You've instantly become one of my favorite mods just like that lol
Why thank you!
You've instantly become one of my favorite mods just like that lol
This just makes me appreciate FF7RE more. I really don't like 1:1 remakes.
Some have and do use the argument for BD2, so I mean yeah lol. Other games looking low budget or simplistic doesn't make this look any less so.I can use that logic on bravely default 2, the new game in the octopath engine, or an 2d game. Take away the finer details and it can run in a 3ds. This was never supposed to look like a botw or odyssey. Look at how legends even looks. Not the greatest compared to the 2 games you just named and you can see the cut backs even in that game trailer. It's better the game looks like this then SwSh and run like complete ass. Like come on this is just crazy.
Honestly as much as I hate let's go I think the reaction to this remake is crazy bad. But at least it wasn't this right?
You have my sword! Well... uhhh... my Persona! LOL
Honestly as much as I hate let's go I think the reaction to this remake is crazy bad. But at least it wasn't this right?
It's still over a year away and pokemon more than 5 feet will be animated at 10fps, draw distract will be a little better , and if it has online like the wild area in SwSh all those little improvements will be gone. Now I'm still excited about legends let's not get the wrong idea here but that game looks like botw for pokemon from a distance but the finer details that I have mentioned before it is nothing like botw. I can look at botw and see a beautiful game from the blades of grass moving from the wind. Legends you are not gonna fully get that. You will have patches but botw still looks better graphically than legends. But again that doesn't take away from the fact I'm still excited about it because there are so many other things about it I'm excited for. Just like how this remake is exactly what I wanted a 1:1 remake and has a good art style to it. I would probably be disappointed if they did what they did to 3rd gen remakes. Which I didn't really care for.Some have and do use the argument for BD2, so I mean yeah lol. Other games looking low budget or simplistic doesn't make this look any less so.
And I could not disagree more on Legends. It's still over a year away and people can't stop talking on here and social media about how great it looks. It most definitely looks like those two, hell people keep calling it "Pokemon of the Wild." But I do agree completely on the point about this being better than SwSh-like though. I really disliked the idea of it being like those, especially with my problems with the wild area and the frame rate as you said.
This is what I thought of too.
That's a big oof.
Don't let it bother you. There's a lot of us that's still excited and cautiously optimistic about the game lol I really want the OTThe overwhelming toxic negativity in this thread is staggering, and Twitter isn't much better.
You can be disappointed, but jesus christ some of the shit some of y'all are spouting...
I get that but it's just like fix the expressions. This is throwing the baby out with the bath water.Unpopular opinion: while the new remake models aren't great, I much prefer not having my player character be a smiling buffoon the entire game. It doesn't make sense for a silent, blank slate protagonist.
The overwhelming toxic negativity in this thread is staggering, and Twitter isn't much better.
You can be disappointed, but jesus christ some of the shit some of y'all are spouting...
Upon further inspection the studio making this worked on Yakuza 0 and Dragon Quest XI, two of my favourite games ever, so I'm cautiously optimistic - art style is eh but tell me more about what's actually in the game
So whats the general thoughts on this since its more of a remake then the past ones they cant possibly go back to HMs can they? HMs were so bad in D/P its why I never finished it.
You didn't deserve this, Sinnoh, I'm sorry...
Graphical changes aside (which I personally like, btw) I don't get the complaints. Everyone usually complains when changes are made to their beloved classic games, Game Freak decides to do a "faithful remake" and everyone is complaining that their may not be changes?
??? Unless it's post-game content, remakes don't add Pokemon beyond their original games unless those Pokemon are evolutions or pre-evolutions added in a later generation. IIRC, ORAS was the only remake that did this for the main game. The other remakes had later generation Pokemon in the post-game, such as FRLG's Sevii Islands.So, given the phoned in nature of this, there won't be any Gen 5 and beyond 'mons? That alone is a shitty new precedent in the low bar nature from "modern TPC"
Well, not much more than what is in the original games, that's for sure.
I wonder if we'll get at least the 493 Pokémon from those games. Not every Gen IV was part of Sinnoh Pokédex, so unless they decide to change that to include them, they will have to implement the National Pokédex that was part of the post-game. Because there's also non-Sinnoh Dex Pokémon that appear in the post game, so how they will be included?
But it's so sad to think that even expecting 493 Pokémon in this game is having unrealistic expectations. I'm really not holding my breath
Mysims slander will not be tolerated, Chibi Dawn will remember this.Maybe because while they decided to do the "faithful remake," the execution is horrendously poor to many of us lol? MySims ass looking game.
Did he say otherwise tho?
Japanese Twitter likes it. I like it too, it was different than I imagined they would make it, but looks like it will be a nice trip down memory lane.The overwhelming toxic negativity in this thread is staggering, and Twitter isn't much better.
You can be disappointed, but jesus christ some of the shit some of y'all are spouting...
They changed Coles fabulous hair, they can change this, or at least make it look better! Lol. (It'll look the same when it releases)The overwhelming toxic negativity in this thread is staggering, and Twitter isn't much better.
You can be disappointed, but jesus christ some of the shit some of y'all are spouting...
At least it doesn't look like Legends which seems to just be on the constant verge of death because of the Switch's weak hardware?
I see two good looking games
There's a big difference between developing a game themselves and being one of 50+ outsource studios that ended up contributing to a game. Same reason why TOSE has contributed to a ton of great games but the ones developed by TOSE themselves generally don't turn out too well.Upon further inspection the studio making this worked on Yakuza 0 and Dragon Quest XI, two of my favourite games ever, so I'm cautiously optimistic - art style is eh but tell me more about what's actually in the game
Imagine looking at those AC screenshots (oh, god, the windows on the inside of the shop! The low-res item sprites!) and thinking BDSP is about the same in visual quality.
The trailer basically shows the game struggling to run on top of being super jaggy and it kinda just comes off as the game wanting more than the hardware is capable of.I don't understand why these comments have been popping up so much. Since when was Switch HW strengh based on how Pokemon games performed? Have some of you never seen or played a Switch game before??
I think this is a joke, but given the hyperbole here I'm not really sure about anything.Imagine looking at those AC screenshots (oh, god, the windows on the inside of the shop! The low-res item sprites!) and thinking BDSP is about the same in visual quality.
They have similar chibi art styles. That's not the same thing as having similar graphical fidelity.
I don't understand why they went out of their way to make this look like, well, this. It's like a poor imitation of the Link's Awakening Remake art style.
At least it doesn't look like Legends which seems to just be on the constant verge of death because of the Switch's weak hardware?
edit: To be more specific, I only its the overworld aspects that look like the poor imitation. In-battle looks fine.