Let's assume, because at this point that's all we can do, that the pro runs it locked 60fps most of the time. Let's just assume. If that was the case, then the X will also run it the same or better. Which means that the difference in power, which is about a third, is going to waste.
Now, power isn't all the same. Cpu deals with things differently to gpu. But here I see a graphically intensive game but not cpu intensive.
Regardless... if the game was cpu bound, they should be able to increase resolution without much getting in the way. If it's gpu bound then the pro will likely run utterly piss poor compared to the x at release.
It doesn't make any sort of sense. There's a reason that you usually see a 1080p/1440p or 1440p/4k divide, and that's because the power difference between the two make it easy.
It's essentially, if done right, possible to get the X release higher res by default, because there will be power gone to waste.
That's why it doesn't make sense. You can use the exact same optimisations and set up on one machine and then just use that on X and have performance to spare.
All of this is telling me one thing... the Pro will run really badly. And that's a massive shame. It's also making me worried about about base consoles.
