My point was that you appeared to argue that anthropomorphic cartoon animals were inherently sexual. Seeing media featuring anthropomorphic cartoon animals as a "scene" is unnecessarily reductive.
Approximately half of the respondents reported being in a relationship, of which 76% were in a relationship with another member of furry fandom.
[16] Examples of sexual aspects within furry fandom include erotic art and furry-themed
cybersex.
[45][46] The term "
yiff" is sometimes used to indicate sexual activity or sexual material within the fandom—this applies to sexual activity and interaction within the subculture whether in the form of cybersex or
offline.
[47][48]
Sexual attraction to furry characters is a polarizing issue. In one survey with 4,300 furry respondents, 37% answered that sexual attraction is important in their furry activities, 38% were ambivalent, and 24% answered that it has little or nothing to do with their furry activities.
[44] In a different online survey, 33% of furry respondents answered that they have a "significant sexual interest in furry", another 46% stated they have a "minor sexual interest in furry", and the remaining 21% stated they have a "non-sexual interest in furry". The survey specifically avoided adult-oriented websites to prevent bias.
[17] Another survey found that 96.3% of male furry respondents reported viewing furry pornography, compared with 78.3% of female; males estimated 50.9% of all furry art they view is pornographic, compared with 30.7% female. Furries have a slight preference for pornographic furry artwork over non-pornographic artwork. 17.1% of males reported that when they viewed pornography it is exclusively or near-exclusively furry pornography, and only about 5% reported that pornography was the top factor which got them into the fandom.
en.wikipedia.org
And i fail to see how its not a "scene" if scene is simply shorthand for a subculture.