Damn, I guess standard HDR works though right? Just thinking of getting the spider-man into the spiderverse blu ray to test it
Yeah, HDR works
Damn, I guess standard HDR works though right? Just thinking of getting the spider-man into the spiderverse blu ray to test it
You can take consolation in the fact that you wouldn't have to worry about burn-in and still have good color accuracies.Sigh, unfortunately return policies in Singapore are not as consumer friendly as in the US, UK or EU so I couldn't even upgrade to the CX if I wanted to. This stings especially hard because I was all set to get the CX before I decided to do the financially responsible thing and settled for this TV at less than half the price for a larger model. Sorry for ranting, but the prospect of staring at what could be a pretty expensive mistake for the next 5 years is really bumming me out.
In the meantime I've sent an angry email to Sony's customer support. I suggest everyone affected by this do the same.
LG OLED isn't perfect, it's not the best choice for gaming either.This is such bullshit. How come there is no nice gaming TV that doesn't cost as much as LG OLEDs? Especially outside of US as there are even less options there without the Hisense/TCL/VIzio
No offense, but who gives a shit about 4k 120?
Dude, nothing is going to hit that outside of some indie games.
Even 120 honestly. I will be surprised if in year 3 and beyond there is 120 fps games.
No offense, but who gives a shit about 4k 120?
Dude, nothing is going to hit that outside of some indie games.
Even 120 honestly. I will be surprised if in year 3 and beyond there is 120 fps games.
If there are, it will be in the vast, vast minority.
🙄 Please people, don't waste time and money trying to chase a perfect scenario. Do your research of pros and cons for things you're looking for and let price be a factor as well.
The X900h can be gotten for $1k and for that price it has to be one of the best out there. Not just for the display, but for the overall quality. Plus, I really don't see a whole lot of meaningful gaming 120fps in the future.
Awful post.No offense, but who gives a shit about 4k 120?
Dude, nothing is going to hit that outside of some indie games.
Even 120 honestly. I will be surprised if in year 3 and beyond there is 120 fps games.
If there are, it will be in the vast, vast minority.
I can almost guarantee you, you will not be disappointed. Nothings perfect as you see with this situation, but the overall package is dope.Yeah, this. I researched quite well and know this TV will be absolutely perfect for me personally while also being reasonably priced.
100% agree. The X900H should be more than serviceable for the vast majority, because in that price range it pretty much over-delivers and not everyone (not to say only a small fraction of gamers/early adopters) is able to shell out more for a new TV alongside all the buy-in costs you have for a new gen console anyway. No matter what you choose, there's always something to nitpick, and these are "issues" I can certainly live with. There's no better option in that price range anyway, at least to my knowledge.🙄 Please people, don't waste time and money trying to chase a perfect scenario. Do your research of pros and cons for things you're looking for and let price be a factor as well.
The X900h can be gotten for $1k and for that price it has to be one of the best out there. Not just for the display, but for the overall quality.
Pretty much this. I went back and forth with so many TV's and then I noticed I am researching 2000$ sets which is CRAZY. Also those sets have some drawbacks as well - like I said, there is no perfect TV.🙄 Please people, don't waste time and money trying to chase a perfect scenario. Do your research of pros and cons for things you're looking for and let price be a factor as well.
The X900h can be gotten for $1k and for that price it has to be one of the best out there. Not just for the display, but for the overall quality. Plus, I really don't see a whole lot of meaningful gaming 120fps in the future.
This is why you never buy hardware on the promise of a firmware update later on.
Glad I waited to get my next-gen TV.
Several games have already announced 4k 120fps modes. I think it'll be more common than people are expecting, especially among indies and remasters.
Issue is that not even the CX is perfect (although it is right now the best 2.1 option). 4K@120Hz with HDR works great but enabling VRR causes dark areas to flicker. In addition, I appears that eARC and VRR don't play well together either. Basically, VRR on TVs is botched in general.
Exactly. I went through two other TVs before trying the X900h and couldn't be happier for what I spent.100% agree. The X900H should be more than serviceable for the vast majority, because in that price range it pretty much over-delivers and not everyone (not to say only a small fraction of gamers/early adopters) is able to shell out more for a new TV alongside all the buy-in costs you have for a new gen console anyway. No matter what you choose, there's always something to nitpick, and these are "issues" I can certainly live with. There's no better option in that price range anyway, at least to my knowledge.
Same.Pretty much this. I went back and forth with so many TV's and then I noticed I am researching 2000$ sets which is CRAZY. Also those sets have some drawbacks as well - like I said, there is no perfect TV.
Got the x900h for under 1k and its perfect so far.
That already happened. This is what the thread is about.Okay just saw the digital trends channel, where they claim that the new firmware update will add VRR and maybe 4k 120hz to the sony tv.
Oh my bad. The video I saw said it's not out yet and this was shot 6 days ago.
Oh my bad. The video I saw said it's not out yet and this was shot 6 days ago.
Doesn't look horrendous to me, sounds like hyperbole. Probably just bypasses some image sharpening post-processing that they do at lower throughputs.I re-hosted the images from AVSForum - this is horrendous! (120 Hz first if it needed pointing out!)
JFC these guys are so far up their own arse with the "lol soundbars" mantra. Yes everyone knows that a dedicated speaker setup >>>> soundbar setup but they really take the holier-than-thou-ness of that to new levels.Thanks for the suggestion. I don't really know enough about the AVR issue to comment on it but I'll add a threadmark to the ongoing discussions on AVS Forum and Reddit:
Reddit - Dive into anything
www.reddit.com
What's a good non-OLED 65" TV on par with the LG CX? I really don't want to drop 2 grand on just a TV.
🙄 Please people, don't waste time and money trying to chase a perfect scenario. Do your research of pros and cons for things you're looking for and let price be a factor as well.
The X900h can be gotten for $1k and for that price it has to be one of the best out there. Not just for the display, but for the overall quality. Plus, I really don't see a whole lot of meaningful gaming 120fps in the future.
No offense, but who gives a shit about 4k 120?
Dude, nothing is going to hit that outside of some indie games.
Even 120 honestly. I will be surprised if in year 3 and beyond there is 120 fps games.
If there are, it will be in the vast, vast minority.
No offense, but who gives a shit about 4k 120?
Dude, nothing is going to hit that outside of some indie games.
Even 120 honestly. I will be surprised if in year 3 and beyond there is 120 fps games.
If there are, it will be in the vast, vast minority.
This must be about the 15th time I've written this. I'm not sure why people are trying so hard to downplay the option to have the best image quality available to them. Especially as
Feeding a 4K 120hz signal doesn't require a 4K 120hz rendered piece of content, but it requires you to be able to A send it from the source device, get it across a cable and have the display process it.
Obviously, we know what resolution does, but we have seen many titles that render above the alledged sweet spot of 1440p on consoles, whether this is natively or it is via checkerboard.
Unless you're plan is for games to render at a
Even when those games are 30fps, there are benefits.
As for the refresh rate, there are multiple reasons we want 120hz
Even if the game is 30fps, this can reduce input latency.
For non vsync'd or adaptive sync games this can make tears appear nearer the top of the screen.
This can help reduce judder in games with poor framepacing.
This also facilitates Wider VRR ranges.If you are running at 60hz, then you will be limited to a VRR range of 20-30fps and 40-60fps. Leaving a gap of 30-40fps meaning potential residual judder/tearing.
Having a 120hz display means you can cover 20-60fps easily with VRR AND go above 60fps.
Do not buy something based on a promise future firmware update. You don't know how that will turn out. There's been examples of gotchas that came up after firmware updates have been released or heck even the upcoming Yamaha receiver has a hardware bug preventing the promised firmware from functioning properly with HDMI 2.1.
We don't know yet. There's "speculation" because of no dolby vision logo on the box. That's it. At least on the PS5 that is. The stuff is still under embargo.slightly off topic question but is it true that neither series X or PS5 when playing UHD blu rays support dolby vision?
Dude, nothing is going to hit that outside of some indie games.
Pretty much this. I went back and forth with so many TV's and then I noticed I am researching 2000$ sets which is CRAZY. Also those sets have some drawbacks as well - like I said, there is no perfect TV.
Got the x900h for under 1k and its perfect so far.
No offense, but who gives a shit about 4k 120?
Dude, nothing is going to hit that outside of some indie games.
Even 120 honestly. I will be surprised if in year 3 and beyond there is 120 fps games.
If there are, it will be in the vast, vast minority.
The versus matchmaking suite can go all the way to the system's 120fps maximum all while running at 4K resolution. I immediately booted my PC version of the game and created dummy lobbies in order to create like-for-like comparisons to show you how a $500 console's 120fps mode compares to the same thing on a $1,500+ PC: If you're struggling to notice any differences, you're not alone.
What's crazier is, these crisp, detailed images full of handsome touches are appearing in isolation, as opposed to the dazzlingly smooth flipbook effect of running, somersaulting, and shotgunning at 120fps. Yet Xbox Series X doesn't sweat in rendering these frames at a blistering 8.33 millisecond threshold with barely any noticeable lurches in my hours of testing (and, again, with zero noticeable noise spewing out of the console at peak load).