The suicide squad better watch their backs. I've read the badass brigade is nipping at their heelsWarren really played some amazing jiu-jitsu here, praising AOC and trying to get her endorsement, using reverse psychology to drive her into the arms of B*rn*rd S*nd*rs to avoid being tagged with the political stench of the Socialist Suicide Squad.
The suicide squad better watch their backs. I've read the badass brigade is nipping at their heels
Talk
People are allowed to have their reasons for not preferring Sanders you know. He and Warren may share a lot of beliefs, but there's a huge gulf between them in other aspects that make people not like him. And that's ok.
Warren really played some amazing jiu-jitsu here, praising AOC and trying to get her endorsement, using reverse psychology to drive her into the arms of B*rn*rd S*nd*rs to avoid being tagged with the political stench of the Socialist Suicide Squad.
THE FIRST THING I SAID IN MY POST WAS THAT IT WAS TOTALLY FINE TO PREFER WARREN. My point, which I think is valid, is that "not giving a fuck" is a strange, if unsupported , criticism.
Stubborn.
Old and out of touch.
Not perfect on guns.
Too far left.
Not the sharpest
Etc.
Sure
I thought stubbornest was something the left loved about him? I don't see how those aren't valid complaints, Bernie isn't a saint with no flaws.
All those things he listed he's saying are valid complaints compared to "not giving a fuck" about black people.
That's no social ju-jitsu, that's what supporting someone honestly while not in their faction looks like. AOC is liked by people who aren't leftists. How's the divide and conquer strategy working for you so far?
damn. I just am not feeling Bernie. I don't see it. dude just feels too out of touch and as a black man I just don't feel like he gives a real fuck.
My vote is Elizabeth Warren all the way. so I hope she pulls it out.
Older votes go to trump. Look at the difference in turnout numbers between 2016 and 2018
AOC is basically preaching to the choir though right? It would never happen, but someone like Obama endorsing Bernie would be a much bigger deal since he has a crossover audience.
Glad to see this. Our AOC cult gathering is coming up. We'll get you set up with a robe and i'll pm you the details.After last night, I turned around. Warren failed on several issues, especailly on foreign policy and on explaining how to pay for healthcare.
Bernie however bluntly said straight out, you taxes will go up, you premiums will go down, you will pay less.
And Bernie's answer on Foreign Policy on the Syrian Kurds versus the Turks situation was one of the best answers on that issue.
It'll stop Sander's leftist support bleeding to Warren and might start Warren's leftist support bleeding back to Sanders.
damn. I just am not feeling Bernie. I don't see it. dude just feels too out of touch and as a black man I just don't feel like he gives a real fuck.
My vote is Elizabeth Warren all the way. so I hope she pulls it out.
Seriously lolI think bernie and AOC have a lot of crossover in supporters, so not sure how big a deal her endorsement of him is.
Genuinely curious what makes you as a black man feel Warren more, since by that statement it makes it seem that she is more in touch on racial issues. Forget their rhetoric for second, what policies make her more up your alley?
AOC is basically preaching to the choir though right? It would never happen, but someone like Obama endorsing Bernie would be a much bigger deal since he has a crossover audience.
It could just be that he feels that Warren communicates her understanding of racial issues better than Bernie. A lot of black people feel that way, regardless of policy.
Fair enough...I suppose I am not in quite the same camp as I am mixed race born in a majorly white context....but I view these things as intersectional. Racial inequality is bound up with income inequality, and climate justice, etc, etc. I also think Sander's is unfairly treated on this issue, and don't really see how Warren has been any more of a champion for minorities. In fact her indigenous gaffe was pretty bizarre given how educated she is...but everyone makes mistakes, and I don't think it was malicious at all. Ill advised
Genuinely curious what makes you as a black man feel Warren more, since by that statement it makes it seem that she is more in touch on racial issues. Forget their rhetoric for second, what policies make her more up your alley?
Alexiswrite: You have any proof for that view? Because it seems to me that Warren has for sure gained at the expense of Sanders...at least here in the UK she has gotten far more positive coverage from liberal news papers than Sanders. Most or all of which have nothing to do with her being more progressive policy wise, and mostly to do with her being more acceptable to the ideological positions of the news papers (i.e., the Guardian, Independent, New York Times, etc) She has had a massive boost from that segment of the media. While Sanders has gotten a lot of the Corbyn treatment.
Polling is what I'm using to support my point:
RealClearPolitics - Election 2020 - 2020 Democratic Presidential Nomination
RealClearPolitics - Election 2020 - 2020 Democratic Presidential Nominationwww.realclearpolitics.com
On average, Bernie is 2 percentage points from where he was at the start of the race, Biden is 1 points or so from where he was at the start of the race, but Warren has increased by like 18 points. None of her rising periods seem to coincide with a downturn for Bernie. Therefore, it doesn't seem like there's been a lot of shift from him to her.
That doesn't prove that she hasn't gained at the expense of Sanders...obviously many votes are to play for...In most cases candidates aren't looking to finish the campaign at the place they started with unless they are starting with an unassailable lead...
Interestingly, most modern polls use cell phones, but the response rate has absolutely *cratered* from around 36 percent in 1997 to like 6 percent today, thanks to both societal and technological shifts. As such, major polls are more and more unreliable. Complex mathematical models can help, but...who knows, at this point?People saying this won't make a dent in his campaign I think are missing a big part of this (or maybe it's intentional who knows).
AOC, Omar, and Talib are going to get young voters involved in numbers we haven't seen before. All these polls that rely on landlines that nobody under 50 still has I think are underestimating that demographic because historically it has been small.
I think that will change this election, and I think it starts with this primary (it can be argued it already started in the mid terms). Bernie excels among young voters. That's the play here and why it's important beyond the fact that these people are choosing to endorse the candidate that aligns closest to their positions rather than the "politically smart" move or whatever condescending shit you wanna say.
Older votes go to trump. Look at the difference in turnout numbers between 2016 and 2018
The hypothesis is that since Sanders hasn't particularly gained in the polls, nor lost substantially, and there is cross over between Warren and Sunders in terms of position (with Warren ostensibly adopting a number of positions Sanders has espoused), then she has been gaining at the expense of Sanders...it is not rocket science...They are going after many of the same voters.You need to go into more detail to explain what I'm missing here. What other hypothesis do we have evidence for which matches that graph?
The hypothesis is that since Sanders hasn't particularly gained in the polls, nor lost substantially, and there is cross over between Warren and Sunders in terms of position (with Warren ostensibly adopting a number of positions Sanders has espoused), then she has been gaining at the expense of Sanders...it is not rocket science...They are going after many of the same voters.
Obama hasn't endorsed anybody though, also hilarious how much weight people put behind their leftist waifu
But Bernie already has the young voters that believe in the too good to be true campaign promises. They should have backed Warren, this country needs a first of many women president.People saying this won't make a dent in his campaign I think are missing a big part of this (or maybe it's intentional who knows).
AOC, Omar, and Talib are going to get young voters involved in numbers we haven't seen before. All these polls that rely on landlines that nobody under 50 still has I think are underestimating that demographic because historically it has been small.
I think that will change this election, and I think it starts with this primary (it can be argued it already started in the mid terms). Bernie excels among young voters. That's the play here and why it's important beyond the fact that these people are choosing to endorse the candidate that aligns closest to their positions rather than the "politically smart" move or whatever condescending shit you wanna say.
Or it'll turn into another Bernie-or-bust movement when he eventually loses the primaries.People saying this won't make a dent in his campaign I think are missing a big part of this (or maybe it's intentional who knows).
AOC, Omar, and Talib are going to get young voters involved in numbers we haven't seen before. All these polls that rely on landlines that nobody under 50 still has I think are underestimating that demographic because historically it has been small.
I think that will change this election, and I think it starts with this primary (it can be argued it already started in the mid terms). Bernie excels among young voters. That's the play here and why it's important beyond the fact that these people are choosing to endorse the candidate that aligns closest to their positions rather than the "politically smart" move or whatever condescending shit you wanna say.
Good endorsement for Bernie, could this be enough to keep him from falling down to single digits for now?
If you think Sanders' plans are too good to be true then let me tell you about Warren's plans, because they're just as unlikely to pass. And the country does need a female President, I just don't believe that that should ever be anyone's primary criteria for deciding who to support.But Bernie already has the young voters that believe in the too good to be true campaign promises. They should have backed Warren, this country needs a first of many women president.
I honestly don't know why people keep assuming Bernie's going to get win because he's going to bring out all these hidden first time voters that the polls don't reflect, again. Didn't happen last time, no reason to believe it'll happen this time. It'd be great, but to state it as something that will happen, nah.Or it'll turn into another Bernie-or-bust movement when he eventually loses the primaries.
Since you asked I will tell you. Criminal justice reform is a real thing. Ever since she been running Senator Warren has had a real plan to deal with the real issue of criminal justice reform and racial inequality. She has a real plan to deal with both and has recognized since she been running that "economic reform" would not fix all our issues.Genuinely curious what makes you as a black man feel Warren more, since by that statement it makes it seem that she is more in touch on racial issues. Forget their rhetoric for second, what policies make her more up your alley?
Alexiswrite: You have any proof for that view? Because it seems to me that Warren has for sure gained at the expense of Sanders...at least here in the UK she has gotten far more positive coverage from liberal news papers than Sanders. Most or all of which have nothing to do with her being more progressive policy wise, and mostly to do with her being more acceptable to the ideological positions of the news papers (i.e., the Guardian, Independent, New York Times, etc) She has had a massive boost from that segment of the media. While Sanders has gotten a lot of the Corbyn treatment.
If you think Sanders' plans are too good to be true then let me tell you about Warren's plans, because they're just as unlikely to pass. And the country does need a female President, I just don't believe that that should ever be anyone's primary criteria for deciding who to support.
Not an issue in the primary.I like AOC but she is the last person you want associated with you in the swing states that are a must to win.
One can argue Sanders is better at appealing to such states and I doubt AOC would hurt him there. His issues doesn't seem to be there.
This thread is about the primary. And of course it matters
None of that has been aimed specifically at the black community. You're also ignoring his missteps with the black community. You giving him a pass there is why you dont understand.I'm not going to say Sanders is a better candidate than Warren, but if "giving a fuck is your standard" I can't remotely understand how Warren is in but Sanders is out. Dude is almost literally dying out there campaigning, been saying thr same thing for decades, and has been ostracized by the Democratic party for his whole career.
None of that has been aimed specifically at the black community. You're also ignoring his missteps with the black community. You giving him a pass there is why you dont understand.
Primaries arent held in 50 states? 50% of democrats arent moderate to conservative leaning? Ridiculous.
Actively writing off the black southern vote in 2016. Warren still has an oppurtunity to not make that mistake even though many of her supporters currently have the same "dont worry about appealing to them, black people will come along when they see they have no choice" mentality.
Eh depends on the scenario I think. If Congress is close I think Warren will be the better President on passing bills, if we have a split Congress still I think neither's passing anything of substance, if we get Supermajorities then Bernie all the way. It's not like Bernie or Warren would be writing their bills themselves so I don't concern myself with who's better on the details, though I do agree and think Warren is sharper on that front.You're right that they'll be incredibly hard, if not impossible, for Warren. However, between the two of them Warren is the one with the wonk no-how and ability to work with the Democrats to a higher degree than Bernie will in the same position.