so i was correct in saying it shouldn't be used then?The term transsexual is extremely outdated and if ever used should probably be used specifically for people post-SRS or have the desire to do so. They don't indicate the same thing.
so i was correct in saying it shouldn't be used then?The term transsexual is extremely outdated and if ever used should probably be used specifically for people post-SRS or have the desire to do so. They don't indicate the same thing.
It's both. Stay in school, kids.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/female?s=t
But in practical speech, it's awkward. I think it fits better in medical/biological dialogue.
It's both a noun and an adjective from what I can tell
"female
noun
Definition of female
: a female person : a woman or a girl"
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/female
I didn't. I said that men should listen to women when they say these things. You're welcome to disagree with OP.Don't put all women in this. I disagree with the OP and I'm a woman.
Thank you.
The fact that so many people ITT seemingly can't differentiate between the adjective and the noun might actually explain why this is even a thing.
It's literally 1st grade English! "High level" my ass, kids these days, grumble grumble grumble rant
yeah, I dunno why I keep getting random feelings of deja vu
Just asked my wife and she disagrees with the OP too. I still don't understand how or why it's offensive.
Women tend to themselves use 'boy' to refer to guys more often, especially if they're roughly the same age or younger, same for girls with other women. Girl or boy can be kinda... patronizing if said a certain way but that's a lot to do with tone and context. I tend to use 'men' and 'boys' and 'women' and 'girls' interchangeably. Unless I'm referring to someone middle aged or older and I'll say something more... respecting like gentleman or lady or something.I don't even use the word "female" that much in real life. I usually use the words "woman" or "girl" depending on what's going on.
On the flip side... I get referred to as "boy" almost all the time by some of my women friends. Lol
If you are talking about people, calling a subset of humankind 'females' is implying 'female humans'. Which we have a word for. It's women.
It's about not using the word "females", specifically, as a noun during casual conversation as some kind of semi-dogwhistle for saying "bitches". Just look at the results for when you search the word on Twitter: https://twitter.com/search?q=females&src=typd
I've said it before but I was shouted at. I feel some people who use female do it so they don't have to call a trans woman a woman.
Right, and I'm all for that, but 'too clinical' is great distance from 'dehumanising as fuck'. I am a human, and as so I am also an animal, a mammal more specifically. For people to be offended by terms because they acknowledge humans as animals is just beyond stupid to me. You're already winning, we're already by orders of magnitude the winning species, do we have to pretend we're not even in the same biological domain? It's absurd.It's like someone listing out enthicities and says, "white people, asians, and... African Americans-"
It's not "offensive" as much as it's overly clinical and shows a lack of experience with the group in question. When someone clearly says African American in my presence as to "not offend me" I roll my eyes a little. Like bruh, just say black people.
Same with "females". Sounds like you're reading a goddamn textbook. Just say women, or girls, or ladies, or etc etc etc.
*sigh*Isn't this statement generalizing all women as sharing the same thoughts on the matter, and thus pretty non-feminist?
I know someone who uses 'women' and 'females' in the same conversation, I called him out on it yet he carried on.
Just use women or girls FFS.
Females makes me cringe inside.
The "context" here is that a woman is trying to tell you that something is offensive, and that you, as a man, are telling her she's wrong and using the fact that you identify yourself as a feminist as justification for it.
You literally just mansplained while calling yourself a feminist.
In that case, it'd be a "girl", just as a 6 year old male human would be a "boy".
yeah, but you can use "girl", "kid", "little woman" or any other synonym before falling back to counting people like they have to be sized for slaughter.
It's like someone listing out enthicities and says, "white people, asians, and... African Americans-"
It's not "offensive" as much as it's overly clinical and shows a lack of experience with the group in question. When someone clearly says African American in my presence as to "not offend me" I roll my eyes a little. Like bruh, just say black people.
Yeah I knowOh you got it! Everything is offensive!!! That's clearly all this is.
/s
Females is absolutely valid in my eyes, as it correctly describes humans of any age and female sex, whereas women includes only humans of female sex from a (underspecified) age. Same goes for males, of course. I can think of only very few instances, where "females and men" makes any sense (i.e. iff you specifically want to exclude boys, but include girls; though adults and girls would be equivalent). I cannot see a scientifically correct denomination as dehumanising.
This kind of made-up psychological analysis is just as gratuitous and cringey as the phenomenon it tries to "explain".The reason people do this is because subconsciously some men have this weird hang-up about referring to their adult female counterparts as "women." They can't call us "girls" (although many of them do anyway) because a "girl" is usually a young person, so they fall back on "females," which is weird as hell.
Then "women" is fine generally, unless you're writing or talking formally. You'd have to give context for me to go more into detail.
Women tend to themselves use 'boy' to refer to guys more often, especially if they're roughly the same age or younger, same for girls with other women. Girl or boy can be kinda... patronizing if said a certain way but that's a lot to do with tone and context. I tend to use 'men' and 'boys' and 'women' and 'girls' interchangeably. Unless I'm referring to someone middle aged or older and I'll say something more... respecting like gentleman or lady or something.
I'm not gonna accept that excuse when they're already showing rather fluent English ability. Also, adjectives and nouns are pretty much in all languages, so the difference is pretty obvious. I barely know Spanish, but I understand that the adjective "mojado" means wet and isn't offensive. But if I use it as a noun to for a Latin American person, then it is offensive.
Just asked my wife and she disagrees with the OP too. I still don't understand how or why it's offensive.
This is not an English-exclusive problem.With a large amount of people who don't speak English as their first language and a bunch of people who take pride in not reading too well to make jokes quickly, I think in threads like these you can't write up a normal 'hey this is weird can you not do this thanks' if you want your point across you need solid examples and a clear straightforward message. The post with the checkmarks is already better but it's halfway down the first page so most aren't going to see it and the threads already degreased into some weird whats a noun or an adjective direction and it all could have been avoided.
But why thoughFuck all this "I just don't understand" nonsense. It isn't hard. It's such a weak excuse too. Referring to men as men and women as female has the clear connotation that you're not referring to women as people. Doesn't matter if that's not how you mean it. Learn some intraspection for once.
So if it's a legit noun then there should really be not much of an issue here.