Not even the best FromSoftware game. To be fair, the best FromSoftware game might be the best game ever made.
But this weird jerking the game gets here is ridiculous. Personal favorite is one thing, we all have our tastes and that's fine, but there's no way in hell it is the best game ever made. I'll say it is the best PS4 exclusive by a light year.
Trolls all over the thread....
You'll be one of them, sooner or later
No. Accessibility is a relevant metric, and it's one that Bloodborne fails at spectacularly
Do you run down checklists of features when you decide which games are your favorite? Lol
So you're criticizing a challenging game for being... challenging?It's overly difficult and punishing, and its storyline requires significant effort to even figure out what's happening
How? The cosmic, Lovecraftian insanity ramps right up as you reach the end. How could it be worse?GOAT at the start, gets progressively weaker as you get towards the end.
How? The cosmic, Lovecraftian insanity ramps right up as you reach the end. How could it be worse?
Yeah I can see where you're coming from. Werewolves and vampires and all that jazz was really awesome in the beginning, but I certainly have a soft spot for all things Lovecraft. Each to their ownConceptually, it's great. But fighting reurrecting Yharnamites, the mess of The One Reborn, and entering the Dream of Mensis is kind of deflating for me. Feels like a random assortment of assets that Fromsoft stitched together, and not a peek behind the veil of reality. Mergo is lame, and The First Hunter is a bit too "anime" for my liking.
Again, incredible introduction but falters too much with its execution of some very cool ideas. Stronger as a Van Helsing simulator.
Yes. And the fact that 1 out of 5 people can actually agree on this on this forum should solidify that it actually is.
So you're criticizing a challenging game for being... challenging?
Yes. And the fact that 1 out of 5 people can actually agree on this on this forum should solidify that it actually is.
It's one thing to say "this game is my favorite", it's another to say 'this game is the best". The distinction here is important.These threads are always about personal tastes. There's no widely accepted consensus on the best game ever made.
If 20% of all humans think it's the best game ever, I'll take that.
I doubt more than 5% of the worlds population have heard of Bloodborne, yeah.I doubt even .01% of all humans will find it to be the GOAT tbh... if you're appeasing to a popularity contest over the entire population pretty sure a mobile game will win GOAT.
I doubt more than 5% of the worlds population have heard of Bloodborne, yeah.
Because it's also a very Nintendo centric forum, and most people probably consider BOTW the goat.Don't get it. This is a heavily Playstation / hardcore / From Software centric forum. I'm actually surprised the number isn't higher.
BB is definitely in my top 10 GOAT.
Those are some interesting leaps and false equivalencies. I think you underestimate how popular games like Bloodborne (and Souls, Sekiro, Nioh, etc.) are. They sell a lot, they get a lot of awards and have big playerbases, and they are designed to be challenging. That is not a flaw, that is what the subgenre is based on. I wouldn't mind if they added an "easy" mode to Souls for people who don't want to put in the time to get good and beat them, but I don't consider them inaccessible, and not every game has to appeal to every single player out there. I don't call RTS or 4X games inaccessible, because I have to think about my moves. Or having to learn my weapons and enemies in Monster Hunter. It's fine if a game is designed this way, and the challenge in Bloodborne is not "bullshit" for it to be a flaw.Yes. I'm also criticizing a cryptic game for being... cryptic. Some people who are sensitive to that sort of thing are also criticizing a game with poor performance for having... poor performance. I didn't notice that part but it's a valid enough criterion that it should also be... considered.
Games that are too challenging are games... that people don't want to play. If people don't want to play a game... it's not accessible. If it's not accessible... it's flawed. If it's not accessible to the extent that this game is... it's not in the running for greatest game of all time.
Because it's also a very Nintendo centric forum, and most people probably consider BOTW the goat.
Those are some interesting leaps and false equivalencies. I think you underestimate how popular games like Bloodborne (and Souls, Sekiro, Nioh, etc.) are. They sell a lot, they get a lot of awards and have big playerbases, and they are designed to be challenging. That is not a flaw, that is what the subgenre is based on. I wouldn't mind if they added an "easy" mode to Souls for people who don't want to put in the time to get good and beat them, but I don't consider them inaccessible, and not every game has to appeal to every single player out there. I don't call RTS or 4X games inaccessible, because I have to think about my moves. Or having to learn my weapons and enemies in Monster Hunter. It's fine if a game is designed this way, and the challenge in Bloodborne is not "bullshit" for it to be a flaw.
You absolutely can't say it's equal to games having poor performance, no game is designed from the ground up to with poor performance.