Except now they've invested HEAVILY in 1st party studios and GP, a platform to deliver those games as well as lots of third party for a super affordable price.unfortunately this is microsofts #1 problem going back three generations now
Alright sure. I'll go with around 15 million consoles a (fiscal) yearHow many consoles do you think Sony will sell?
So I can bookmark that shit.
Articles like this are written about each of the big 3, it's not just Sony.
So because the service is not that good, we must ignore the fact Sony and MS are working to improve both companies streaming services? At the end of the day, is most likely that Sony and MS will eventually be using the exact same streaming distrubuition tech.It's never mentioned because it's the only one with a streaming game service up and running. People already know PS Now isn't very good.
Right at the end of that article: You Might like - "Xbox Two Could Thrash Sony PS5 in the Next Round of the Console Wars"
I mean...they aren't really trying to hide it.
It will be DOA because of 599 or even 499, not because of the hard-core first strategy.
Indeed, and it's just assumed the others will be good in blind faith. I realise Stadia had its beta last year but that was extremely limited only to the US, only to those with a strong enough connection and of course only those who signed up because they had an enthusiast interest in cloud gaming in the first place.It's never mentioned because it's the only one with a streaming game service up and running. People already know PS Now isn't very good.
It wasn't on 360 at all.unfortunately this is microsofts #1 problem going back three generations now
unfortunately this is microsofts #1 problem going back three generations now
Hardcore gamers just means people willing to pay MSRP for consoles and games.MARK MY WORDS...
This thread is not going to age well with this point of view. Sony may say THEY want to focus on Hardcore players, but the fact their business strategy is a 20/80 mix of 1st party games, no matter how they market it, third party publishers will bring plenty of casual games day 1.. over and above how they market next gen backwards compatibility (its enhancements for PS4 games too)
Silly argument, saying it'd be dead on arrival.
Remember the same stupid sentiment when Mobile was going to rule the world.
Alright sure. I'll go with around 15 million consoles a (fiscal) year
No, that was never my point. My point was PS4 had free reign whilst now ps5 could sell less because it doesn't anymore. Which doesn't mean Xbox is gonna sell more, but that the ratio will be less extreme
For example, if Joe Schmoe the "time filler" gamer already owns a PS4 and a good number of games why would he invest in anything other than a PS5 if he can easily take his games with him? Even more so if he is now free to sell his PS4 towards a PS5.
i concur. I am in singapore. There's no way in the seven hells that you can convince us southeast asians to subscribe to an online service to stream games....
it's one thing to stream tv and movies via netflix. For gaming, fat chance man...
No, because streaming is the future, you must ignore everething else. Streaming is the new mobile games future that doomed PS4 XB1 and Switch. What they ignore is how bad streaming is and how alot of the world, especial casuals dont have internet good enough for streaming games.Can't read the full article at work but do they ignore or dismiss the importance of backwards compatibility in retaining a userbase?
For example, if Joe Schmoe the "time filler" gamer already owns a PS4 and a good number of games why would he invest in anything other than a PS5 if he can easily take his games with him? Even more so if he is now free to sell his PS4 towards a PS5.
There is some truth to this.
As I get older and my time constraints change with gaming the gamepass subscription service makes sense.
This gen I was all ps4 with probably 50 hard copy games in my library . My playstation + just expired and I didnt renew.
I'm not seeing the value in the ps brand right now besides exclusives. Microsoft has them beat in every single aspect besides that.
So will Nintendo also become blockbuster?Not wrong.
if Sony don't make a gamepass equivalence service soon, they will slowly become the blockbuster of gaming.
They can survive within their traditional niche but the world have moved on.
Yeah no there's very little truth to this.There is some truth to this.
I'm not seeing the value in the ps brand right now besides exclusives. Microsoft has them beat in every single aspect besides that.
The world isn't moving on with microsoft, game pass is fine but it's not the game changer that some pretend it to be just like google stradia has a long way to go to even compete and it's not there yet.Not wrong.
if Sony don't make a gamepass equivalence service soon, they will slowly become the blockbuster of gaming.
They can survive within their traditional niche but the world have moved on.
There were tons of articles in 2013 saying sony was dead and microsoft was going to run away with it. That never happened and will not happen. All this is the same doom and gloom that some sites wanna pretend is fact.
Nah ps3 hardware wise was a total disaster with the Kutaragi obsession of the cell cpu. And the final result wasn't even worth for such price. Multiplat showed it more than a time. There was no need of such exotic hardware. This time the console won't have such issue and surely won't cost 599 bucks. We are far away to the ps3 situation.I'm not sure it's quite the right strategy, since it seems similar to what they did with the PS3, and that backfired.
That said, barring Stadia or Xcloud suddenly destroying the console market, the PS3 also showed that even if they do have a completely wrong strategy, they can cruise to 80 Million if they want to.