That would be actually pretty cool. Maybe when PSVR2 gets released and Valve releases Alyx there they'll get a partnership or something.While it's great for pc to get ps games, would be great if many of The top pc games were compatible with the ps5, such as tarkov, squads, arma, csgo, ect....
Steam and ps combining, whether on ps5 or pc.
One can dream.
Sure it could. It depends who your're talking to. When I buy a PlayStation, part of the value comes from the fact that I now have access to great games that I do not have access to elsewhere. If those games are available on other platforms with superior versions, that's a direct reduction of value from my standpoint.But the value of the console doesn't' "decrease" by having their games on PC. The costumer base between PC and console isn't the same, despite what you read around here.
the guy said that there are 40 million player right now that already have a poweful PC, I replied that if that was true none of them would play FIFA or COD (for example) on PS, since they could buy them at a lower price and play them with better settings and with free onlineThese casual games selling more on consoles doesn't mean that they don't sell on PC especially with games like witcher 3 and souls that Sold more than PS or equal to PC on PC. The point is AAA games not on the casual side, often sell a lot on PC even if they don't sell more than PS and the hardcore gaming crowd on PC is less likely to shift to any console because of the vast differences in both experiences on either ecosystem.
I think Sony still needs to incentivise people to use the PS5 as their main console and buy their third party games there. A delay of only one year makes it too easy for people to say "I'm just gonna buy a 400$ graphics card and then I can play Xbox games and PC exclusives too".That's a pretty small slice of pie.
That number has the potential to become huge, which is what they want obviously. The problem is getting there would require a fundamental shift in strategy. Pumping out meh quality 3-4 year old ports is not a stellar strategy. You'd need to put ample resources into ensuring quality ports as the PC community generally has high standards in this regard. Then, you'd need to consider launching closer to the console release a la RDR2. Then of course you gotta market it.
It definitely does decrease the value prop of purchasing a console if you have a PC. Why purchase a console when you can play it on PC? Sony wants to drive their hardware AND software sales. So I foresee them doing exactly what they are doing now. Releasing select PC ports later down the line. I'm not arguing with you that there is a market in the PC space for their first party games. I'm saying, from everything we know about their console business, it doesn't make sense that they would, all within one year, go from the way they are releasing with PC games now to Day 1 releases of their flagship titles.
Both of you seem to think that PC players would buy a PS assuming the PS exclusive games are good enough.Sure it could. It depends who your're talking to. When I buy a PlayStation, part of the value comes from the fact that I now have access to great games that I do not have access to elsewhere. If those games are available on other platforms with superior versions, that's a direct reduction of value from my standpoint.
You shouldn't take to Steam hardware survey so seriously. It's opt in and most people don't opt in anything these days. The 4k number is way off since the Steam survey won't detect a 4k TV unless it's your main display.Both of you seem to think that PC players would buy a PS assuming the PS exclusive games are good enough.
I find that idea hard to believe. With most PC players playing at 1080p and having GPUs that cost 100-200€ i don't believe they would be willing to "waste" 200-400€ on a console + the online subscription. Both of you seem to be thinking that despite most PC players not being able to afford a good GPU and/or a >1440p monitor that somehow would be able to afford and buy a piece of hardware + subscription to just play a handful of games yet won't do so for their main platform.
The way i see it the players that buy PC and consoles are very few in number. For example less that 10% of steam users play above 1080p. Only 2% play at 4k. Only these users could affor to buy a console. Even than how many of these 10% of players would buy a console? like 1440p users (6%) won't/can't buy a 4k screen yet could they really afford a console + subscription?
The way i see it most of the current PC market (>90% of steam users) can't afford/won't buy a console. Yet they still could be paying for the sony games assuming sony can out-hype or/and have a good product VS the PC competition. Lastly a PC version is "forever" and sony can keep selling their catologue "indefinitely" having some constant money stream.
Obviously Sony is probably too big to get a porting studio/teach their staff ready in 1 year but IMO not releasing at the same time on PC and console is wasting the already great marketing that sony already does. If SOny can get their hype to work not only on console but on PC sony can easily push a lot of software, specially on PC side where great WoM can make a game sell for a long time.
A bit off topic, Frag Waffles ; personally your comment is extremely distasteful and, IMO, offensive. If a product values is depend on depriving others of their access is, IMO, extremely mean and in many cases harmful to the poorer society members. I can't imagine how you feel you are better served because some company restricts acess to a product instead of the company making their product better than the competition.
I'll be blunt and say you are going into my ignore list. I find it distasteful that you prefer to gate poor people out of an ecosystem so you can have better value/more fun. If PS isn't worthwhile to you without exclusives maybe the problem is the hardware? not the lack of exclusives?
Actually this isn't my assumption at all. I'm saying that Sony knows there is a demographic of gamers that won't buy their consoles and are fine with that. My argument wasn't against Sony porting games but that they will NOT be porting their exclusives Day 1 with PC by next year. I stand by that argument.Both of you seem to think that PC players would buy a PS assuming the PS exclusive games are good enough.
I find that idea hard to believe. With most PC players playing at 1080p and having GPUs that cost 100-200€ i don't believe they would be willing to "waste" 200-400€ on a console + the online subscription. Both of you seem to be thinking that despite most PC players not being able to afford a good GPU and/or a >1440p monitor that somehow would be able to afford and buy a piece of hardware + subscription to just play a handful of games yet won't do so for their main platform.
The way i see it the players that buy PC and consoles are very few in number. For example less that 10% of steam users play above 1080p. Only 2% play at 4k. Only these users could affor to buy a console. Even than how many of these 10% of players would buy a console? like 1440p users (6%) won't/can't buy a 4k screen yet could they really afford a console + subscription?
The way i see it most of the current PC market (>90% of steam users) can't afford/won't buy a console. Yet they still could be paying for the sony games assuming sony can out-hype or/and have a good product VS the PC competition. Lastly a PC version is "forever" and sony can keep selling their catologue "indefinitely" having some constant money stream.
Obviously Sony is probably too big to get a porting studio/teach their staff ready in 1 year but IMO not releasing at the same time on PC and console is wasting the already great marketing that sony already does. If SOny can get their hype to work not only on console but on PC sony can easily push a lot of software, specially on PC side where great WoM can make a game sell for a long time.
A bit off topic, Frag Waffles ; personally your comment is extremely distasteful and, IMO, offensive. If a product values is depend on depriving others of their access is, IMO, extremely mean and in many cases harmful to the poorer society members. I can't imagine how you feel you are better served because some company restricts acess to a product instead of the company making their product better than the competition.
I'll be blunt and say you are going into my ignore list. I find it distasteful that you prefer to gate poor people out of an ecosystem so you can have better value/more fun. If PS isn't worthwhile to you without exclusives maybe the problem is the hardware? not the lack of exclusives?
misread what you said. I thought you said sony wouldn't port day 1 ever. My bad. I apologize for the misunderstanding .Actually this isn't my assumption at all. I'm saying that Sony knows there is a demographic of gamers that won't buy their consoles and are fine with that. My argument wasn't against Sony porting games but that they will NOT be porting their exclusives Day 1 with PC by next year. I stand by that argument.
Maybe i'm wrong but i don't think that the numbers would be that far from the mark that we can just dismiss the survey. The most played video games on PC usually all have low specs required.You shouldn't take to Steam hardware survey so seriously. It's opt in and most people don't opt in anything these days. The 4k number is way off since the Steam survey won't detect a 4k TV unless it's your main display.
u g h 🙄Please no. That would mean the pc userbase would hold this game back so much. Yes, even you with your ssd.
This seems hilariously silly right now. They haven't been transparent about the platforms because it's a first party game and they've only shown a teaser, lol.$50 million? They really going all in then.
I expect God of War: Ragnarok to be day 1 on PC. Would explain why they haven't been transparent about its platforms.
Please no. That would mean the pc userbase would hold this game back so much. Yes, even you with your ssd.
If ps5 sells well, there will still be a ps6 I am sure, no matter what.I wonder is Sony will shift to PC and slowly transition out of the console space. PS6 could just be a software app for PC.
I mean they are losing games via MS' acquisitions with more to come and then they plan to port their games to PC. That leaves PS5 and future consoles on a weak state to a point people really won't need to buy a Playstation.
I think you just misunderstood my post.A bit off topic, Frag Waffles ; personally your comment is extremely distasteful and, IMO, offensive. If a product values is depend on depriving others of their access is, IMO, extremely mean and in many cases harmful to the poorer society members. I can't imagine how you feel you are better served because some company restricts acess to a product instead of the company making their product better than the competition.
I'll be blunt and say you are going into my ignore list. I find it distasteful that you prefer to gate poor people out of an ecosystem so you can have better value/more fun. If PS isn't worthwhile to you without exclusives maybe the problem is the hardware? not the lack of exclusives?
I mean, why not?Like I said in the other thread, they are gonna drop Bloodborne and make a gajillion dollars.
PlayStation exclusives are console sellers. Sony is paying for third party exclusives too, timed or otherwise. GOW2 on PC day one is simply not happening. 1-3 years later, it may happen.$50 million? They really going all in then.
I expect God of War: Ragnarok to be day 1 on PC. Would explain why they haven't been transparent about its platforms.
It definitely does decrease the value prop of purchasing a console if you have a PC. Why purchase a console when you can play it on PC? Sony wants to drive their hardware AND software sales. So I foresee them doing exactly what they are doing now. Releasing select PC ports later down the line. I'm not arguing with you that there is a market in the PC space for their first party games. I'm saying, from everything we know about their console business, it doesn't make sense that they would, all within one year, go from the way they are releasing with PC games now to Day 1 releases of their flagship titles.
1st thing that came to my mind, Sony doing random shit that they wont really commit to maybe.
They could have if they sub to ps now.. teehee..that's great, i'd love for my PC friends to enjoy some of the games i've been talking about
It was bad.Sony released one ok PC port with little marketing. So wow, they must really be going all in then.
The way i see it the players that buy PC and consoles are very few in number. For example less that 10% of steam users play above 1080p. Only 2% play at 4k. O
Please no. That would mean the pc userbase would hold this game back so much. Yes, even you with your ssd.
Please no. That would mean the pc userbase would hold this game back so much. Yes, even you with your ssd.
Ahh yes, the PC userbase, who famously never upgrade their hardware for new games.
What the hell kind of take is this?Sure it could. It depends who your're talking to. When I buy a PlayStation, part of the value comes from the fact that I now have access to great games that I do not have access to elsewhere. If those games are available on other platforms with superior versions, that's a direct reduction of value from my standpoint.
There are a lot of weebs on PC, things like Gravity Rush etc would do well on there.
This is actually a great idea Gravity Rush on PC would be perfect, can imagine the modding possibilities etcThere are a lot of weebs on PC, things like Gravity Rush etc would do well on there.
$50 million? They really going all in then.
I expect God of War: Ragnarok to be day 1 on PC. Would explain why they haven't been transparent about its platforms.
Nowhere did I say this, nor do I believe this.What value do you get from us not having access to those games?
You must be one of those people who prays for Sony to make studio acquisitions, just because others can't have the stuff anymore.Sure it could. It depends who your're talking to. When I buy a PlayStation, part of the value comes from the fact that I now have access to great games that I do not have access to elsewhere. If those games are available on other platforms with superior versions, that's a direct reduction of value from my standpoint.
What value do you get from us not having access to those games?
If those games are available on other platforms with superior versions, that's a direct reduction of value from my standpoint.
Nope. Never said anything like this. Maybe understand the context of my original reply, or see #118 for more!You must be one of those people who prays for Sony to make studio acquisitions, just because others can't have the stuff anymore.
How badly did the Zenimax deal hurt your soul?
Maybe you express your view poorly, as evidenced by the number of people who took it the exact way I did.Nope. Never said anything like this. Maybe understand the context of my original reply, or see #118 for more!
I'll be honest, I stopped playing Gravity Rush on Vita because the whole time, I couldn't stop thinking "this camera control would be a whole lot better with a mouse".