Should my Warrior pack not be appearing in "Ready To Install"?
Check your rewards.
Should my Warrior pack not be appearing in "Ready To Install"?
Server issues as expected. If it isn't up within the hour, I'll head to bed and try tomorrow.
We're in a time where server issues are all but guaranteed for big releases and after these last few years of dealing with borked online launches, I hardly have enough energy to stay up late and bother trying my luck.
Na, you should expect a rushed release in time for christmas that has all sorts of issues.Shit man game preview of the biggest game of the year. I should at least expect to play it...
Did you play past the matchmaking? It's been fine for me.This performance is really poor form. Like this will scare people away. Really bad. Even on X.
pretty much ruins midnight launches for online titles. that and day one patches lol
If people should expect something like a pre-alpha release, then Microsoft did an awful job advertising for the game like they did. From what I hear it's way worst than the EA on PC and this is not normal. When you sell a game, even on EA, you should expect to at least be able to play. If there is bug and issues it's ok but it sounds beyond that.Its a shit, but its at the same time expected. If not, Bluehole wouldnt have released this game on game preview to begin ;)
If people should expect something like a pre-alpha release, then Microsoft did an awful job advertising for the game like they did. From what I hear it's way worst than the EA on PC and this is not normal. When you sell a game, even on EA, you should expect to at least be able to play. If there is bug and issues it's ok but it sounds beyond that.
You are not going to escape the frankly awful CPU in the current consoles, large map size with high player counts is a killer on PC's with weak CPU (see Arma for example).
Being buggy is to expected with early release but the lower framerate issues in games of this type are determined by your CPU, and frankly the console CPU's are shit.
Did it scare people away on PC?This performance is really poor form. Like this will scare people away. Really bad. Even on X.
In case anyone is curious about what the game looks like on base Xbox One hardware...
My wife just finished a game a few minutes ago too.How come I saw people playing yesterday? Like literally playing?
You could always brute force it on PC the user experience is different in that regard than console.
Bombs land in red zones, avoid them (or be bold and just run!)
it should still run better than it does. battlefield keeps track of 60 players, vehicles, destruction, etc all cpu bound, with a higher tick rate and a frame rate averaging 40-60 on base hardware. on a moment to moment basis there is a lot less going on in pubg as well. the games coding simply needs a ground up overhaul to be optimized.
It wasn't in mine either, I just had a loot box waiting for me.
In case anyone is curious about what the game looks like on base Xbox One hardware...
In case anyone is curious about what the game looks like on base Xbox One hardware...
Dont want to be that guy but those screens remind me of Flashpoint lol
You could always brute force it on PC the user experience is different in that regard than console.
I'm on an X and it's so choppy precise aiming is impossible.
Movement feels off too it's like there is input latency.
Played with a buddy on his X and he has all the same general complaints.
Played this all year on PC so I'm a bit jaded in that regard.
But with the choppiness it feels like a crapshoot in close quarters combat.
I'm on an X and it's so choppy precise aiming is impossible.
Movement feels off too it's like there is input latency.
Played with a buddy on his X and he has all the same general complaints.
Played this all year on PC so I'm a bit jaded in that regard.
But with the choppiness it feels like a crapshoot in close quarters combat.
Eh, the game run likes shit on PC for most people even on high-end systems. I mean, pro players were reporting that it ran at 20-40fps on the PCs at the latest official tournament. Yet 20million people still play it because it's so much fun.
Also on an X and have the same feelings. I get the impression some folk who didn't play on PC aren't aware of how it should feel possibly combined with just a higher tolerance for low frame rates. But for me the game seems like it's barely hitting 30 with constant input lag kicking in that gets particularly worse when you aim down sights - the one period you really don't want input lag. I'm really interested to see what's going on via DF, but it's close to unplayable for me personally.I'm on an X and it's so choppy precise aiming is impossible.
Movement feels off too it's like there is input latency.
Played with a buddy on his X and he has all the same general complaints.
Played this all year on PC so I'm a bit jaded in that regard.
But with the choppiness it feels like a crapshoot in close quarters combat.
I dont see it being 60 fps ever on the console, lets be honest .... a 6-7 year low power AMD CPU that was trash when it was new. Also I dont think Battlefield operates in the same manner as PUBG or Arma for example and is not a like for like comparison.
I agree it could get better, but it will never be great. I couldn't play this game at less than 60fps.
Made it to top 2. Choked when my gun was on single shot, not full auto...
Note to self: Make sure gun on full auto before engaging.
In case anyone is curious about what the game looks like on base Xbox One hardware...
Right but surely we should have a standard, right? I mean I am loving the core game here but the visuals and performance are damn near unacceptable. We can't dismiss poor technical performance solely because of solid gameplay.
People either don't show up at a certain distance or they're sort of just vaguely defined silhouettes.With that 2nd shot, I thought you were playing Skyrim VR. So does that mean people are easier to see without the foliage, or do they just not show up at all?