I feel like only exclusives will be the only titles that use it.
My prediction almost came true. Sony has actually done better than expected.My prediction is that Sony only has 500GB of SSD hardspace (~2x times as fast as microsofts solution) to keep cost down and people will have buy proprietary upgrades which will offset Sonys lose leading approach for the PS5.
$299 you meanSlower CPU, RAM and GPU?
It better be $399
Edit: After the presentation, I may have jumped the shark. SSD seems insane, holy crap.
I'm not so sure. They are too close power wise and that SSD won't come cheap. Remember that Xbox One was a lot weaker (in comparison) and had the same price.
Both consoles are nice, correct.Same people who were crying tears of joy for 13tf PS were only Happy because IT would be more powerful than Series X.
There was lots of people who said they would be Happy for anything over 10. For me those specs are just fine and Series X looks amazing too.
I've had this in mind for a while now (and I'm far from the only one), but SSD speed influences game design and we're yet to see the way it's integrated into the experience. Regardless, it's a game changer.imagine thinking that gamers wants slightly faster loading times instead of more powerfull cpu\gpu...
if this thing is more than 400 dolars just for the ssd, sony is totally out of his mind...
XSX is brute force powerful?The Xbox Series X is hands-down the more powerful machine, but it is seemingly a more simplistic approach - lots of brute power. The PS5 is the 'weaker' of the two, but has been developed with lots of systems and tricks designed to allow devs to squeeze more out of it. Or at least, that's how it seems so far.
How'd you come to that conclusion? Did you miss the presentation? You clearly did. The PS5's frequency speeds are so insane that the teraflops talk is now embarrassing. PS5 is going to be more "powerful" in the long run.
Not in storage speeds. This sounds super custom that will yield some crazy cool fast loading on top of game streaming assets.
Is there any reason in particular? This is a huge leap over PS4. Games next gen are will (should) look and play great.
Because its about 20% weaker than the XSX with a weaker GPU, slower ram, less memory bandwidth and a slower CPU. Its reasonable for someone to be disappointed and at the same time acknowledging its a nice machine in its own right.
SSD speed influences game design and we're yet to see the way it's integrated into the experience.
It's a game changer.
"Slightly faster", well I'm expecting next to zero load times from this thing, whereas the demo that Microsoft showed a couple of days ago had a current-gen game loading in 8 seconds which I would imagine adds up.
XSX is brute force powerful?
PS5 is smartly optimised powerful?
I never doubted the Cerny, and 5.5GB/s SSD is the cherry on top.
That said, if third party games run better and more stable on the Series X...that could give them a step up. If it's minor sure. But if it ends up the difference between a stable 60 and a 60 with a bunch of dips... It may actually be a competitive gen
how many times at launch did you not go green since the xbox 360?
Let's be realistic though. They'll be the market leader because the Xbox is a non-starter in most of the world outside America and parts of Europe.Yeah, I am kinda feeling that in real terms the advantage won't be so noticeable. Still, Sony so far has the edge when it comes to exclusives, and I guess that the console will be cheaper, so I'd still bet on them to be the market leader.
They have the power and the small optimizations.MS explains how their system works and the neat APIs and small things they're doing to make the XSX optimal.
Forums: "Seems the XSX is brute-forcing it"
lol okaaay
Xbox > PS5>Xboxim not so technical, what does this mean exactly?
Pretty graphics?
I wanted to see the new controller lolI wasn't interest in specs, I just wanted to see what the console looked like. 😅
You're getting it backwaards. PS5 has a one memory pool unlike the two in XSX and its GPU will most likely be more easily saturated than XSX because of the higher throughput. It'll be slower than XSX, but not by much and clearly more efficient.
Lol. Are people even serious? These are dream specs for anything less than $1000. A few weeks ago we weren't even sure about RDNA 2 and last year thought 10TF is a wet dream. Also the important thing which is the SSD is insane.Acceptable performance for a $450 machine and not a dime more.
This wont happen unless the XSX is targeting unattainably higher settings and res or a dev messed up. XSX GPU is just better, full stop.Well, the way Cerny made it sound, CUs are important than teraflops because it results in a faster GPU. PS5 could very well end up having better performance for most games.
Are developers going to have the knowledge to use all of these tricks?
You're getting it backwaards. PS5 has a one memory pool unlike the two in XSX and its GPU will most likely be more easily saturated than XSX because of the higher throughput. It'll be slower than XSX, but not by much and clearly more efficient.