A lot of people don't complain about GTA5's controls on PC for a reason my dude. The fact that the game is moddable changes quite a bit.
October 9th for screens and specs, not sure on footage.
woah, really?
it absolutely did not. they never mentioned the word Steam. the fact that Rockstar specifically mentioned Steam is a red flag that there was no Epic deal
It's literally not
no, they absolutely didn't because those questions did not apply to those other use cases. this is a completely different situation. no publisher has announced an imminent Steam release date while launching the game on multiple other platforms as a part of an "exclusivity" deal with Epic. this situation doesn't benefit Epic. it doesn't hurt Steam either. the only person it helps is Rockstar, as it will drive some traffic to their launcher for day one sales with a higher share without affecting their main RDR2 PC revenue driver, Steam. Epic gets overshadowed and no one buys the game on their store. you can't address that fundamental point. there's no use arguing with you about this. you selectively quote sentences out of context and argue only against one or two points without addressing the larger argument because there's no argument to be had. Epic paying for this type of arrangement would be absurd, as they are the people that lose out. you are letting the strength of your feelings about Epic cloud any understanding of their rational self-interest
That's another blantant lie.
Again: the question isn't whether or not Epic does successfully benefit from a deal or if they successfully do hurt Steam - the question is still whether or not Epic paid R* to delay a release on Steam. Pretty much everything indicates that the answer is: yes.
Your "larger argument" is mostly based on misinterpretations and false assumptions (like the deleted tweets which you absolutely ignored for some reasons). I personally do not care where or when RDR2 gets released on PC but you shouldn't outright claim false statements.
it's spelled "blatant," but you should provide evidence that i lied or withdraw. calling someone a liar because they disagree with you is extremely childish
no, there is actually no indication other than a lot of people on a forum speculating
the outright false statements like the ones you're making? how can i respond to deleted tweets whose content you can't describe or explain in any way? you are only using the fact that there are supposedly deleted tweets to impugn Zhuge's credibility. how do i know there wasn't a typo he immediately corrected? you are being so misleading.
cool. In case you want to know why your claim is false: just look at Coffeestain Studios or Yager and how they confirmed their Steam releases when they announced their EGS exclusivity.
If a company repeats a tactic 50 times in a row with the same outcome - and right now we see the 51th time the same outcome in a row - then it's pretty likely that they also used the same tactic again.
You could have followed the thread. Seems like you decided to not do that.
In this case you are kinda correct because Gearbox didn't use the word Steam but announced that BL3 is only a 6-month temporary EGS exclusive and "will be available to purchase from other digital distribution platforms".
it is not "kinda correct." it is correct and making false statements without doing your proper research then calling *other* people liars when you are the one making false claims is inadvisable. but thank you for admitting that falsehood and retracting it.
they did not announce an imminent steam release. they did not launch on multiple other platforms. saying there is one year of exclusivity is not announcing an imminent Steam release
they did not announce an imminent Steam release either or launch on multiple other platforms. you need to actually read my statements before you call them lies. I never said no publisher has confirmed the game will eventually come to other storefronts. the statement you called a lie was, again, direct quote, that "no publisher has announced an imminent Steam release date while launching the game on multiple other platforms as a part of an "exclusivity" deal with Epic." that is true. you just cited two examples of games with lengthy exclusivity windows who confirmed they would eventually come to other storefronts. that is a completely different thing than announcing an "imminent Steam release." hopefully you can admit to the second falsehood, retract your statement that I am a liar, and you can apologize and move on from this ridiculous farce and you will learn to do your research and read carefully next time before you defame someone
yes, i absolutely did. they did not launch on multiple other platforms and they did not announce imminent Steam release dates. period. what other platform did The Cycle simultaneously launch on? none: it launched only on EGS. what other platform did Satisfactory simultaneously launch on: none, it launched on EGS. when did The Cycle or Saisfactory announce imminent Steam release dates as a part of the EGS exclusivity announcement? they didn't. you need to retract your false and defamatory statement.
I think it's a possibility they'll adjust the latency/fluid movement for when you're using mouse and keyboard, because that's precisely what they did with the PC-version of GTA V.
It's not launching on GOG. In fact, although 2K has been putting loads of their older titles on GOG ( I know cuz I keep re-buy 'em there), not a single Rockstar game has made the jump.
My 1070 has trouble running many games @1440p/60 fps with high settings.
Or those people just didn't like the game much. I literally bought an XB1X for this game and I thought the original was better by a mile. It was not fun to play through in my opinion.
