I wish they'd at least change the colors of the western version's Pokémon logo.
The iconic Japanese Gen 3/4-era logo of the mainline games makes a return for the first time with Scarlet and Violet. Combined with the fact that Legends had a unique logo makes me think they want to make the distinction between "Pocket Monsters" and "Pokémon Legends" clear in the series branding.
They generally change up the logo with every generation, but that one and variations of it was used heavily, across 12 mainline games (including BDSP) as well as several spin-offs (Box, Pinball RS, XD, and more).
People keep saying this but Nintendo knew this was releasing this year from the beginning. It's certainly not a last minute change to accomodate a BOTW delayLooks amazing..but I swear to God if this means BOTW2 won't release this year...
Fair does. I think the remakes of red and blue and diamond and pearl, plus Archeus made it seem like there has been no down time with the series.The following had three year gaps:
Gold/Silver and Ruby/Sapphire
Black/White and X/Y
X/Y and Sun/Moon
Sun/Moon and Sword/Shield
Sword/Shield and Scarlet/Violet
Looks amazing..but I swear to God if this means BOTW2 won't release this year...
I think so as well. Pocket Monsters may be equivalent to the traditional Pokémon League quest, while Legends may focus on more action-oriented gameplay, especially catching. I don't think the overworld battles have to be exclusive to either style, of course.Was thinking something similar. They probably want to distinguish between "traditional" Pokemon games and Legends because they have pretty different focuses. Pocket Monsters will probably be used to signal that a Pokemon game has the traditional battle system, a focus on battling in general, has you travel to various towns throughout the region, etc. vs Legends' focus on catching Pokemon and crafting, etc.
ATM I think people should prepare for something closer to SWSH in terms of game mechanics though god please do not have it take 10 days to enter a bloody battle I-
They've stated its seamless open world, so it seems they've gone the full way with Arceus as a midpointFinally watched the trailer. Can't tell if it's more open world than Arceus.
Looks like another iterative step, which is cool I guess.
The iconic Japanese Gen 3/4-era logo of the mainline games makes a return for the first time with Scarlet and Violet. Combined with the fact that Legends had a unique logo makes me think they want to make the distinction between "Pocket Monsters" and "Pokémon Legends" clear in the series branding.
They generally change up the logo with every generation, but that one and variations of it was used heavily, across 12 mainline games (including BDSP) as well as several spin-offs (Box, Pinball RS, XD, and more).
Let's Go and Legends not mainline confirmed!Image cool, but this image is missing the Let Go and Legends logos.
I forgot how creepy valley those models were with the huge baby heads.
I just edited an existing image to point out the return of the old logo. Should have added LGPE, BDSP and LA. :P
Yea i feel like this further confirms my head canon theory that sword and shield were originally just 3ds games that got ported up to the switch cause boy that jump is massive
Fair does. I think the remakes of red and blue and diamond and pearl, plus Archeus made it seem like there has been no down time with the series.
I don't mind that as long as they are larger in scopeI know that this is way, way, way early to be saying such things, but I hope the fully open-world structure doesn't mean there's, like, four towns or something.
Yea i feel like this further confirms my head canon theory that sword and shield were originally just 3ds games that got ported up to the switch cause boy that jump is massive
It's impossible to think they planned to release a new generation on the 3ds in 2019. The console was already dead in 2018.Yea i feel like this further confirms my head canon theory that sword and shield were originally just 3ds games that got ported up to the switch cause boy that jump is massive
it gets worse when they moveI forgot how creepy valley those models were with the huge baby heads.
nah, that's definitely not likely. if anything the wild area was a late additionYea i feel like this further confirms my head canon theory that sword and shield were originally just 3ds games that got ported up to the switch cause boy that jump is massive
I was thinking this too, they look like 8 year olds and they're dressed in school uniforms so idk it would be a cool idea to show the characters age and show that the journey to the top takes time. Or Youngster Joey is about to show us what a Rattata can doIt's just a weird hunch but I feel we might see a time jump of sorts? Like maybe that's why the MC designs are based on young ones.
or maybe a top-down, indie-made Zelda spinoff! :O
Yea i feel like this further confirms my head canon theory that sword and shield were originally just 3ds games that got ported up to the switch cause boy that jump is massive
2009: Platinum
2010: HeartGold/SoulSilver
2011: Black/White
2012: Black2/White2
2013: X/Y
2014: Omega Ruby/Alpha Sapphire
2016: Sun/Moon
2017: Ultra Sun/Ultra Moon
2018: Let's Go Pikachu/Let's Go Eevee
2019: Sword/Shield
I do get where you're coming from kinda, fwiw. We've never had two games basically back-to-back before, which feels damn weird - even if, on a technicality, they're in two separate "years." But it might be worth noting, if you're not yet doing so, that we had a six-year streak already, with a year off followed by a four-year streak. They've been coming hard and fast since immediately after Platinum's three-year gap from Diamond/Pearl.