Ryan then went on to write that he "would like to share something lighthearted to help inspire everyone to be mindful of having balance that can help ease the stress of uncertain world events," saying it was recently his two cats' first birthday and elaborating over the next few paragraphs about his cats' birthday cakes, their noises and his desire to one day get a dog.
They could just shut the fuck up since it's not their business.I agree with most of you here. But I do have an honest question:
If there's a group of talented devs working on a game for years/months that either don't care for the subject (because of political ignorance, who knows, they are just focused on their careers) or are dumb to be against abortion and just don't want conflict in the office, what would be the right call? Let the discussion take over? Fire who's against/neutral?
Yeah, they should be fired. At that point they clearly care more about telling everyone their shitty opinion on women's rights than they do about their job.But what if they don't? That's my question. What if the discussion takes over?
Of what? Kids are a HUGE drain on society and the economy, so i would think the government would be all for abortions.
I would've loved to have seen his face when he hit send and to see what his reaction is right now. I'm sure he was thinking "everyone will love me for this". Jim Ryan has said some really dumb stuff before, but this... this takes the cake.who says shit like this in an CORPORATE EMAIL? without anyone reading it over???
There is only one valid "opinion" on the topic of abortion rights and that is "women should have abortion rights."
Anything less than that should not be respected. Ever.
i still cant process why they changed Shawn Layden for this fool
Like did he seriously think employees based in a company based in CALIFORNIA were going to take that email well?Why did he send this to his teams?. Do we know if there are strong tensions on this subject within the staff of Playstation?
Or was he just stupid?
Overpopulation is something i believe will bite us hard in the ass at some point in the future. Lack of food, clean drinking water etc. More people means this will happen sooner. That's the society part of my comment.Eh? Strange post. Low fertility rates are disastrous for the economy. And what on earth do you mean kids are a "drain on society"? And you realise kids grow up right? Like you?
Pro lifers are mostly religious nuts and it's those fairytale beliefs that guides their ridiculous opinions on women's rights.
Yup, his Twitter makes it clear where he'd stand on these kinds of topics. Such a shame he left PlayStation.
They know where the door is.But what if they don't? That's my question. What if the discussion takes over?
He replaced Andrew House not Shawn Layden, he got replaced by Hermen Hulst.
Yes?Unless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?
"One side wants to force women to give birth against their will even in cases of rape and incest. The other side doesn't. Can't we all just get along and watch some wholesome cat videos?"
FFS
Yes. Someone's rights shouldn't be up for debate.Unless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?
I agree with most of you here. But I do have an honest question:
If there's a group of talented devs working on a game for years/months that either don't care for the subject (because of political ignorance, who knows, they are just focused on their careers) or are dumb to be against abortion and just don't want conflict in the office, what would be the right call? Let the discussion take over? Fire who's against/neutral?
Yes. It is a religious thing.
Taking a stance on an issue that most people are on the same page about shouldn't be too hardUnless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?
Shawn Layden wasn't really that great, this is on another level (different role too i think) but lets not romanticize shawn.i still cant process why they changed Shawn Layden for this fool
Unless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?
Of course yes, because those who are against do not have the right to force woman to give birth against their willUnless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?
Seems like he wanted to a bit about being anti-choice by hiding it under a false veneer of civility.He is not even trying, and what was even the point of that email?
Unless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?
The head of my company both siding something like rights to abortions, before waffling on about his cats and wanting a dog would get me pretty annoyed.Unless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?
Unless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?
Unless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?
Unless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?
By "retract", do you mean they sent a follow-up apology email or they literally just told IT to recall the email? If it's the latter, they are absolutely clueless idiots.This is somehow worse than the CEO at my wife's work sending out the "All Lives Matter" email before a day later retracting it. Then last year sending a "I think work from home should end, because I like looking at my secretary" email before retracting that one, too.
Shut the hell up, Jim.
Seriously why is he leader again?
It seemed like the old PS4 guard did an insane good job last gen and then suddenly the year before the PS5 launched, everything, the leadership roles were all changed.
Just how many and who asses did everyone kiss to cause all that to happen to get this PS5 communications PR nightmare of leadership?
More proof that there are always people that will defend anythingUnless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?
Unless I'm misunderstanding the article, email says something like "hey, some people are pro abortion, others against it, we gotta live with each other. btw, my cat's birthday was a lot of fun!"
This is outrage worthy?