I mean people said this with XY, that the first 3D Pokemon would have growing pains, and the next gen would be better, and that didn't really come to pass either. (I like gen 7 more than 6, but that has nothing really to do with the amount of content, per se.)
I just don't really see a lot of reason to expect gen 9 to magically be this huge improvement from SWSH.
"The games will be better without all of the Pokemon"
Pokemon Sword/Shield say hi.
Games from here on will be planned with the cut in mind"The games will be better without all of the Pokemon"
Pokemon Sword/Shield say hi.
That's exactly what Legends is?They're so far behind in that regard that imo the best way to proceed is to innovate in gameplay. And that's my point: I don't think their current vision and leadership will enable that for the foreseeable future.
How is Legends a substantial gameplay innovation exactly?
Completely different catching, completely different story set up, revamped movement options (dodge roll, sneaking, jumping etc) that tie into the action part of combat where the trainer can get hit, different way to handle turns, move from linear to open environments, climbing and flying everywhere, crafting, missions…
Quite an assumption.Never expect a Pokémon game from here on to have all Pokémon.
The series will be better for it.
This. No game should have crossed 250-300 to startNever expect a Pokémon game from here on to have all Pokémon.
The series will be better for it.
Quite an assumption.
Cutting things from games does not mean they are obligated to add other things in their place. Look at Sword and Shield.
For all we know, this is simply cost cutting on their part.
SWSH wasn't developed with the intent to cut, that happened late in development and thus isn't a valid example of what can be done for it.Quite an assumption.
Cutting things from games does not mean they are obligated to add other things in their place. Look at Sword and Shield.
For all we know, this is simply cost cutting on their part.
Yeah, I usually try not to bring up Let's Go in these contexts because it's a very weird game and the debate over whether or not it's mainline is tiring, but it unquestionably has a lot less content than the last time Gen 1 got remade despite having only like 40% of the number Pokémon in the older remake.I don't know why people are bringing SwSh into this, they did the cut in Let's Go and we got jack shit out of it, and that was intentional. Don't expect anything extra from these games anymore or them to get better just because they have less monsters to work with.
I don't think limiting the amount of Pokemon that appear in each game is going to lead to the games turning into the magical dream games people keep hammering on about. My interpretation was always like, hey guys there's over 1,000 of these fucking things. If we're gonna keep dropping new games every year we have to put a cap on the amount of shit we have to test.
I wonder how many times we'll have to hear that the NEXT gen of Pokemon will be better.
"Just wait til gen 7"
"Gen 7 is clearly a proof of concept. Watch how amazing gen 8 is"
"Gen 8 is definitely struggling cause these things take time but its still awesome. Watch as Gen 9 shows how improved everything is"
Insert how Gen 9 is obviously them trying something new and to get really excited for gen 10
Broadly speaking, maintaining the Pokémon models is exactly the sort of problem you can just throw more people and money at.I don't think anyone pro-dexit believes it will lead to dream games or some magical difference. People just accept that developer resources are finite with even the largest developers, and that even the largest developers prioritize and divert resources around. It's an acceptance that dev manpower and dev costs are spiraling out of control and it's not something you can just throw more people and money at.
It's just something brought up as proof dexit didn't work, but there's nothing to compare it to.
DP are far better than SwSh. There are very few if any mainline games I would put below SwSh. Personally I think GameFreak were at their absolute peak between Gen 4 and 5. Like there is a healthy gap between SwSh and every other Pokemon games outside of XY, and I like Gen 6 and 8.Will this game be better than sword and shield? I'm currently playing that and it's too easy. I'm just catching Pokémon before I fight Leon. Going by the trailer this looks to be better?
Broadly speaking, maintaining the Pokémon models is exactly the sort of problem you can just throw more people and money at.
Is always this, like tell me what game has more than 1000 unique models and animations? Pokemon is in a pretty unique situation which has effect on other things like no save states due to the fact that individual pokémon can move between games, you can even have a Pokemon from the original Diamon/Pearl into this gameMeanwhile, no one else is really putting games out like Pokemon.
This was the supposed comment. Someone who speak native French would have a better idea versus machine translation.
We have nothing to go on right now, they've basically revealed nothing about these games outside of the two trailers.Why is there talk about some other, future pokemon games, I'm interested in finding out why I should play remakes of Diamond and Pearl, other than "they are now with better graphics". Like if that's all there is to them, I will pass, and that will be that. But it seems sad that the great improvement that is gained by dropping the (to me at least) compelling feature of having a complete pokedex is simply a coat of paint.
The only thing we know about these games at the moment is that they're Diamond and Pearl with "better" graphics and some tweaks to the gameplay here and there. We know they've expanded the Underground feature to add more Pokemon in the game that weren't easily available in base D/P and there's moves and types that were added later in the series included. So right now it's looking like a remixed Diamond and Pearl.Why is there talk about some other, future pokemon games, I'm interested in finding out why I should play remakes of Diamond and Pearl, other than "they are now with better graphics". Like if that's all there is to them, I will pass, and that will be that. But it seems sad that the great improvement that is gained by dropping the (to me at least) compelling feature of having a complete pokedex is simply a coat of paint.
Hey hum, I've seen you repeatedly claim this. Do you happen to have any evidence?Games from here on will be planned with the cut in mind
SWSH was not
"The games will be better without all of the Pokemon"
Pokemon Sword/Shield say hi.
Leaks from SWSH's early development showed plans for every Pokémon, including Megas, to be includedHey hum, I've seen you repeatedly claim this. Do you happen to have any evidence?
I will never understand why the motion controls were so forced. Imagine being a fan of pokemon but you have a disability and are unable to play it because the game requires you to mimic a throw.Don't even need to go that far, just look at Let's Go. It's worse than it's GBA counterpart.
Forced Motion Controls to catch pokemon if you are playing docked. My word...
Of the 234 pokemon that didn't make it into SwSh, if BDSP is having all from 1 to 493, that means only 63 pokemon are left from Gens 5 through 7 that haven't made it onto the Switch. Thought you'd be interested to know.
All you honestly need is a grachomp. It can 0vs6 anything the game throws at you. Make sure to run Iron head or firefang if those pesky fairies gets in.Who you all using?
I think I might use my original JP Pearl team...Torterra, Luray, Staraptor, Drifblim, Lumineon, and...uh I honestly forgot who my sixth was I gotta check in Bank.
Edit: Bronzong. Kind lame in game but good at catching the Legendaries
This! Gen 7 is better than whatever their favorite gen is, so I stand my ground 💅But Gen 7 are the best Pokemon games. I never heard any argument of proof of concept.
The consensus seems to be that the models broke in shifting to the modified engine on new hardware and so they had to reimplement bits which takes a hell of a long time for the amount of models/animations. 1100+ unique models with dozens of animations; that'd take years with hundreds of staffI see no reason to believe Gen 9 will be as messy as SwSh. The game clearly had development issues that "talent" or developer count could fix. Speaking of is there any info out there on what the fuck happened with SwSh?
Will this game be better than sword and shield? I'm currently playing that and it's too easy. I'm just catching Pokémon before I fight Leon. Going by the trailer this looks to be better?
Yes?If a D/P remake should have features from platinum, otherwise they have cut features, them I assume a 2nd SM64 remake should have all the features from the DS version, otherwise they are cutting features right?
I have seen so many hate the DS version and therefore would only want a remake of vanilla 64 without any of the DS features.
I have seen so many hate the DS version and therefore would only want a remake of vanilla 64 without any of the DS features.
So is 64 DS'
My main point is would you consider that cutting features?I think the difference here is that not everybody agrees on that front. But yes, I would prefer to see the DS content integrated into a remake as well.
SwSh didn't have Ampharos and was not better for it.Never expect a Pokémon game from here on to have all Pokémon.
The series will be better for it.
The consensus seems to be that the models broke in shifting to the modified engine on new hardware and so they had to reimplement bits which takes a hell of a long time for the amount of models/animations. 1100+ unique models with dozens of animations; that'd take years with hundreds of staff
Here's the imported animation of a Sceptile put into the game prior to it being added in the game, showing something going very wrong. It's more complex than this but it's an example
It's why all those mod groups which were "We'll add all the Pokémon back" stopped after Kanto, since they were already done for Let's Go. They just conveniently stopped and disappeared, never to be heard from again.
I also assume you mean that talent or developer count couldn't fix, not could fix
If what you want is difficulty, then no. Pokémon games are always easy. Closest to not being was Ultra Sun/Ultra Moon.