MS has what, over 20 1st party studios now ? And people are expecting just the zenimax ones to come to PS. I mean , think about that haha .
That's not true.Xbox fans seem to think that permanent exclusivity is totally a fair exchange for a couple games being timed exclusive and I don't get it. Like Xbox owners would get those games eventually, they'd just have to wait.
PS owners get jack shit now. How do you not see how this is a worse situation?
I'm sure they would love to port all first party content to Playstation if Sony allowed Gamepass on their devices.Most people aren't going to acknowledge the fact that a few months ago this goof said exclusives are counter to what gaming is about so you're wasting you're time posting this.
That's not true.
We don't know if it's truly exclusive or even timed exclusive yet. We do know that Deathloop + Ghostwire Tokyo are still timed exclusive.
Most people aren't going to acknowledge the fact that a few months ago this goof said exclusives are counter to what gaming is about so you're wasting you're time posting this.
Lol I don't know why anyone would expect to play these games on PlayStation anymore.
This.Lol I don't know why anyone would expect to play these games on PlayStation anymore.
You see .. that would be correct if I didn't own a good gaming PC as well as a Playstation 4 and soon 5. I don't even like the types of games these studios typically put out.You'll most likely to play first-party on a PC, Android or iOS device via xCloud once that's fully launched. But I understand that because it's not on a PS5, you feel like you're the victim here.
If GamePass was on PS it would have to be only XGS games . Dont see that ever happeningI'm sure they would love to port all first party content to Playstation if Sony allowed Gamepass on their devices.
Doubt they will say it. It would just not convince people on the fence from buying an X console.Come on, we all know better than that. if they had any plans to support Playstation owners in any way they would come out and say it.
Of course they are. They want to avoid the backlash and get people used to the idea.
They do put a ton of emphasis on platform exclusivity though. There isn't a single large AAA title published by Microsoft that has been released on Switch or Playstation.Because Microsoft is a corporation that wants to make money? It's extraordinary simple, and I don't mean to sound reductionist — but money is what makes these companies keep the lights on, not bragging rights.
If you can see your product to a larger audience, you make more money. Now whether that means timed exclusives (say for the sake of argument, 1 year) or day 1 cross platform releases it really doesn't matter. Point is, Microsoft has demonstrated time and again their market strategy is different than Sony or Nintendo and they don't put a lot of value on platform exclusivity, and just because they now own a ton of great IP, it doesn't mean their strategy will change.
Honestly I would take the timed exclusive bs if it meant I got to play a game eventually 🤷🏼♂️Xbox fans seem to think that permanent exclusivity is totally a fair exchange for a couple games being timed exclusive and I don't get it. Like Xbox owners would get those games eventually, they'd just have to wait.
PS owners get jack shit now. How do you not see how this is a worse situation?
People need to make choices come next gen. Isn't that how it always goes? Can't have it all unfortunately, I wish we could. I'd like to play 2019 God of War, and you know people tell me to buy a Playstation then. Well I don't wanna cause I play on PC, so you don't hear me complaining (fingers crossed for a PC port though). I'd be overjoyed if games were platform agnostic (as long as the hardware can run it). But people keep telling me that we NEED exclusives, because nobody would buy consoles otherwise or some stupid shit.Xbox fans seem to think that permanent exclusivity is totally a fair exchange for a couple games being timed exclusive and I don't get it. Like Xbox owners would get those games eventually, they'd just have to wait.
PS owners get jack shit now. How do you not see how this is a worse situation?
That's the long game Microsoft is playing though.If GamePass was on PS it would have to be only XGS games . Dont see that ever happening
Uhh yea! 😆 and next year Sony will be publishing MLB on Xbox and Sony uses MS servers..
There's nothing even vague about this lmao. You want to play these games, get an xbox, PC or stream it through game pass."But as the Xbox community, what they should feel this is a huge investment in the experiences they are gonna have in the xbox ecosystem. And we want the xbox ecosystem absolutely the best place to play and we think game availability is absolutely part of that."
yeah. honestly, i don't understand why people expect the new studios to operate any differently than the ones they had.MS has what, over 20 1st party studios now ? And people are expecting just the zenimax ones to come to PS. I mean , think about that haha .
Again, they have yet to bring a single game from a first party studio to a non ms platform, that hasn't been specifically Announced for another platform pre acquisition. I think people are somehow missing that.Because Microsoft is a corporation that wants to make money? It's extraordinary simple, and I don't mean to sound reductionist — but money is what makes these companies keep the lights on, not bragging rights.
If you can see your product to a larger audience, you make more money. Now whether that means timed exclusives (say for the sake of argument, 1 year) or day 1 cross platform releases it really doesn't matter. Point is, Microsoft has demonstrated time and again their market strategy is different than Sony or Nintendo and they don't put a lot of value on platform exclusivity, and just because they now own a ton of great IP, it doesn't mean their strategy will change.
Then what about the timed exclusivity for Deathloop + Ghostwire Tokyo for Xbox Owners?So how can anyone play Zenimax games now without
You see .. that would be correct if I didn't own a good gaming PC as well as a Playstation 4 and soon 5. I don't even like the types of games these studios typically put out.
This affects me zero. What drives me nuts is all the double standards and lies people keep pushing out and that Phil is just as bad.
So how can anyone play Zenimax games now without
You see .. that would be correct if I didn't own a good gaming PC as well as a Playstation 4 and soon 5. I don't even like the types of games these studios typically put out.
This affects me zero. What drives me nuts is all the double standards and lies people keep pushing out and that Phil is just as bad.
I could see PS5 ports of the big titles a few years later. Full price, $70 entries one to two years after release would surely be lucrative, no? And having that exclusivity for over a year would still get people to enter into the ecosystem early.
...or they just stay exclusive, who knows.
That isn't what that term means ...
I could see PS5 ports of the big titles a few years later. Full price, $70 entries one to two years after release would surely be lucrative, no? And having that exclusivity for over a year would still get people to enter into the ecosystem early.
...or they just stay exclusive, who knows.
For anyone having trouble reading between the lines, just answer one question for me:
Why would the company
that has been criticized throughout the entire last generation
for their lack of exclusives
spend 7.5 billion dollars
(nearly twice as much as what Disney paid for Star Wars)
to own some of the most beloved IPs in gaming, along with their incredibly talented developers
and then continue to release games in those IPs on competing platforms
when they want you to buy an Xbox Series S, an Xbox Series X, or a PC
when the platform they competed with most directly last generation
demolished them in units sold
practically solely on the basis that they had incredibly compelling exclusive games that were not available anywhere else
?
Go on, I'll wait.
Could definitely see that happening. Will be very interesting to see how this ends up playing out. I think exclusivity throughout is still the odds-on favorite for sure, but these other approaches are possible as well.Maybe they release Starfield 1 a year or 2 before Starfield 2 is ready kinda like what Sony did regarding Horizon. Same with TES and Fallout
Oh, without a doubt. It would need to practically be a shadow drop.Even if that happens, which may be doubtful, I don't think you'll ever get anything like a "also available on other platforms in 1 year" type of heads up.
It'll be entirely up to MS how they want to do that. 14 months? 16 months? 24 months? 30 months? They will probably withhold games for as long as they provide a large benefit to the XBox brand, they're under no obligation to adhere to some kind of "well you know 1 year is the standard exclusivity window, you should probably stick to that to be nice" type of thing.
So that will be another thing, Playstation users will likely always feel like they're in the dark with stuff like that.
Ports make no sense, the little bit of revenue MS would make from PS sales does not compare to the money they would make from getting that customer into the ecosystem. Console + yearly gamepass + third party license fees > 45% publisher cut per share from Sony version.I could see PS5 ports of the big titles a few years later. Full price, $70 entries one to two years after release would surely be lucrative, no? And having that exclusivity for over a year would get people to enter into the ecosystem early.
...or they just stay exclusive, who knows.
Ports make no sense, the little bit of revenue MS would make from PS sales does not compare to the money they would make from getting that customer into the ecosystem. Console + yearly gamepass + third party license fees > 45% publisher cut per share from Sony version.
Xbox fans seem to think that permanent exclusivity is totally a fair exchange for a couple games being timed exclusive and I don't get it. Like Xbox owners would get those games eventually, they'd just have to wait.
PS owners get jack shit now. How do you not see how this is a worse situation?
Yeah, it comes down to the raw dollars and cents here. Like I said above, while I think this port approach is a possibility, these games just staying exclusive to Xbox/PC is still very much the likely scenario.Ports make no sense, the little bit of revenue MS would make from PS sales does not compare to the money they would make from getting that customer into the ecosystem. Console + yearly gamepass + third party license fees > 45% publisher cut per share from Sony version.
This "Microsoft doesn't even THINK about Playstation" mindset is hilarious. Microsoft absolutely gives a shit about depriving games from Sony players, otherwise they would just tell PS fans not to worry the way they did when they bought Minecraft.
The fact they're being cagey at all proves they have no plans to support Playstation owners in any way.
But right no there are 0 ps5sI think Phil is keeping it open and seeing what happens, if you need to make a return on a 7.5 billion investment it would be hard to ignore 80 million PS5's.
I think Phil is keeping it open and seeing what happens, if you need to make a return on a 7.5 billion investment it would be hard to ignore 80 million PS5's.
I think Phil is keeping it open and seeing what happens, if you need to make a return on a 7.5 billion investment it would be hard to ignore 80 million PS5's.