And the fact that you can pair your Bluetooth headphones without needing a dongle makes it perfect for portability.
Joy-Con drift is a huge detractor in my eyes. My playtime on Switch now exceeds my playtime on Vita (which was already a large amount), but it's pretty much always been spent in docked mode due to how badly the sticks degrade over time. I was very much so ready to use my Switch in a similar manner to the Vita or 3DS, but it really isn't feasible unless you want to be constantly maintaining your Joy-Cons.I honestly don't see how any can prefer it to the Switch. The Switch has big boy third parties (Bethsada, CD Projekt, SNK, Square Enix). It's not perfect obviously. Missing EA and others. But then you add Nintendo's first-party and a very healthy indie scene. It has 4 shoulder buttons, bigger screens, and so on.
Yeah, this is kind of where I'm at. I loved my Vita and I spent a lot of time with it, but a lot of my time was spent with games that were essentially either ports, indies or PS1 and PSP games. There were good original titles in the native Vita library like Freedom Wars, Soul Sacrifice Delta and Gravity Rush, but the dearth of original games runs dry pretty quick if that's what you're looking for and you already happened to own a PSP in the past (which I didn't). In hindsight, it was really great at introducing me to things I never had an interest in before like Shin Megami Tensei, Ninja Gaiden, Binding of Isaac, Geometry Wars and Earth Defense Force more than anything else.It is exaggerated, but so is the post you responded too. Saying 1600 games as if they're all 100% quality titles, is disingenuous at best. The issue with the Vita is that it doesn't have the quality of library that Nintendo Switch has (or the 3DS for that matter), so it's not going to appeal to a wide audience. In fact, a lot of the Vita releases in recent years before discontinuation were either indies, anime games, or ports.
It is exaggerated, but so is the post you responded too. Saying 1600 games as if they're all 100% quality titles, is disingenuous at best. The issue with the Vita is that it doesn't have the quality of library that Nintendo Switch has (or the 3DS for that matter), so it's not going to appeal to a wide audience. In fact, a lot of the Vita releases in recent years before discontinuation were either indies, anime games, or ports.
I love my vita but even I admit that I wish it had better ergonomics or that Sony had better quality games for it.
Yeah, this is kind of where I'm at. I loved my Vita and I spent a lot of time with it, but a lot of my time was spent with games that were essentially either ports, indies or PS1 and PSP games. There were good original titles in the native Vita library like Freedom Wars, Soul Sacrifice Delta and Gravity Rush, but the dearth of original games runs dry pretty quick if that's what you're looking for and you already happened to own a PSP in the past (which I didn't). In hindsight, it was really great at introducing me to things I never had an interest in before like Shin Megami Tensei, Ninja Gaiden, Binding of Isaac, Geometry Wars and Earth Defense Force more than anything else.
I'd enjoy my launch Vita more if my 32GB would stop getting corrupted every other game. Currently collecting dust because of that annoyance.
I have the 1000 and and a first generation Switch with one of those Japan Display panels to compare and they aren't even in the same stratosphere.
"Dat OLED" was better than what the 3DS' came with, but it wasn't even all that great compared to LCDs from 2012 and it's straight trash compared to modern displays like in the Switch. The insane Mura effect by itself should disqualify the screen from being considered good.
I'm looking for a Vita right now on ebay because of this and another thread. Do I go OLED or slim? I found an OLED model in a blue shell that I really like but I'm concerned about it being a time bomb. Thoughts?
Depends on the price I would say just get it, you can always get a 2000 version for back up later :P.
But I didn't say that. It's Disingenuous to say I did. I am sure no console has 100 percent awesome library, but we are talking about many of the hits from literally three different consoles that you can play natively. That is not a small amount. Again there are more games I wish I could carry around that could fit on the largest memory card I got for Vita. There must be alot of hate or apathy for many genre's or PSP/PS1 game if you are going to portray the Vita as a device that wasn't worth it.
I honestly don't think it would have made a difference. The software killed it among the casual crowd, plain and simple. It could have had cheap memory cards, L2/R2, etc, and we would have loved it, but the casual buyer(and more importantly, kids) would have still completely ignored it.It's a great console. But the lack of proper L2 and R2 is one of the reason it died.
Nothing will match the first time I saw that beautiful OLED screen, I still play it 8 years after buying it at launch.
Outside of resolution, you are damn sure that Oled screen is better.
The only area where the display is better is in contrast, because that's what OLED screens are inherently better at. And even then the screen has terrible Mura splotches.Nah have both too, the OLED is much more vibrant. "not in the same stratosphere"..haha.
I tried the Tearaway today and OMG is way different than the PS4 version. I really love how the game uses the PS Vita features (also I got surprised when the frontal camera turned on lol). I agree with people complaining about the Memory Card, and some button (specially the L1 and R1) but even with all those mistakes I think it's incredible what the PS Vita offers. I wish lot of the features were available on the Switch, which is the "PS VITA 2" and my main handheld console.
It is! Get Muramasa Rebirth & Odin Sphere as well!
The whitelist was the most baffling thing. So many games weren't playable for absolutely no good reason. Hacking it out has been great.I own 2. The original OLED unit and the Slim. I just wish it got more support. Even the issues with the whitelist is just bizarre.
I didn't say you did. I said the other person did. It's why I worded the sentence as:
"It is exaggerated, but so is the post you responded too. Saying 1600 games as if they're all 100% quality titles, is disingenuous at best. "
I made an error where I meant "to" rather than "too"
Also, I don't really understand why you assume I have hate or apathy for many genres or PSP/PS1 games. I even explained that the Vita has issues where the genres of late games may not appeal to everyone. With the latter, you could get high quality emulation devices that can play PSP games at higher resolution (admittedly, it looks like garbage on the Vita screen), with the former, you run into issues where people don't really care as much about the library when compared to other handhelds (or even consoles for that matter).