The only reason anyone is going to watch that video is to hate him that bit more.
I'm tempted, to be honest.
I'm tempted, to be honest.
This is terrible and you should be ashamed for making me laugh like I did
Yeah, I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean either. Should he have left it completely blank for dramatic purposes?I'm skeptical, but watching the video.
Also, what does this mean? No logic behind why this description should make anyone distrust its creator, when explicitly clickbait videos are posted on youtube, everyday. That's a clear form of psychological manipulation, not this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief_bias
When people are heavily under the radar, especially underage allegations, people accused will want to take as much time as possible to perfect their words and make sure their words cant be misinterpreted.
lmao
First of all, none of this is true, it's all lies and people want to put him down. <-- His words
-He does show some evidence and screenshots of the 2 people who claimed he'd encourage them to send nudes whilst underaged.
-Then he says he doesn't remember showing Pamela Horton's nudes and he feels that isn't something he would do(he backs this up by saying his friends agree with him)
- He claims he didn't cheat on Heidi because he got texts that prove it(can't show it because of legal reasons).
- He ends the video by saying he wishes that people would stop harrassing him. Then he says Heidi, Holly, Chai and Charlie.
- He won't be going anywhere. He will continue to be making videos like normal.
So I've only watched 15 minutes so far, but this isn't a typical Youtuber apology video. He does apologize, but also goes into a lot of detail into the allegations. So far just one, with one of the persons claiming he encouraged them to send nudes while underage. He shows, via Medium posts of that person, that the same person claimed to suffer from memory loss in the exact 6 months this supposedly happened in due to a brain injury.
So far, it seems to be worth watching, if only to form your own opinion. It's not some empty "woe is me"-bullshit, at least so far.
We can discuss abusers and what they've done and how we should try and combat them, without bringing up videos that will give him more views and potentially lead people to him. I don't have to even watch the video to know this is just 40+ minutes of bullshit and damage control.On the one hand, I agree. On the other, his manipulations shouldn't fade away.
He's obviously delusional enough to try.He's trying to discredit the accusers the majority of the video. What a piece of work. I seriously do not understand why he just didn't quit and get a job away from the internet. He can't seriously think he'll ever live any of this down can he?
Yep, I have the same feelings as you.
I feel like he was wrong on many things but maybe the underage matter was blown out of proportion.
Maybe I'm wrong too... I don't know. I want to ear some other peoples opinions on the matter in case I missed something and I missed some BS.
He's obviously delusional enough to try.
And I'm curious where he recorded this video. Some undisclosed bunker in Aladdin, Wyoming?
Wow, thanks for bringing that to my attention, is it just accusations or is there proof?
10-4
Having watched almost all of the video.
He does seem to have proof about the pedo accusations. But then the stuff that comes after he has no proof(Pamela Horton accusations), which he accuses Charlie and Chai for...
We have all been lied to, in our own very special ways
Dude needed to quietly disappear from the Internet and deal with this stuff off-camera. Coming back this late and deciding to fight it by saying we've all been lied to is... maybe the worst possible optics imaginable.
We aren't taking him to court, it's just people not wanting him to be making videos and having an opportunity to abuse his power some more by asking fans for nudes and shit.Why is it him that needs proof though? Should it not be innocent until proven guilty?
I meant victims and camera proof, sorry for a vague question, I will look into his previous behaviour.I didn't notice this until y'all pointed it out in this thread and I love that even more.
Dunno what the standard of "proof" you have here is but there are plenty of corroborating accounts of Alec Holowka's behavior, at least.
Why is it him that needs proof though? Should it not be innocent until proven guilty?
Wouldn't click on it anyway even if you paid me but especially with that nanafactured thumbnail.
He can fuck right off especially with news hitting today.
The only reason anyone is going to watch that video is to hate him that bit more.
I'm tempted, to be honest.
I watched the first half. I don't really know the full story about him, but everything he said seemed like a fair defense to me.Anybody have a strong enough stomach to try to check out those receipts? I might if I wasn't at work.
Ah no we dont have to listen to a damn thingPeople should still be willing to listen to what he has to say even if by the end the outcome of what you think about the person is still the same. Watch it on a mirror site where he doesn't get any clicks/views if you have to, but if you are so willing to condemn someone for life because of tweets/images, you should at least be willing to spare even 10 minutes of the video to see their defence to serious accusations. I know that requires some effort compared to calling someone FUCKING SCUM on a forum but hey ho.
Can someone please upload this somewhere else so I can watch it for entertainment value, while not contributing my click to him cause he's shit?
They were apparently working together to make jared look bad, one wrote an article about how they were in the hospital for a brain injury during the time frame in which she sexted jared and the other accuser was sending porn to game grumps and begging for pay pal donations while also running a gg porn blog, and jared has the chats that showed they never sent pics to eacherother.
People should still be willing to listen to what he has to say even if by the end the outcome of what you think about the person is still the same. Watch it on a mirror site where he doesn't get any clicks/views if you have to, but if you are so willing to condemn someone for life because of tweets/images, you should at least be willing to spare even 10 minutes of the video to see their defence to serious accusations. I know that requires some effort compared to calling someone FUCKING SCUM on a forum but hey ho.