then you are fortunateI haven't seen a single person complaining about GoW coming to PC tho
then you are fortunateI haven't seen a single person complaining about GoW coming to PC tho
There's people on this site doing that - in the PS OT thread where its apparently devaluing the brand or some other stupid reasoning. Basically stupid fanboy reasoning like I'd see from 10 year olds back in the day when we'd complain about Snes and MD in the playground, except I assume these people are older (though going by their posts you couldnt tell)I haven't seen a single person complaining about GoW coming to PC tho
There was even some in the Steam forum for the game of all places.It's in the usual places. Just look at the comments on the GoW PC PlayStation blog post, Facebook post, YouTube or Twitter.
Not that I'm against PC ports, but what Console maker has/had put their games on PC and it increased the brands perception in terms of Quality, Reach, Effciency and being a power player?This has to be an incredibly small minority of people. This does nothing but help further the Playstation brand which is good for Playstation fans. You'd have to be an incredible weirdo to be against the PC ports.
Check TwitterI haven't seen a single person complaining about GoW coming to PC tho
Well Microsofts games have been consistently in the steam top selling charts all the time basically.Not that I'm against PC ports, but what Console maker has/had put they're games on PC and it increased the brands perception in terms of Quality, Reach, Effciency and being a power player?
I haven't seen a single person complaining about GoW coming to PC tho
So you think having PS and Xbox FP games on PC is a negative? That getting it out in front of more people doesn't increase the brands visibility? Interesting.Not that I'm against PC ports, but what Console maker has/had put their games on PC and it increased the brands perception in terms of Quality, Reach, Effciency and being a power player?
Microsoft. Look at FH3/4/5Not that I'm against PC ports, but what Console maker has/had put their games on PC and it increased the brands perception in terms of Quality, Reach, Effciency and being a power player?
Completely ignored my question. I didnt say anything about that. Name me the console maker or brand.So you think having PS and Xbox FP games on PC is a negative? That getting it out in front of more people doesn't increase the brands visibility? Interesting.
Was the same for HZD.There was even some in the Steam forum for the game of all places.
False advertising? Where?
I'm not sure how people are supposed to take this as a question asked in good faith, when there are only three console makers, and Microsoft is obviously the only one that is putting their games on PC with a sustained initiative.Not that I'm against PC ports, but what Console maker has/had put their games on PC and it increased the brands perception in terms of Quality, Reach, Efficiency and being a power player?
MS isnt on the same level as Sony in the Console space, and not in the same space as Sony and Nintendo in the game making Space. We'll see about the future after they bought a major publisher.Well Microsofts games have been consistently in the steam top selling charts all the time basically.
I'm not sure how people are supposed to take this as a question asked in good faith, when there are only three console makers, and Microsoft is obviously the only one that is putting their games on PC with a sustained initiative.
🙄Not that I'm against PC ports, but what Console maker has/had put their games on PC and it increased the brands perception in terms of Quality, Reach, Effciency and being a power player?
I meant ever, in the history of consoles. Thats not to say i dont think gaming should expand though. But has MS's initiative to put games on PC increased their standing?False advertising? Where?
Someone should tell juiceXgamer6 that Rachet & Clank was on the Nvidia leak lost, along with Horizon Forbidden West, Demon's Souls, and Returnal.
I'm sure that'll brighten his day.
I'm not sure how people are supposed to take this as a question asked in good faith, when there are only three console makers, and Microsoft is obviously the only one that is putting their games on PC with a sustained initiative.
You are reaching for an answer you already have in your mind, so just make the statement you want to make.
So you asked a question that couldn't be answered because there is only one such scenario and it doesn't count apparently? Why even make the question then?MS isnt on the same level as Sony in the Console space, and not in the same space as Sony and Nintendo in the game making Space. We'll see about the future after they bought a major publisher.
Microsoft for sure, since they started putting their games on Steam. But I guess you're now going to move the....Not that I'm against PC ports, but what Console maker has/had put their games on PC and it increased the brands perception in terms of Quality, Reach, Effciency and being a power player?
... goalposts!MS isnt on the same level as Sony in the Console space, and not in the same space as Sony and Nintendo in the game making Space. We'll see about the future after they bought a major publisher.
Didn't you know?Microsoft for sure, since they started putting their games on Steam. But I guess you're now going to move the....
... goalposts!
Isnt MS the weakest of the 3 currently in terms of Games? The later half of the 360 gen and most of the last gen they werent worth much in terms of games (relatively). I mean yeah they put their games on steam but are they getting 20 million sellers every year like Sony and Nintendo?Microsoft for sure, since they started putting their games on Steam. But I guess you're now going to move the....
... goalposts!
No need to check Twitter, check the reveal thread here which is now locked. It got locked for the many reasons Steph brings up.
Calling games exclusive when they are not? Happens all the time with Sony
Isnt MS the weakest of the 3 currently in terms of Games? The later half of the 360 gen and most of the last gen they werent worth much in terms of games (relatively). I mean yeah they put their games on steam but are they getting 20 million sellers every year like Sony and Nintendo?
lol... said user thinks he is so sleek, has also been banned multiple times for trolling.
The answer to your question is: Who cares? Why should we as consumers care at all about the 'brand benefit', over simply the expanded access to more gamers?I meant ever, in the history of consoles. Thats not to say i dont think gaming should expand though. But has MS's initiative to put games on PC increased their standing?
Anyone who actually feels bad if a game isn't exclusive to the platform is exactly who Stephanie's video was about, it's absolute immaturity and silliness.Calling games exclusive when they are not? Happens all the time with Sony
Yes but it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact their games are on Steam and you know it.Isnt MS the weakest of the 3 currently in terms of Games? The later half of the 360 gen and most of the last gen they werent worth much in terms of games (relatively). I mean yeah they put their games on steam but are they getting 20 million sellers every year like Sony and Nintendo?
If you check, you can find pretty much everything on the internet, but a few dozen people don't represent the vast majority
This is just giving useless attention to a few fanboys
I personally won't refuse another option to play a game on, but I'll definitely call Sony out on its bullshit, PC and PS gamers deserve to know when and if games are going to another platform, that's allAnyone who actually feels bad if a game isn't exclusive to the platform is exactly who Stephanie's video was about, it's absolute immaturity and silliness.
An adult shouldn't hold onto a brand like that.
You talked about reach, sales are irrelevant for that when people can play your game without having to buy it. But for instance, Was Sea of Thieves played by more people than God of War? Yes it was, that's gotta count for something at least in terms of 'reach'. Also please note that im not saying one game or one brand is better than the other, im just answering your question.Isnt MS the weakest of the 3 currently in terms of Games? The later half of the 360 gen and most of the last gen they werent worth much in terms of games (relatively). I mean yeah they put their games on steam but are they getting 20 million sellers every year like Sony and Nintendo?
I'd say MS is now more relevant in gaming than ever, and Sony is scrambling to catch up to them.MS isnt on the same level as Sony in the Console space, and not in the same space as Sony and Nintendo in the game making Space. We'll see about the future after they bought a major publisher.
lol... said user thinks he is so sleek, has also been banned multiple times for trolling.
Calling games exclusive when they are not? Happens all the time with Sony
Uncharted 4 2016 is appraching 20 i thinkSony is not getting a 20 million seller every year lmao
What the fuck are you smoking?
After a small dive in your post history it's crystal clear what a type of poster you are.
Have fun not gonna bother anymore.
Read the comment I initially responded to.The answer to your question is: Who cares? Why should we as consumers care at all about the 'brand benefit', over simply the expanded access to more gamers?
The only true statement on the matter, is that releasing games on PC can in no way hurt a console makers standing in the market.
Anyone who actually feels bad if a game isn't exclusive to the platform is exactly who Stephanie's video was about, it's absolute immaturity and silliness.
An adult shouldn't hold onto a brand like that.