I don't blame Jim. I just said the optics have been bad in this gen despite the success. Xbox was going to do this regardless.
The other stuff I took out immediately. I guess not fast enough.
Microsoft is also hurting the industry with its purchase, but Sony doing the same in retatlation would only make things worse for us.
Microsoft is also hurting the industry with its purchase, but Sony doing the same in retatlation would only make things worse for us.
That's not an answer for shareholders. Big 3rd party multiplatform games like CoD make Sony a lot of profit with little investment. Its like free money. Losing that means revenues and profits will decrease. All investors care about is growth and profitsAll Jim can say is they will invest into more great content that you can only get on PS.
I mean there not much he could have done about MS paying 70 billion for a company .
Well to be fair even Jim Ryan has said it might be the last Sony console.
It is like watching a person get beaten up and telling them not to fight back because if you do you will be no better then the aggressor.
Of couse GP profitable is relevant lol...there's no free lunch and no company reaches the size of Microsoft doing charity. And if GP isn't a profitable approach, why to claim for SONY doing the same? they will fall first...
Kinda wonder if Sony will even be willing to still invest so much money to stay competitive in such uncertain times. Who says that buying a publisher now would even change much anymore. Maybe it would just be throwing money into the fire. I do not envy Jim Ryan right now. Must be brutal.
The first time in a long time I have no idea how things shake out.
I also think Steam users will be the next ones to get fucked.
I fully expect MS to start making their games Gamepass exclusive to really drive growth once they don't have to play Good Guy MS anymore.
It's not about retaliation. It's about being able to compete. Nintendo and Microsoft have way bigger IPs now. MS has better services too and twice as many studios. Most of the remaining third-party studios will get bought anyways. With or without Sony.Microsoft is also hurting the industry with its purchase, but Sony doing the same in retatlation would only make things worse for us.
Yeah that's definitely what it's like. Sony must buy Capcom or perish. there's no other alternative.It's not about retaliation. It's about being able to compete. Nintendo and Microsoft have way bigger IPs now. MS has better services too and much more studios. Most of the remaining third-party studios will get bought anyways. With or without Sony.
Sony either Sony starts buying some of them too, or they're gone forever.
Heh, it was an interesting experience seeing it drop since I bought my stocks not too long ago. Still, makes no difference to me as it'll rebound. I just laughed it off, I'm in it for the long haul with my stock purchase :D
That's not an answer for shareholders. Big 3rd party multiplatform games like CoD make Sony a lot of profit with little investment. Its like free money. Losing that means revenues and profits will decrease. All investors care about is growth and profits
To then say "well... we will just spend even more of your money to make up for the steady free money we just lost" ... doesn't sound too appealing to me if I was a Sony shareholder.
Doubtful. They're coming off a year as one of the top publishers on Steam and having success with Game Pass. People subbing to GP on their app didn't stop their games from being top sellers on Steam and seemed to have really good synergy to push early access sales of Forza in particular.I also think Steam users will be the next ones to get fucked.
I fully expect MS to start making their games Gamepass exclusive to really drive growth once they don't have to play Good Guy MS anymore.
Buying one of the big Japanese publishers just seems like a different ballgame altogether. Feels like one of the major ones would have been acquired already at this point if it was doable.If companies like Squenix and Capcom aren't willing to be bought out, a hostile takeover doesn't seem likely. I don't think it will happen
They will lose if they just sit and do nothing. They are not Nintendo and they cannot survive by attempting to replicate Nintendo's business model.
Well that is all he can do and maybe talk about mobile .
Do some M&A and expand on first party and also talk about growth .
Sort what Netflix had to do when they were losing content .
really cool that playstation is focusing their efforts on pc, while MS is actually using money to make their console more attractive :)
Of course they have to do something. But copying MS is not the answer. MS is going to spend billions and billions more, no way can Sony match up to them
I would say keep doing what they are doing now, focus on quality, make smart acquisitions when available and maybe acquire a small publisher to push Indie and AA initiatives.
It is like watching a person get beaten up and telling them not to fight back because if you do you will be no better then the aggressor.
Though I think Sony should try and go after more dev numbers then anything else so that they can streamline their production and release process by several multitude.
They need big IPs which are still alive and strong. The IPs you've mentioned above are dead. Nobody (besides some hardcore Sony fans) cares about them anymore.Also revive tons of I.Ps as result, from Sly Cooper to Jeto Moto, to Ape Escape, to KillZone, to MotorStorm, to Resistance, etc...
I kept them. I think (or hope) they will go up again after the dust settles. Please god. Lol.I sold all my Sony stocks luckily soon after the announcement. Still had some losses but they were balanced out by other stock making a jump like Take2.
They are willing to sell because investors want money. Pay the right price and it's done.If companies like Squenix and Capcom aren't willing to be bought out, a hostile takeover doesn't seem likely. I don't think it will happen
Literally.
SIE is getting their legs swept from under them, but apparently they should just pre-emptively lay down in order to...still get beat the fuck up, lol
really cool that playstation is focusing their efforts on pc, while MS is actually using money to make their console more attractive :)
Sony might have to start aquiring things just to stay competitive, even if it won't be as big as Activision/Bethesda. Take-two makes the most sense if Sony was serious. Before today, I would have said Take-Two was too big to buy out. But actually i don't really think so.Well, Sony will respond with something, just don't know what. I expect an acquisition will be announced sometime before the end of the year.
I feel like the obvious candidates are Square-Enix and Capcom, maybe Sega.
I know some feel like those won't do much but I think they definitely would. I don't see Sony trying to go after Take-Two though.
They need big IPs which are still alive and strong. The IPs you've mentioned above are dead. Nobody (besides some hardcore Sony fans) cares about them anymore.
I kept them. I think (or hope) they will go up again after the dust settles. Please god. Lol.
I think this is important to reiterate. I notice some people are still focused on what Sony can do to push hardware, in the very near future solely pushing hardware will be irrelevant. It's all about the service, both on their console and more importantly the wider ecosystem beyond it. Microsoft was talking about this back in 2015, and laying the groundwork with development of their PC store and cloud infrastructure. Sony is barely starting to look at this now, 7 years later.The bigger question is what will they do with there service .
Hardware is a short term matter now .
MS spend this 70 billion for there service .
Yes PS will lose access to those games... but you are all acting like because of that ALL the people who played COD on the PS will buy an Xbox tomorrow (or a gamepass)Their subscribers will benefit, while PlayStation players will be permanently left with less content.
Of what? The future of MS or the future of gaming? (I want to see the receipt)
It's a big move by MS but this is crazy talk. Sony are comfortably home console market leaders.It's not about retaliation. It's about being able to compete. Nintendo and Microsoft have way bigger IPs now. MS has better services too and twice as many studios. Most of the remaining third-party studios will get bought anyways. With or without Sony.
Sony either starts buying some of them too or they're gone forever.
I'm only talking about the optics. Money wise, Jim has been great for Sony. But I have no idea what this changes for the company now.
They can easily buy Square-Enix and Capcom if they wanted to. Just as an example. They have a lot of cash. A lot.What happens if you are beaten by someone with a club, and you only have a straw? If you feel its an exaggerated analogy, remember MS just dropped 70 billion dollars.
Not saying Sony shouldn't do anything, but they have to be smart and play to their strengths. MS is continue to spend billions and billions. Sony simply can't keep up even if they want to.
Yes PS will lose access to those games... but you are all acting like because of that ALL the people who played COD on the PS will buy an Xbox tomorrow (or a gamepass)
Of what? The future of MS or the future of gaming? (I want to see the receipt)
From my reading of the Steam results, I would say the opposite is what I find, at least for the bigger releases. FH5 releasing day and date on steam was nearly matched by GoW on steam close to four years after initial release in terms of concurrent players (and this stat skews in favor of FH5 due to being a true premier launch already). MS made a lot of noise about 15 million players on that game and everything, but its boxed sales can be compared to GoW coming to steam 4 years later after selling 20 million copies on PS. This to me seems like perfect reason to not put your games on a sub service at launch if you want to also get boxed sales. I see MS pulling out of steam releases sometime in the future but obviously this is just a feeling and maybe they never will.Doubtful. They're coming off a year as one of the top publishers on Steam and having success with Game Pass. People subbing to GP on their app didn't stop their games from being top sellers on Steam and seemed to have really good synergy to push early access sales of Forza in particular.
I think this is important to reiterate. I notice some people are still focused on what Sony can do to push hardware, in the very near future solely pushing hardware will be irrelevant. It's all about the service, both on their console and more importantly the wider ecosystem beyond it. Microsoft was talking about this back in 2015, and laying the groundwork with development of their PC store and cloud infrastructure. Sony is barely starting to look at this now, 7 years later.
That's where Sony is slipping behind, they're 5 years behind Microsoft in the development of their service and it'll be tough to catch up.
Microsoft is making their service look attractive, not their necessarily their console. All their games are day 1 PC on Gamepass, call me when Sony has that level of service.really cool that playstation is focusing their efforts on pc, while MS is actually using money to make their console more attractive :)
That's Nintendo with the Switch.It's a big move by MS but this is crazy talk. Sony are comfortably home console market leaders.
I wouldn't mind seeing another Resistance game.It is like watching a person get beaten up and telling them not to fight back because if you do you will be no better then the aggressor.
Though I think Sony should try and go after more dev numbers then anything else so that they can streamline their production and release process by several multitude.
Also revive tons of I.Ps as result, from Sly Cooper to Jeto Moto, to Ape Escape, to KillZone, to MotorStorm, to Resistance, etc...
They are already possibly trying to diversify but I think they need to inject a big boost into their arm and go even harder and faster.
By 2025 do you think MS will allow most of those I.Ps to release on PS? I doubt it. They will also be tossing out games after games every year.
My biggest worry is SIE's AAA output suffering because they can't rely on 3P revenue funding development if acquisitions of this scale continue. Nor can they rely on 3P software to plug-in the gaps during 1P droughts. That'll further incentives Sony to monetize their big hitter to stay afloat (I don't want a ton of MTX in my GoW!).Yes PS will lose access to those games... but you are all acting like because of that ALL the people who played COD on the PS will buy an Xbox tomorrow (or a gamepass)