Happy environmentally-conscious parents that aren't husks are the myth!
I almost started to write something meaningful in this thread, read two pages, and hoo boy.
Please reach out and get some help Hawkster.Frankly, at this point, having children is morally and ethically irresponsible.
Why would you wanna put them into lots of trauma knowing the world is gonna die out
Frankly, at this point, having children is morally and ethically irresponsible.
Why would you wanna put them into lots of trauma knowing the world is gonna die out
Frankly, at this point, having children is morally and ethically irresponsible.
Why would you wanna put them into lots of trauma knowing the world is gonna die out
Frankly, at this point, having children is morally and ethically irresponsible.
Why would you wanna put them into lots of trauma knowing the world is gonna die out
I don't think it's that far out there to say that the single most destructive act you can do to the planet is to have a child in a developed first-world country. No matter how environmentally conscious we are, I'd wager that barely any of us really give back more than we take when all is said and done.This is the dumbest take on the subject. If you really give a shit about the environment, you'd have children with which to raise responsibly with this message to make sure your level of consideration is sustained for future generations, rather than leaving the world to the people who do not care.
This is the dumbest take on the subject. If you really give a shit about the environment, you'd have children with which to raise responsibly with this message to make sure your level of consideration is sustained for future generations, rather than leaving the world to the people who do not care.
Best choice would be adopting unwanted children and doing the same.
This is the dumbest take on the subject. If you really give a shit about the environment, you'd have children with which to raise responsibly with this message to make sure your level of consideration is sustained for future generations, rather than leaving the world to the people who do not care.
feel the same but only have 1 kid (2 years old)Exactly.
My kids (all four of them) complete me. It is amazing to pour your love and knowledge into a child and watch them grow. It has made me a better, more responsible person with a higher fulfillment in life. Traveling the world is fun and important, but I would take my kids in a heartbeat every day of the week.
I thought that on average hunter gatherers had a better work-life balance and generally less stress? That it was the dawn of agriculture that ensnared us toward the modern day way of life.At the very least, you'll give them a better life than the 200,000+ years of brutal hunting and gathering that encompasses the bulk of humanity's existence up until the last 10,000 years.
Sure. So are these people in this thread who claim to be childless because it's the right thing for the environment adopting?
It's true that they worked less, but life expectancy was less than half the current average due to exposure, disease, and having to hunt or being hunted themselves. Kids born now should have more comfortable lives overall even if shit goes really downhill in coming decades. It's people born after the latter occurs who might not be better off than our ancestors.I thought that on average hunter gatherers had a better work-life balance and generally less stress? That it was the dawn of agriculture that ensnared us toward the modern day way of life.
Sure. So are these people in this thread who claim to be childless because it's the right thing for the environment adopting?
Ah if you're comparing with everything modern life brings, medicine and all, then sure, of course. I was speaking more to the 'brutal' part as had read it as meaning the hunting and gathering itself was particularly brutal relative to society today.It's true that they worked less, but life expectancy was less than half the current average due to exposure, disease, and having to hunt or being hunted themselves. Kids born now should have more comfortable lives overall even if shit goes really downhill in coming decades. It's people born after the latter occurs who might not be better off than our ancestors.
Could just be an educator or advocate, without creating an extra human.This is the dumbest take on the subject. If you really give a shit about the environment, you'd have children with which to raise responsibly with this message to make sure your level of consideration is sustained for future generations, rather than leaving the world to the people who do not care.
That's what money is for
what are these dumb takes. if you dont want a kid, just say it and quit finding dumb excusesCould just be an educator or advocate, without creating an extra human.
I have 4, suck it down.Frankly, at this point, having children is morally and ethically irresponsible.
It is an absolutely terrible idea to have a child with any hope they'll solve environmental crises to offset the impact of your decision to have them.
i don't get the avatar shaming and My first tree donation is on page 2 of that thread already
Read my post again, I never actually said that. Then go to my tree planting thread and contribute.
How is that a bad take? Educators and advocates can be just as influential on shaping the way people think as their parents.what are these dumb takes. if you dont want a kid, just say it and quit finding dumb excuses
if you cared about the environment, go do something about it. dont travel, dont eat meat, dont drive, dont browse resetera,...
How is that a bad take? Educators and advocates can be just as influential on shaping the way people think as their parents.
We do all sorts of things that aren't good if your only goal is perpetuating the human race.It took millions of years of evolution and mating to produce a creature that says "what's in it for me?"
Massive environmental impact? Are you crazy?Yes, I have no problem saying I would prefer to continue to live rather than kill myself because of the potential negative environmental impact of my existence.
But many parents are in denial of massive environmental impact of their decision to have children.
I have no quarrel with anyone who says they decided to have children despite the massive environmental impact.
fair enough, but not pointed directly at you, using the environment for why you dont want kids is a dumb excuse. im not against people who dont want kids, just dont try and make yourself seem bigger than people who want/have kidsHow is that a bad take? Educators and advocates can be just as influential on shaping the way people think as their parents.
I don't have or want kids. I don't travel much and bike when I can. I don't eat meat except chicken and fish maybe once a week. I teach environmental science courses to college freshmen. But I guess I don't care about the environment because I'm browsing Resetera? Whether my reasons for not wanting kids are selfish or altruistic are irrelevant in light of the impacts, or lack thereof.
Don't forget that you're saving the environment as well.Joke's on OP. I don't even have a car, so I save even more money every year by not paying for insurance, fuel, MOTs and repairs.