• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

SilentPanda

Member
Nov 6, 2017
13,721
Earth
Polish government officials have denounced the deactivation of Donald Trump's social media accounts, and said a draft law being readied in Poland will make it illegal for tech companies to take similar actions there.

"Algorithms or the owners of corporate giants should not decide which views are right and which are not," wrote the prime minister, Mateusz Morawiecki, on Facebook earlier this week, without directly mentioning Trump. "There can be no consent to censorship."

Morawiecki indirectly compared social media companies taking decisions to remove accounts with Poland's experience during the communist era.

"Censorship of free speech, which is the domain of totalitarian and authoritarian regimes, is now returning in the form of a new, commercial mechanism to combat those who think differently," he wrote.

Poland's ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party, which is ideologically aligned with Trump on many issues, has itself been accused of trying to limit freedom of speech in recent years.

Some of its members have made a habit of posting anti-LGBT or anti-refugee rhetoric. However, government officials have long claimed that people with rightwing views in Poland and abroad have been the victims of biased decisions by international tech companies.

Morawiecki called on the EU to introduce similar regulations. Other European politicians, including Germany's Angela Merkel, have also expressed unease at the ban on Trump by various social media outlets, and a new EU proposal, the Digital Services Act, envisions tougher regulations on tech companies, including tough fines for failure to block illegal content.


www.theguardian.com

Poland plans to make censoring of social media accounts illegal

Following Trump’s Twitter ban, Polish government wants to protect posts that do not violate nation’s laws
 

Brat-Sampson

Member
Nov 16, 2017
3,465
Morawiecki called on the EU to introduce similar regulations. Other European politicians, including Germany's Angela Merkel, have also expressed unease at the ban on Trump by various social media outlets, and a new EU proposal, the Digital Services Act, envisions tougher regulations on tech companies, including tough fines for failure to block illegal content.

"We must be allowed to post anything!"

ALSO

"You must control what people post!"

EDIT: Apologies, meant to edit this into my original post. Never mind.
 

Deleted member 82064

User requested account closure
Banned
Sep 29, 2020
596
Only thing I agree is the part about EU law where hate speech must become illegal. Twitter/Facebook/etc. should just leave Poland.
 

Joni

Member
Oct 27, 2017
19,508
Hate-speechers gonna hate-speech. Not sure how they can make ToSs illegal though...
That one is really ease. Huge parts of TOS are invalid in the EU, although it is usually the parts that are bad for consumers.

"We must be allowed to post anything!"

ALSO

"You must control what people post!"

EDIT: Apologies, meant to edit this into my original post. Never mind.
The EU proposal simply moves the decision on "what to block" from companies to the law.
 
Oct 27, 2017
1,147
Finland
So how do they think this will work? Like, should no service be able to ban any individual in their opinion regardless of what they do? Should services be able to have any terms and conditions at all?
 

Kwigo

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
8,036
"Biggoted government wants to continue to spread its bigotted opinions"
Seems about right.
 

Ketch

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,291
how do they stop social media companies from just not offering services in their country? or maybe that's the plan...
 

Deleted member 44129

User requested account closure
Banned
May 29, 2018
7,690

EloKa

GSP
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
1,906
Far-right wing politicans are against censoring of far-right wing views. Who would have thought.
 

SasaBassa

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,076
"Your private company better allow me to spread my bigotry because I'm in Parliament" essentially.

I wonder what year humanity would've been truly ready for the internet.
 

Potterson

Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,414
LMAO if they manage to pull of anything in regards to people getting banned and they will try to fine Facebook (lol) or something, then the social media platform will probably deactivate in Poland for the time of the law conflict - and that would be a beautiful disaster :D
 

Koklusz

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,565
Twitter/Facebook/etc. should just leave Poland.
Right wing parties around the world have weaponized social media to spread their agenda. Without Twitter/Facebook/etc. PiS has only state media, watched mainly by older folks, as the only channel to distribute their propaganda, so yeah, not gonna happen. Besides, I'm sure tech giants are more than happy to have a law that takes them of the hook of responsibility.
 

Mesoian

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 28, 2017
26,508
So Poland is planning to ban these mediums then? Make their own? Be on the hook for a whole host of nefarious postings without moderation?

Not likely.
 

Idde

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,665
Already mentioned in the OP, but given how the EU seems to be looking at ways to curb the spreading of misinformation through social media, Poland going in this direction could cause even more friction than there already is.
 

Galkinator

Chicken Chaser
Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,959
When will these right wing nutjobs realize getting banned from your platform is not censorship?
Jesus that's so goddamn stupid
 

MrCibb

Member
Dec 12, 2018
5,349
UK
There's a big difference between censoring someone and someone breaking the TOS they agreed to when signing up and getting their dumbass banned for it. These people don't get it.
 
Oct 27, 2017
2,902
Scotland
Right wing parties around the world have weaponized social media to spread their agenda. Without Twitter/Facebook/etc. PiS has only state media, watched mainly by older folks, as the only channel to distribute their propaganda, so yeah, not gonna happen. Besides, I'm sure tech giants are more than happy to have a law that takes them of the hook of responsibility.

Yeah definitely. Social Media has been successfully used by right-wing parties to spread their hate and the results paid off in the mid-2010s. Right-wing parties were not only a joke but remarkably small prior to that with only a tiny group of (mostly elderly) people supporting and spewing the nonsense. The types of people you'd physically distance yourself from if you happen to be in conversation with them in real life. With social media, that faux pas experience/feeling was removed and the bullshit content became as easily available/acceptable as a menu from a takeaway.
 
Last edited:

Dis

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,950
It's pretty fucking annoying that this is what governments are focusing on in terms of service from companies now instead of focusing on making more of the bullshit in ToS illegal in their countries. Right wing fucks have used social media for their gain so much that they hate the idea of it being taken from them finally. Poland has really made a lot of shit decisions over the years and the streak continues it seems.

As for people in here asking how they can make ToS illegal, easily, there are huge amounts of ToS that these companies have that would be illegal in other places outside the USA. Just because you agree to a ToS doesn't mean they can legally hold you to illegal terms. The way it works right now is that a lot of the shit in the ToS may not apply to the EU while they do apply to the USA etc. Also there are a bunch of stuff in ToS that probably would warrant a lawsuit in other countries to decide if they are are legal right now but they haven't yet been tested as such.

Look at how valve had no refund policy at all, including in countries where one had to exist, Australian courts ruled valves terms were illegal after years of it being that way and they were forced to change how they handled stuff there. It's the same elsewhere.
 

Lurcharound

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,068
UK
True motives are pretty transparent here. They just want to have control in their direct hands. Also of course he wasn't actually censored.

Hopefully this doesn't confuse correct need for independant laws and arbritation with concerns on direct government control: the latter is undesirable but the former very much so.
 

Iztok

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,138
Hate-speechers gonna hate-speech. Not sure how they can make ToSs illegal though...

TOS aren't legal as it is, if they contradict (EU) law.
Which most US TOS do, making them void everywhere on the continent.

They can't outlaw private companies moderating their private platforms, however.
This is just posturing for their voterbase.