I think its 2x 6-8hrs by the looks of it (as one campaign for each character).
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Resident Evil 2 Review Thread
- Thread starter Dusk Golem
- Start date
I think its 2x 6-8hrs by the looks of it (as one campaign for each character).
So open critic has one of the reviews listed incorrectly:
The actual score they gave it:
It's currently at a 90 on OpenCritic. I'm guessing it will go up once they fix that.
The actual score they gave it:
It's currently at a 90 on OpenCritic. I'm guessing it will go up once they fix that.
Huber is very strict with his reviews. He even goes stricter if it's a game he enjoys a lot
So open critic has one of the reviews listed incorrectly:
The actual score they gave it:
It's currently at a 90 on OpenCritic. I'm guessing it will go up once they fix that.
lmao that's one hell of a mistake
Very happy with the reviews although I'm a bit disappointed about the way Capcom chose to handle the alternative play-throughs. It appears they tried to force replayability and inflate the game's length. Also as expected the game takes less than 10 hours to beat.
One run is 6 hours or both combined? That's pretty long. They must have added a bunch of stuff.
Same here, as long as the game is fun and has other modes and secrets, it's fine by me.
A mercenaries or extreme battle mode would be awesome...
Of course not. That would be horrible.
I loved Alien Isolation, but I acknowledge that some people might have hated it. Still, Mr. X is not anywhere near the same type of stalker as the Xenomorph was in Isolation.
I am sure you'll enjoy it. Honestly. It's great.
Nobody is going to do a three hour run on their first run, lol.
Yeah, it was pretty glaring when you see only one on the page that is listed as 65 or below.
Thanks for the response. I've been avoiding a lot of material on this game, so I didn't know it was already discussed, but this is something I really wanted to know about. The more streamlined approach sounds good to me. Thanks again.
Maybe Stevivor put the wrong score and it really is 1/10?So open critic has one of the reviews listed incorrectly:
The actual score they gave it:
It's currently at a 90 on OpenCritic. I'm guessing it will go up once they fix that.
/s
Honestly, the lack of classic es RE enemy variety is disappointing. Not sure why even crows couldn't made it...
Can any reviewers comment on laser sights since it was an option int he demo version's Option menu?
Can you upgrade weapons to include laser sights or are these restricted to specific weapons or how does that work?
Something, something...realism? I wouldn't mind it that much if at least they had replaced it with something new and interest. Alas, they replaced it with nothing apparently. Bizarre choice.
Can you upgrade weapons to include laser sights or are these restricted to specific weapons or how does that work?
Something, something...realism? I wouldn't mind it that much if at least they had replaced it with something new and interest. Alas, they replaced it with nothing apparently. Bizarre choice.
So open critic has one of the reviews listed incorrectly:
The actual score they gave it:
It's currently at a 90 on OpenCritic. I'm guessing it will go up once they fix that.
They just fixed it. It is back up to a 92 on OpenCritic now.
Or they use the full scale and they thought the game was very good?
I think they meant 6 hours for the first character on the first run. If they beat both in under six hours, then that would mean they got A ranks for both scenarios on the first attempt, which is really unlikely.
The other reviews mention that the first attempt for both characters last well over 10 hours.
Probably because the aiming system isn't as agile as 4 and 5 and crows would pose a significant problem when trying to aim? That's my guess.
The easiest way to describe how they handle the story is that the events stay the same but the character you play as doesn't.
It's hard to explain - but this time we have ONE storyline. We don't have any more debates about whether a certain character got infected, or where and when a certain character died. It's just one type of events that you experience from two different sides.
Or they thought the game deserved a 7? Giving BotW a 6 also isn;t some crazy thing.
For what it's worth, console versions don't have a 30fps/4K or 60fps/1080p options. The game seems to just be at the 60fps option and that's it.
Gamespot with a spoiler straight of the gate. Never watching their reviews again. Unbelievable.
[EDIT]
May not be a spoiler to some people, I guess?
[EDIT]
May not be a spoiler to some people, I guess?
Last edited:
oh maybe i'm not in a cynial mood today but i just thought while you wouldn't want to give the review job to a fanboy, it being a remake you might want to just to see how it measures up to the OG game. also i don't have many doubts about their "journalistic ingerity" so even from a fanboy if they gave it a 10 i wouldn't be "yeah, but..."
I agree. In the games confirmed so far in 2019, I don't see many 90+ Metacritic score candidate : RE2, Sekiro and...
Are both campaigns significantly distinct or is there so much overlap that only a very small portion of Leon's and Claire's campaigns differ?
There's no graphical options on a Pro, anyway. It's 4K, checkerboard presumably, with a variable frame rate that comfortably averages more than 30. Feels like 45-ish but I could be way off.
