stupid. He doesn't' seem to have the same take away that RJ has. He doesn't seem bored with it. On the contrary he seems fueled by it. Its odd. What's he get out of that?
This is what I was originally responding to. I'm not sure why you seem to be equating extreme hate for RJ with people calling others out for not understanding basic plot points from a movie. It's really strange.You've made it your hobby to go online everyday and defend TLJ and belittle people you deem to not "get a movie made for kids."
It's a highly divisive film. Myself personally, I understand people thinking it's a cool movie, but I could never fathom "God tier".
I was never a part of the seething TLJ hate train, but I also don't think the film is very good, either. Where TFA has the problem of playing it too safe and being a rehash of ANH with no real worldbuilding or new and interesting content, TLJ overcorrects and makes a middling film trying to be subversive and different, without actually saying much of note.
That said, I can't believe all these people who personally go after Rian Johnson, who try to say he's untalented, as if to forget that he directed two of the best episodes in Breaking Bad's entire run. Ozymandias is the best TV episode of anything I've ever seen.
It's a highly divisive film. Myself personally, I understand people thinking it's a cool movie, but I could never fathom "God tier".
I was never a part of the seething TLJ hate train, but I also don't think the film is very good, either. Where TFA has the problem of playing it too safe and being a rehash of ANH with no real worldbuilding or new and interesting content, TLJ overcorrects and makes a middling film trying to be subversive and different, without actually saying much of note.
That said, I can't believe all these people who personally go after Rian Johnson, who try to say he's untalented, as if to forget that he directed two of the best episodes in Breaking Bad's entire run. Ozymandias is the best TV episode of anything I've ever seen.
It's a highly divisive film. Myself personally, I understand people thinking it's a cool movie, but I could never fathom "God tier".
Still waiting for someone to explain what these deep structural problems are beyond ambiguous subjective opinions about what you want star wars to be.
He directed "Fly", "Fifty-One", and most notably, "Ozymandias".I loved Last Jedi personally. Such a breath of fresh air
Which episodes of Breaking Bad he direct? I.e. what happened in em?
must be 🙄Did some youtuber make a vid with this talking point recently lmao
Imagine comparing the director of Ozymandias to Zack fucking Snyder
Can you link me that? Or if its in the thread let me know I've only seen last few pages. I'm geniunely interested because all Last Jedi crit I've read has been dog shitWe've had narrative directors on AAA properties spell these things out. If you're not willing to see it then you never will. Your premise is self defeating and impossible for you to lose by its very nature because people that want it to be better or different at all, by definition, want it to be something else.
Can you link me that? Or if its in the thread let me know I've only seen last few pages. I'm geniunely interested because all Last Jedi crit I've read has been dog shit
The entire debate has been had to death, so I'll just bring up a point that I see echoed the least: the three leads, Rey, Finn, and Poe are not given enough screentime together to build a likable dynamic similar to the one that Luke, Leia, and Han had.Still waiting for someone to explain what these deep structural problems are beyond ambiguous subjective opinions about what you want star wars to be.
Did some youtuber make a vid with this talking point recently lmao
Imagine comparing the director of Ozymandias to Zack fucking Snyder
It was the actual future that Luke saw.
Still waiting for someone to explain what these deep structural problems are beyond ambiguous subjective opinions about what you want star wars to be.
Not letting bad arguments be normalized is not the other coin of toxicity.This is really weird. You don't seem to realize that you're the other side of this coin.
this is just one of my criticisms, but, the whole canto bight-find the super hacker story line was an unnecessary venture added only to serve a predetermined 'failure' plot point that was imposed upon the movie by producers who wanted an esb analogue. the main characters gain nor lose anything, are barely emotionally involved and when they return empty handed the core narrative has not progressed in anyway other than some time wasted. going by the analogue to esb, in that movie a similar subplot has everyone but luke captured, they are betrayed by an old 'friend', han is tortured for nothing, flash frozen, and given to boba fett, c3po is blasted to bits, and leia is to be held captive on bespin. you get the sense that the empire can either bully or pay anybody off and there are no safe harbors while being pursued by the best bounty hunters the galaxy has to offer, they try to flee but end up right in the palm of vader's hand. plus the emotional peak of han and leia's relationship happens with that famous exchange right as han is lowered to his doom. i mean esb is so stacked with these types of moments that it feels unfair to compare the two.Still waiting for someone to explain what these deep structural problems are beyond ambiguous subjective opinions about what you want star wars to be.
I think you have one of the more interesting critiques here about this aspect of TLJ, but I think using comparison of this sort to judge a story is often a slippery slope. I think it is better to try and let a film stand on its own and judge it based on its own merits rather than through the lens of other stories. Besides, if fans continue to compare new Star Wars movies to ESB (one of the best movies ever made imho) they will be forever disappointed. Nonetheless, I think the argument that the 'failure' theme was weak because it lacked emotional resonance during the Finn and Rose subplot is one of the better critiques of the film I have seen so far. Unfortunately, the argument is riddled with the slipperiness of subjectivity. Although some of the 'failure' plot points failed to land for you, this aspect of the movie definitely landed for me thanks to how much I like these characters. Yeah, this film is indeed divisive.this is just one of my criticisms, but, the whole canto bight-find the super hacker story line was an unnecessary venture added only to serve a predetermined 'failure' plot point that was imposed upon the movie by producers who wanted an esb analogue. the main characters gain nor lose anything, are barely emotionally involved and when they return empty handed the core narrative has not progressed in anyway other than some time wasted. going by the analogue to esb, in that movie a similar subplot has everyone but luke captured, they are betrayed by an old 'friend', han is tortured for nothing, flash frozen, and given to boba fett, c3po is blasted to bits, and leia is to be held captive on bespin. you get the sense that the empire can either bully or pay anybody off and there are no safe harbors while being pursued by the best bounty hunters the galaxy has to offer, they try to flee but end up right in the palm of vader's hand. plus the emotional peak of han and leia's relationship happens with that famous exchange right as han is lowered to his doom. i mean esb is so stacked with these types of moments that it feels unfair to compare the two.
That says so much more about your taste than the quality of TLJ. The prequels are objectively poor films. It doesn't take a keen critical mind to see why. Just the eyes and ears to recognize wooden performances, awkward dialogue, and sloppy storytelling.It really isnt. I personally rather watch a prequel rather than TLJ.
Still waiting for someone to explain what these deep structural problems are beyond ambiguous subjective opinions about what you want star wars to be.
I genuinely can't understand where the "Johnson can't take criticism" bs started when the dude has consistently been like this. It's like those toxic people made up a persona for the dude so they could be more indignant and feel more justified in bashing not just the films but the man himself.I'm glad he's been able to deal with it in such a mature and healthy way. It's a shame that this kind of thing has just become a normal facet of life for people with any kind of fame and connected to a toxic fanbase.
It's just another hateful fantasy cooked up by recreational complainers.I genuinely can't understand where the "Johnson can't take criticism" bs started when the dude has consistently been like this. It's like those toxic people made up a persona for the dude so they could be more indignant and feel more justified in bashing not just the films but the man himself.
That says so much more about your taste than the quality of TLJ. The prequels are objectively poor films. It doesn't take a keen critical mind to see why. Just the eyes and ears to recognize wooden performances, awkward dialogue, and sloppy storytelling.
For example, Luke is grumpy and also not a super saiyan.