• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

How hyped are you?

  • A little hyped

    Votes: 98 15.7%
  • A lot of hyped

    Votes: 50 8.0%
  • WALNUUUUUTSSSSS

    Votes: 222 35.5%
  • Hyped enough to eat this whole bag of walnuts

    Votes: 63 10.1%
  • Hyped enough to bite this moose

    Votes: 37 5.9%
  • Hyped enough to scramble a dozen eggs

    Votes: 39 6.2%
  • Hyped enough to be even more hyped, like, cyclical or something

    Votes: 116 18.6%

  • Total voters
    625
Status
Not open for further replies.

Doctor Avatar

Member
Jan 10, 2019
2,594
I mean if you want to be cynical, he could have just taken the usual 12tf speculated on, added 0.1 to make it look more precise and back calculated from there. I know that also seems unlikely, but if anything people seem to go a long way to post drivel. Personally, I haven't seen anything compelling to have an idea of where PS5 will go yet. Still, there does seem to be far more talk that the systems will be close, and there seems some issues with github stuff lining up now.

Getting three variables - TF, CU count and clock speed completely spot on to decimal points of accuracy is pretty lucky.
And he also stated it was RDNA2 when nobody else believed that. Also correct.

I think it's far more likely he knows something than he doesn't given all of that. But he may just have been ridiculously lucky, I guess we will see.
 

ManOfWar

Member
Jan 6, 2020
2,469
Brazil
Maybe he was just incredibly lucky.

He also said Bluepoint were making a Castlevania game didn't he? Now we've got all the rumours of Sony buying the Castlevania licence.

Again I'm not saying he's definitely right, but it's definitely something to keep in the mix. He's gotten a LOT of stuff seemingly right.

It's probably a lucky guess. It would be different if he had said anything about the difference in memmory bandwidth. That would be unusual and all the sofa engineers posing as specialists would have laughed at.
 

dom

▲ Legend ▲
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
10,445
he also refused to get verified. sent a mod a photoshopped photo and then bailed without ever defending himself.

i think its just a lucky guess. anyone with a basic knowledge of tflops can come up with 12 tflops with different configurations. he likely chose 52 cu because no one else was going with it at the time.
I was thinking it could be 52 active with 4 disabled to help with yields. Never said anything here though. Then all you have to do is work backwards to get just over 12TFs. So you take 1000*12/(52*64*2) and round up a decimal to get 1.81
 

Nayeon

Member
Oct 29, 2017
329
User warned: Metacommentary.
Me too tbh... We've lost half the community.
Nothing of value was lost. All we lost are people who refused to acknowledge hat Github is completely wrong. I mean, look at Xbox, nothing of it was true yet they somehow thought it's still spot on for PS5. All they did was project their console bias. I'm glad these people are gone. Finally we can have a civilized discussion and not have that pendulum swing from 7 to 13 TF on a daily basis. Hell, we got to number below XOX at some point last week. Truly, this thread has become so much better ever since.
 

MykhellMikado

Alt account
Banned
Jan 13, 2020
823
well to be fair that demo was made for the ssd, and sod2 is just from raw speed and not using the new i/o fully. a patched version of sod2 would theoretically load far faster than the un-patched one. Also that demo is just quickly loading in a world, not a fully realized/published title running in a cross-gen environment. It is not an accurate thing to compare these two pieces of software at all.

the Spider-Man demo is impressive because of the seek times. Yes the raw bandwidth is important but unless you think they remade the game from the ground up to be linear, it's is raw seek times in an open world gam on display.

That was the take away people should have left with.
 
Nov 2, 2017
2,275
Last edited:

N.Domixis

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
9,208
User Banned (1 day): Metacommentary; accumulated infractions
Nothing of value was lost. All we lost are people who refused to acknowledge hat Github is completely wrong. I mean, look at Xbox, nothing of it was true yet they somehow thought it's still spot on for PS5. All they did was project their console bias. I'm glad these people are gone. Finally we can have a civilized discussion and not have that pendulum swing from 7 to 13 TF on a daily basis. Hell, we got to number below XOX at some point last week. Truly, this thread has become so much better ever since.
I agree, this thread is much much better now.
 

patapon

Banned
Dec 7, 2017
3,614
User warned: Metacommentary
Nothing of value was lost. All we lost are people who refused to acknowledge hat Github is completely wrong. I mean, look at Xbox, nothing of it was true yet they somehow thought it's still spot on for PS5. All they did was project their console bias. I'm glad these people are gone. Finally we can have a civilized discussion and not have that pendulum swing from 7 to 13 TF on a daily basis. Hell, we got to number below XOX at some point last week. Truly, this thread has become so much better ever since.

Thank you.
 

gundamkyoukai

Member
Oct 25, 2017
21,105
It's probably a lucky guess. It would be different if he had said anything about the difference in memmory bandwidth. That would be unusual and all the sofa engineers posing as specialists would have laughed at.

He gave some other info about the difference between the system but there were not as precise .
Like saying PS5 SSD is twice as fast so we will see what happens.
 

Doctor Avatar

Member
Jan 10, 2019
2,594
"He was right about the Series X specs so he must be right about the PS5 specs he mentioned"

That's not how this works.

So you think if someone claims to know the PS5 and XSX specs, and proves to be completely and utterly spot on about XSX it doesn't increase the likelihood the PS5 specs are also accurate?
 
Jan 20, 2019
10,681
User warned: Metacommentary
Nothing of value was lost. All we lost are people who refused to acknowledge hat Github is completely wrong. I mean, look at Xbox, nothing of it was true yet they somehow thought it's still spot on for PS5. All they did was project their console bias. I'm glad these people are gone. Finally we can have a civilized discussion and not have that pendulum swing from 7 to 13 TF on a daily basis. Hell, we got to number below XOX at some point last week. Truly, this thread has become so much better ever since.

Yap.

Coulnt agree more.
 

Deleted member 45460

User requested account closure
Banned
Jun 27, 2018
1,492
User banned (3 days): Trolling over a series of posts.
So the PS5 has a lower BoM but is also more powerful in the GPU and has a better SSD, and somehow keeps that all cool in a slimmer form factor with higher cooling cost? (while still being a cheaper BoM through every party of it being better) Sounds great!
 

dobahking91

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,591
He gave some other info about the difference between the system but there were not as precise .
Like saying PS5 SSD is twice as fast so we will see what happens.

He said this...we shall see lol

GPU: PS5>SeX ~10%
RayTracing Accelerators: PS5>X1 (PS5's RT works by using acceleration structures and algorithms much like nVidia's RTX cores)
CPU: Sex>PS5 ~ 6%
Memory: PS5>Sex for the size and bandwidth
SSD: PS5>Sex ~ Over twice as fast (this is the biggest and most noticable difference)
 

modiz

Member
Oct 8, 2018
17,831
dont get your hopes too high up for tommy fisher, i still dont completely trust him, its clear he knew the xbox specifications no doubt in my mind, but he got quite a few details on PS5/sony wrong so far (playstation meeting in february, sony having already acquired remedy). Keep that rumor in the back of your head but just remember that a lot can still happen, i really want to believe 13.3TF, just make sure to not be disappointed if it turns out to be less.
 

darkside

Member
Oct 26, 2017
11,265
So the PS5 has a lower BoM but is also more powerful in the GPU and has a better SSD, and somehow keeps that all cool in a slimmer form factor with higher cooling cost? (while still being a cheaper BoM through every party of it being better) Sounds great!

I mean... isn't that exactly how the PS4 played out?

dont get your hopes too high up for tommy fisher, i still dont completely trust him, its clear he knew the xbox specifications no doubt in my mind, but he got quite a few details on PS5/sony wrong so far (playstation meeting in february, sony having already acquired remedy). Keep that rumor in the back of your head but just remember that a lot can still happen, i really want to believe 13.3TF, just make sure to not be disappointed if it turns out to be less.

Folks seem to be attaching themselves to that one specific old reddit post that got like -every- studio acquisition wrong so who knows.

It's best to wait. A while.
 

Pryme

Member
Aug 23, 2018
8,164
So you think if someone claims to know the PS5 and XSX specs, and proves to be completely and utterly spot on about XSX it doesn't increase the likelihood the PS5 specs are also accurate?

Of course it does. Still worth acknowledging that there are no guarantees that it's factual info

I prefer to deal with data points, and I agree that most of the available data points to performance numbers exceeding the GitHub rumors.
 
Nov 2, 2017
2,275
Probably. Screen-space means no rays from non-visible surfaces, even if the objects that contain those non-visible surfaces are in-frame.
Ah, thanks for the clarification, yea i guess i misunderstood and thought it was supposed to be RT and got confused by the mention of screen space, that explains it.
They mention raytracing so It's confusing which is probably the intention. Raytracing is the new buzzword after all.

Maybe they used raytracing to get a more accurate rasterized end result? It's not the first time devs have been very vague about this. I think it was the Gears 5 devs as well who mentioned they were using "raytraced" shadows when the game launched.
 

Jayembi

Member
Jun 19, 2019
283
User warned: Metacommentary
Nothing of value was lost. All we lost are people who refused to acknowledge hat Github is completely wrong. I mean, look at Xbox, nothing of it was true yet they somehow thought it's still spot on for PS5. All they did was project their console bias. I'm glad these people are gone. Finally we can have a civilized discussion and not have that pendulum swing from 7 to 13 TF on a daily basis. Hell, we got to number below XOX at some point last week. Truly, this thread has become so much better ever since.

+1
 

dobahking91

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,591
Yeah I think we should keep expectations in check and honestly anything above 10 TF is great heck even 9.

Tommy nailing XSX specs doesn"t confirm everything he said (yet) .
 

Radium217

Banned
Oct 31, 2019
1,833
User warned: Trolling
Cerny playing with us, bout to drop that 13 tf deal on us real good. I think the only thing that would make me consider X is the combination of an insane lineup and a single digit Sony Pony. The X reveal didn't wow me at all and I'm not sure why. Maybe it's cause I have no baseline to compare it to rn. Like yeah it's powerful... But what is power.
 

gundamkyoukai

Member
Oct 25, 2017
21,105
So the PS5 has a lower BoM but is also more powerful in the GPU and has a better SSD, and somehow keeps that all cool in a slimmer form factor with higher cooling cost? (while still being a cheaper BoM through every party of it being better) Sounds great!

We don't know the PS5 BOM number .
Zhuge said he hear they close but the range he gave was big.
Also if we go by there SSD patent them having better SSD was not only about speed but also keeping the price down .
We also don't know the form factor .
 

Simon-chan

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,044
Italy
Guys, Tommy Fisher also said that Sony acquired Remedy and that Microsoft acquired Techland.
And this was two months ago.
As far as we know it's not true (Remedy is a public company).
Plus, Klee said that he was full of crap, so you can either believe one or the other, but not both.
Sadly I can't search for that specific post because he's banned, so don't ask me to find it.
But I'm positive it happened.
 

Expy

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,861
dont get your hopes too high up for tommy fisher, i still dont completely trust him, its clear he knew the xbox specifications no doubt in my mind, but he got quite a few details on PS5/sony wrong so far (playstation meeting in february, sony having already acquired remedy). Keep that rumor in the back of your head but just remember that a lot can still happen, i really want to believe 13.3TF, just make sure to not be disappointed if it turns out to be less.
Just gotta go with what we've heard the most... (from journalists, past and present, who we know their real identities and names)

  • They're both extremely close, almost twins (Klee, Schreier, Matt)
  • Both targeting over Stadia TF (10.7) (Schreier)
  • Devs knew about 12TF Xbox before E3 last year
  • Reiner's source had PS5 more powerful at E3
  • Jason Schreier said they're around RTX 2080 performance
  • Klee's source had PS5 more powerful, and that didn't change after the reveal of XSX
  • Another named journalist also heard PS5 was more powerful (easy to find this guy, just banned from discussion here)
Way too much smoke leading to the same fire here. Whether it's 12, 12.4, or 13.3TF, PS5 is going to be a beastly machine.
 

Elios83

Member
Oct 28, 2017
976
Nothing of value was lost. All we lost are people who refused to acknowledge hat Github is completely wrong. I mean, look at Xbox, nothing of it was true yet they somehow thought it's still spot on for PS5. All they did was project their console bias. I'm glad these people are gone. Finally we can have a civilized discussion and not have that pendulum swing from 7 to 13 TF on a daily basis. Hell, we got to number below XOX at some point last week. Truly, this thread has become so much better ever since.

It's honestly better to have dedicated threads where people can actually speculate or talk about what they're actually interested about, the github nonsense monopolized the discussion for too long, it was just the same people wanting to believe to the 9.2 vs 12 fiction no matter what and not accepting any other possibility for console wars reasons.
First the 2019 launch and the outdated GPU design, then the no ray tracing/non amd ray tracing fiction, then the RDNA1 vs RDNA2 debacle, then the huge 400mm2 xbox die which turned out to be 360mm2 and today the icing on the cake even the CUs figure for XSX that was used as a mantra turned out to be wrong or misinterepreted.
 

Bad_Boy

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,624
So... any new news from Sony today?
Cause I see Microsoft dropping sample platters for us hungry peasants today.


Can we get a crumb Sony?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.