-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
[Poll] Do you think the Switch successor will be backwards compatible?
- Thread starter lunanto
- Start date
Yea, the next Nintendo device should still be like the Switch. The whole concept of a home console you can take with you / a portable you can hook up to your TV is good. I reckon they should stick with it.
I definitely think so. The real question is are they gonna put in effort/try and get the devs to upgrade the games on Switch on the successor? I like my Switch but some games being 30 fps or some ps4/xone games that were downported and don't exactly look the greatest could definitely benefit from stuff like that.
I think it will at the very least with digital, possibly physical too if they use cards with a similar physical size or include a new and old card slot.
Seems they only don't have it when logistical reasons prevent it happening.
Gameboy
Gameboy Colour - BC
Gameboy Advance - BC
DS - BC
3DS - BC
Gamecube
Wii - BC
Wii U - BC
Switch - Didn't use disks or have two screen.
PS4 and XBO also weren't BC(the latter at first) but both of their successors are.
for sure.
despite what some people think nintendo has a very solid track record in backward compatibility (when it's possible), and since next gen will most likely just use a more powerful chip from nvidia and the physical media doesn't need to change (just support bigger sizes), there's no reason to not have full digital and physical BC.
despite what some people think nintendo has a very solid track record in backward compatibility (when it's possible), and since next gen will most likely just use a more powerful chip from nvidia and the physical media doesn't need to change (just support bigger sizes), there's no reason to not have full digital and physical BC.
So why do you think Nintendo wouldn't be BC considering they have a long history of it?
The Switch, XBO and PS4 all lacked PS4 for the same reason; they changed architecture. The plan going forward for all three is to stick to their current ones.
but they've done it with GBA, DS, 3DS, Wii and Wii U?
it's pretty obvious why switch doesn't have BC with past systems, as it's not possible (different architecture, different physical media, different form factor)
It would make Sony and Microsoft money to deny it to. Sony sold more copies of The Last of Us Remastered than they did the original release after all.
By this logic no system ever has offered backwards compatibility and they just resell all their titles forever. Because money.
I really hope so. Otherwise I'm going to feel extremely burned. I have a really extensive switch physical library at this point and plenty of digital buys too
Pretty sure they want their +100m Switch owners upgrade to the next system when it's out.
Why are you bringing up Sony or Microsoft? What do they have to do with it?
Because it's not a situation that is unique to Nintendo and going along the same lines Nintendo followed Sony/MS in making Switch region free despite the fact that they made money on people buying multiple 3DSs/Wii Us to play across regions.
100%. Every one of Nintendo's handheld successors have been backwards compatible to some degree; there is a 0% chance Nintendo changes course with the successor to one of their most popular systems ever and their only active platform
With my massive backlog, I really hope so.
DS + 3DS and Wii + Wii U tho.
It literally is though. Switch is the only Nintendo console in the 21st century not to be fully backwards compatible.
EDIT: Actually realised I mixed that up. Gamecube could be played on Wii but it wasn't BC itself.
Last edited:
Who knows if it's still their plan, but the whole idea of Switch was to have a unified operating system and development environment between devices that Nintendo could use for multiple generations without breaking compatibility.
So I'm fairly optimistic that their next system will be backwards compatible.
I mean, Nintendo has supported backwards compatibility with every one of their previous handhelds and Wii could play GameCube games and Wii U could play Wii games.
So I'm fairly optimistic that their next system will be backwards compatible.
I mean, Nintendo has supported backwards compatibility with every one of their previous handhelds and Wii could play GameCube games and Wii U could play Wii games.
Well, there is no TECHNICAL reason. :)
There may be other commercial strategies behind these kind of choices.
I'm still angry at Microsoft for not having X360 accessories such as Arcade Sticks compatible with Xbox One.
Last edited:
You gotta think bigger than that!
Assuming Nintendo continues NSO now that they have finally established an actual online service, the Switch successor could potentially have
NES (NSO)
SNES (NSO)
GameBoy Color/Advance (rumored to join NSO this fall)
N64 (NSO or eShop)
GameCube (traditional BC via remasters)
Wii (traditional BC via remasters)
Wii U (traditional BC via remasters)
Switch (traditional BC)
Also worth taking into consideration that the Wii U was able to play DS games via the eShop, so there's not really any reason for Switch to not eventually get those too via NSO or eShop.
I have no idea what kind of technical issues there are with emulating 3DS, but if they can't emulate those games and instead port some of them, it's entirely possible that the next Switch would be able to play games from every past Nintendo system. O:
I don't think so.
Or, not in the sense of games you already own being able to be played on new hardware. I suspect they will offer some sort of "virtual console" service where you can pay again for games you already own, so on that sense yes.
But will you be able to say...verify you own a game and play without additional fees on the new hardware like you can on Microsoft consoles? I don't think so.
Or, not in the sense of games you already own being able to be played on new hardware. I suspect they will offer some sort of "virtual console" service where you can pay again for games you already own, so on that sense yes.
But will you be able to say...verify you own a game and play without additional fees on the new hardware like you can on Microsoft consoles? I don't think so.
Outside of the Switch, it's been true for their consoles since 2006.
So many people saying it won't because "it's Nintendo" even though Switch is the first console they've released that has no backwards compatibility since the GameCube and the first handheld to not have backwards compatibility since the original GameBoy, which literally had nothing to be backwards compatible with.
Y'all are weird.
Y'all are weird.