Yup. It's why many of the 'lolz, it's fine, outrage culture amirite' posts in this thread are pretty tone-deaf.This reminds me of something I saw in one of my Discord servers recently. Since sexualization of men is so often coded as gay, the inverse of Dragon's Crown would probably look something like this...
There's plenty of ways to sexualize men that both don't involve genitalia and that would be as offputting to straight men as Dragon's Crown is to women. Which, I don't imagine there would be calls for such games to be banned, exactly, but I imagine if half-naked femboys started popping up in a bunch of non-erotic AAA and AA games, I imagine straight male gamers would find themselves empathizing with that Polygon review real quick.
Boy, the gymnastics people will perform in this thread to pretty much ignore the blatantly obvious issues with the character designs and portrayal...
"It's not pornographic, it's braindead erotica for men!"
El. Oh. El.
Straight dudes don't think misogynistic stereotypes and objectification in a non-porn, T-rated game is a problem. News at 11, I guess.Im saying it wasnt a problem. If people find the sexualisation gross and offputting, that's fair. But its not what I'd identify as a problem.
If you only need malicious intent to consider portrayals as problematic, then almost nothing is ever a "problem", including any homophobic, transphobic or racist depictions. After all, they're just ignorant/misguided/didn't mean to maliciously demean those demographics. By that logic, the transphobia in Catherine is not problematic because the creators are not deliberately trying to be transphobic. The racism in Tintin wasn't a problem because Hergé was just misguided and ignorant, not malicious. Etc.I would consider creative choices that explicitly target demographics, groups, or individuals with overt intention to hurt, demean, condescend, etc to be most arguable candidates for having a "problem", as their intent is malicious and not in good faith. The core goal of these works is to hurt (in most cases) marginalised demographics.
Playboy is porn. This is a t-rated beat-em-up looting action-RPG.Wouldn't all of that apply to something like the Playboy as well?
Again, this isn't a porn game. This isn't Senran Kagura or even Dead or Alive. Previous Vanillaware game had the occasional skimpy outfits (e.g. Velvet in Odin Sphere, though she was still infinitely more tasteful than anyone in Dragon's Crown but the elf) but were never full of exaggerated, objectified designs like that and didn't constantly throw softcore hentai (again, always featuring sexualized women and not men) in your direction.To me it's far less insidous and far less offensive as say, naked Cortana in Halo games. Halo isn't a series whose visual style and make-up is designed around titilation, so naked busty Cortana seems gross and out of place. In Dragon's Crown ALL the designs are sexualized to the point of outrageous and so should be viewed from that perspective.
So to those saying you can't play it with your mom, sister or G/F in the room, i'm like... duh. It's not that kind of game. It's no different to how I wouldn't watch a Shannon Tweed movie with my mom or girlfriend either.
No need to imagine. Here's what happens when a Final Fantasy dude (in a mobile game, no less) receives a fraction of the skimpiness (and doesn't even have sexual poses or anything):Which, I don't imagine there would be calls for such games to be banned, exactly, but I imagine if half-naked femboys started popping up in a bunch of non-erotic AAA and AA games, I imagine straight male gamers would find themselves empathizing with that Polygon review real quick.
I think it's pretty telling that SE actually listened to them thus demonstrated they only care about complains related to character designs if they come from male gamers.No need to imagine. Here's what happens when a Final Fantasy dude (in a mobile game, no less) receives a fraction of the skimpiness (and doesn't even have sexual poses or anything):
(Note: such a backlash was enough to get that FF dude's design altered to be less skimpy before the game released, because it made dudes uncomfortable. lmfao)
Straight dudes don't think misogynistic stereotypes and objectification in a non-porn, T-rated game is a problem. News at 11, I guess.
You bring up the rating, and I agree with you that the rating is a problem, and that the reason it was able to come out with that rating is a problem. We're very much on the same page there.Playboy is porn. This is a t-rated beat-em-up looting action-RPG.
This actually (and unfortunately) looks tame compared to some of the comments about FFXV's cast that I read over the years. Here and in the old place people were usually more negative because of not having a female party member, but in most other places the tone of the criticism was pretty homophobic.No need to imagine. Here's what happens when a Final Fantasy dude (in a mobile game, no less) receives a fraction of the skimpiness (and doesn't even have sexual poses or anything):
(Note: such a backlash was enough to get that FF dude's design altered to be less skimpy before the game released, because it made dudes uncomfortable. lmfao)
I don't see how you suppose that even a single person in this thread is suggesting that they aren't allowed to exist...I don't see how erotic nor pornographic prasentations are neither allowed to exist.
Fair assessment I think. The game was fun but man....it just looks ridiculous, not "sexy."Its high level sexually pandering art. Like most things its not for everyone.
I don't see how you suppose that even a single person in this thread is suggesting that they aren't allowed to exist...
...The fact you are denying people to see DC as erotica for example.
...
...riiiiiight. I'm gonna place you on ignore now, you clearly have no interest in reading what I actually typed...
Again, this isn't a porn game. This isn't Senran Kagura or even Dead or Alive. Previous Vanillaware game had the occasional skimpy outfits (e.g. Velvet in Odin Sphere, though she was still infinitely more tasteful than anyone in Dragon's Crown but the elf) but were never full of exaggerated, objectified designs like that and didn't constantly throw softcore hentai (again, always featuring sexualized women and not men) in your direction.
People who make comments like this give a bad name to fans of the game.
I didn't know that until this thread either, and I was as shocked as when I found out the first Halo game was rated M.The most surprising thing I learned from this thread is that apparently Dragon's Crown was rated T.
No need to imagine. Here's what happens when a Final Fantasy dude (in a mobile game, no less) receives a fraction of the skimpiness (and doesn't even have sexual poses or anything):
(Note: such a backlash was enough to get that FF dude's design altered to be less skimpy before the game released, because it made dudes uncomfortable. lmfao)
It was Wol from Mobius Final Fantasy I believe.
I literally just had this experience yesterday.It's funny reading through this thread because it reminds me a lot of people recommend manga or anime to people who aren't really into those things, and they just straight-up forget that in episode 1, there's some actual real debauchery that is so normalized in the medium that they don't even consider it to be questionable. Like this mess:
Ye I didn't realise either lmaoThe most surprising thing I learned from this thread is that apparently Dragon's Crown was rated T.
It's an eroge. It always was, and the only reason why anyone remembers it was because of the crazy proportions on traditional-to-the-point-of-actually-boring designs.
The game was fun, I did enjoy it, but no one remembers it, or it as a love letter to DnD. Everyone remembers it because of the Sorceress' chest and the Barbarian's ass. The most dissapointing thing about it is that, as far as fanservice goes, it is Kamitari's most boring output. It really does feel like he or someone in charge of game design got bored with a straight-up DnD campaign like story and ended up injecting as much titillation as they could in order to keep people invested, something that wasn't done with Muramasa or Odin's Sphere or Grim Grimore. And when people took offense with it, the response of "maybe you just don't like the ladies", is pretty crass. Dragon's Crown is Vanillaware's most visually boring game. At least before 13 Sentinels, which I haven't played but from what I've seen, seems to be a menu simulator.
I literally just had this experience yesterday.
I don't watch much anime, but I was in the mood to watch some after recently watching my wife play Astral Chain.
I had heard a lot of praise for Kill la Kill, and I even knew it was going to be a show with a lot of sexualization (I'd seen enough imagery to know I was in for a lot of underboob, at the very least), but none of the comments I had seen prepared me for that first episode.
The main character is a sexualized teenager, which isn't great to begin with. But this other supporting female character, who they say is also a teenager, totally just looks like she's 8, and they sexualize her too. At one point, they hang her upside down so you can see some pretty extreme underboob.
That show is pretty disgusting.
I like the reinterpretation of rococo art throught the lens of fantasy cartoonish exaggeration, it's quite unique. But I understand why it doesn't sit well with the prudes.
Trigger in general is overrated and vapid, check out Kimetsu no Yaiba for better designs and amazing animationI literally just had this experience yesterday.
I don't watch much anime, but I was in the mood to watch some after recently watching my wife play Astral Chain.
I had heard a lot of praise for Kill la Kill, and I even knew it was going to be a show with a lot of sexualization (I'd seen enough imagery to know I was in for a lot of underboob, at the very least), but none of the comments I had seen prepared me for that first episode.
The main character is a sexualized teenager, which isn't great to begin with. But this other supporting female character, who they say is also a teenager, totally just looks like she's 8, and they sexualize her too. At one point, they hang her upside down so you can see some pretty extreme underboob.
That show is pretty disgusting.
I don't know if that kind of action stuff is really for me.Trigger in general is overrated and vapid, check out Kimetsu no Yaiba for better designs and amazing animation
Fair, she's very good. I need to catch up with CaroleI don't know if that kind of action stuff is really for me.
The two recent things that have clicked for me were Carole & Tuesday and Violet Evergarden.
And keeping in line with the Dragon's Crown talk, I adore The Woman Called Fujiko Mine. That's my kind of pervy, not that Kill la Kill crap that sexualizes children.
really? you don't see a problem with this picture whatsoever? since when do humans actually stand like this? or when do wizards usually snuggle their staff in between their asses? this picture is almost like those kids highlights magazines where on the cover you gotta spot a dozen things wrong with the picture Lol.There was no intent on my part to hide anything. Is there anything inherently "offensive" about that picture, though? Is a stylized, sexy picture of a woman problematic in and of itself?