• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Deleted member 23850

Oct 28, 2017
8,689

Editor's Note (12/12/19): After this story was published, the author of the study it was based on retracted his paper because of classification errors in the data. Once such errors were initially discovered, the study's author conducted a thorough examination of a larger sample of cases and found additional classification errors. When the data were reanalyzed, the findings did not replicate the original results. The author apologizes that these errors were not caught before the paper's publication.

Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice—these are just a few of the unarmed African Americans killed by police officers in the past few years. Such incidents not only cause incalculable suffering in affected families but also have long-term impacts on communities' overall well-being. Now a new study finds that such events are associated with negative health outcomes among unborn black infants.

Sociologist Joscha Legewie of Harvard University analyzed the birth records of nearly four million babies born in California in recent years and found that black infants born near police killings of unarmed black individuals were more likely to be born prematurely and have a lower birth weight. He did not find a similar correlation among white or Hispanic infants or black infants exposed to killings of armed black people or of those of other races. Maternal stress related to killings perceived as unjust or discriminatory may be contributing to the observed health impacts on black infants, Legewie says. Studies suggest preterm birth and low birth weight can negatively affect cognitive development, linking them with lower test scores and greater rates of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The findings were published Wednesday in Science Advances.

Police kill about 1,000 people in the U.S. every year, and a disproportionate number of them are minorities. Black individuals are killed at nearly three times the rate of white ones. Officers' use of deadly force is often controversial, but when the person killed is unarmed, the impacts on communities can be especially devastating, prompting surges of collective grief, anger and fear.

Legewie hypothesized that the stress experienced by pregnant black women living in close proximity to police killings of unarmed black individuals could be contributing to poor birth outcomes. To investigate that potential effect, he examined data on all births in California between 2007 and 2016, including information about race and ethnicity, birth weight, gestational age, home location and other factors. Then he combined this information with data on police killings in California between 2005 and 2017, which included the date and location of the events, the races of the people killed, and whether or not they were armed. Legewie analyzed the impact of proximity to a police killing (in kilometers)—at time intervals before and after the event, as well as during all three trimesters of pregnancy—on birth weight and gestational age (a measure of premature birth). He examined killings of black, white and Hispanic people, as well as the health of infants of corresponding races.

Based on his results, Legewie concludes that only killings of unarmed black individuals were significantly associated with the health of black infants. Although the exact mechanism is not known, he speculates that maternal stress from the killings may trigger cells in the placenta and fetal membranes to produce corticotropin-releasing hormone—which is known to cause premature birth and low birth weight.

To exclude other factors that could explain a link between police killings and poor birth outcomes, Legewie conducted several analyses. First, he used something called a "difference in difference" approach, comparing black infants born in areas exposed to the killings (before and after the events) with infants in demographically similar areas that had no reported killings. He then used another method to compare the health of siblings who were or were not exposed to a police killing while in the womb to reduce possible factors related to the mother. Finally, he compared the correlation of police killings of people in different racial and ethnic groups to the health of infants of those groups to show that the situation was specific to black infants exposed to killings of unarmed black individuals.

Thought this was an interesting article. Having said that, the editor's note...what happened here exactly? I'm not a research scientist nor do I possess great analytical/research methods, so an explanation would be great.
 

Jam

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,050
If the data was in error and reanalysing led to different results then why isn't the published paper pulled as opposed to left up with an editor's note?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.