Oberon A0 is called Navi10 Lite. Lite just means APU. So Oberon is Navi10 which is contradiction with RDNA2.
I think it's fairly obvious to everyone now that Oberon is part of the RDNA ariel/gonzalo/flute line.
The only hope for team GitHub was that PS5 was RDNA1 based.
It isn't. So pack it up folks, Github is dead. Long live GitHub.
What inconsistencies?
The Github leak had data about BC testing (PS5). Stating a full count of CUs. A 2000 Mhz mode is documented in there as well which would make more sense for a smaller chip.
There was no info about an architecture. The architecture is a missing information and I actually don't think it would have any relevance to be in there, just like the info about RT and VRS because BC was tested and not something else.
That chip being RDNA 2 makes actually more sense as those 2000 Mhz are easier to achieve by it.
Edit:
That silicon is semi custom anyway, so it is actually something different than pure RDNA 2 would be.
Cling to your GitHub all you want, you still haven't answered my questions. So I'll ask them again.
Why did Sony develop a RDNA1 line of chips in gonzalo/flute/ariel if PS5 is RDNA2 based?
Why do you assume Oberon is not part of this RDNA1 line, despite so many similarities and literally no confirmation of a single RDNA2 feature?
Why is Sony's RDNA2 development so far ahead of MS's since Oberon was far and away more developed than Arden at the same point in time when they're using the same tech from the same company? Logically if they were both using RDNA2 and releasing at the same time they would be in very similar states of development. They weren't. Almost as if Oberon was a RDNA1 based evolution of ariel/flute/gonzalo...
Data is useful Colbert, but you also have to interpret it properly and look at it critically. GitHub's Oberon as final PS5 silicon hasn't made sense for a variety of reasons for some time. As time goes on it makes less and less sense. In fact the truth is that anyone claiming it is either RDNA2 or final PS5 silicon are basing those claims on precisely nothing. So if you're as data driven as you claim you should be very open to the likelihood that Oberon isn't RDNA 2, which all evidence points to, which means it isn't PS5's final APU.
www.resetera.com
